Individual Differences in Substance Abuse

An Introduction
  • Stephen A. Maisto
  • Mark Galizio
  • Kate B. Carey
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)


Virtually every adolescent and adult in the United States today is exposed each day to the opportunity to use alcohol and tobacco. A smaller, but still significant, percentage of the population is exposed to the opportunity to use a range of illicit drugs from marijuana to heroin. Most of the members of our society have or will have some experience with a variety of psychoactive drugs. Some—but by no means all or most—will become casualties: they will become dependent on one or more drugs. A fundamental question that must be addressed in any serious theory of substance abuse is the problem of individual differences. One way of trying to understand why some individuals become dependent on or abuse drugs, whereas others do not, is to describe characteristics that are discriminative. Some of these factors have been highlighted in recent national surveys.


Substance Abuse Alcohol Abuse Substance Dependence Recent National Survey Stance Abuse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ( 3rd ed. ). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, R. E., Boland, J. P., Smart, C. N., and Kanak, J. R. The economic cost of alcohol abuse–1975. Final report, Contract No. ADM 281–76–0016. Prepared for the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, W., and Midanik, L. Alcohol use and alcohol problems among U. S. adults. In Alcohol consumption and related problems. Alcohol and Health Monograph 1. Rockville, Md.: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 1982.Google Scholar
  4. Fishburne, P. M., Abelson, H. I., and Cisin, I. H. The national survey on drug abuse: 1979. Washington, D.C.: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1979.Google Scholar
  5. Galizio, M. In defense of reductionism. Bulletin of the Society of Psychologists in Substance Abuse, 1982, 1, 98–99.Google Scholar
  6. Lettieri, D. J., Sayers, M., and Pearson, H. W. (Eds.), Theories on drug abuse. Rockville, Md.: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. Maisto, S.A., and Caddy, G. R. Self-control and addictive behavior: Present status and prospects. International Journal of the Addictions, 1981, 16, 109–133.Google Scholar
  8. Roebuck, J., and Kessler, R. The etiology of alcoholism. Springfield, Il.: Charles C. Thomas, 1972.Google Scholar
  9. The Alcoholism Report,1982, X,3–4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen A. Maisto
    • 1
  • Mark Galizio
    • 2
  • Kate B. Carey
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North Carolina at WilmingtonWilmingtonUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations