Abstract
The two opposites “specialization” and “integrated approaches” are taken as an example to explain the subtleties of a dialectic situation. In order to overcome the either-or relation in a possible synthesis, it is necessary that both sides make themselves aware of advantages as well as disadvantages of their own approach. A model is suggested to help in the dialectic process aiming at the synthesis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
See for example: Pietschmann H., Phänomenologie der Naturwissenschaft. Springer Berlin 1996
One possible method is described in: Pietschmann H., Die Sicherheit der Naturgesetze, in: Eranos Jahrbuch 1986, (Ritsema R., Editor) Insel, Frankfurt 1988, p. 89
Dschuang-dsi. Das wahre Buch vom südlichen Blütenland. Diederich, Düsseldorf 1977
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pietschmann, H. (1997). Limits of Specialization and Integrated Approaches. In: Mizrahi, A., Fulder, S., Sheinman, N. (eds) Potentiating Health and the Crisis of the Immune System. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0059-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0059-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0061-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0059-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive