Density Functional Theory pp 33-49 | Cite as

# Energy Functionals: Gradient Expansions and Beyond

## Abstract

The determination of the ground state energy and the ground state electron density distribution of a many-electron system in a fixed external potential is a problem of major importance in condensed matter physics. For a given Hamiltonian and for specified boundary conditions, it is possible in principle to obtain directly numerical solutions of the the Schrodinger equation. Even with current generations of computers, this is feasible in practice only for systems of rather small total electron number. Of course, a variety of alternative methods, such as self-consistent mean field theories, also exist. However, these are approximate.

## Keywords

Density Functional Theory Ground State Energy Thermodynamic Limit Local Density Approximation Finite Temperature## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- [1]P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. B.
**136**, 864 (1964).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [2]W. Kohn and L.J. Sham, Phys. Rev.
**140**, A1133 (1965).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [3]N.D. Mermin, Phys. Rev.
**137**, A1441 (1965).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [4]W. Kohn and P. Vashishta, in
*Theory of the Inhomogeneous Electron Gas*, edited by S. Lundqvist and N.H. March (Plenum, New York, 1983), p. 79.Google Scholar - [5]D. Pines and P. Nozieres,
*The Theory of Quantum Liquids*, (Benjamin, New York, 1966).Google Scholar - [7]D.J.W. Geldart and M. Rasolt, in
*The Single Particle Density in Physics and Chem istry*, edited by N.H. March and B.M. Deb (Academic, London, 1987), p. 151.Google Scholar - [8]D.J.W. Geldart and M. Rasolt, in
*Strongly Correlated Electron Systems*, edited by M.P. Das and D. Neilson (Nova Science Publishers, New York, 1992).Google Scholar - [9]K.G. Wilson and J. Kogut, Phys. Reports.
**12**, 75 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [10]S-K. Ma and K.A. Brueckner, Phys. Rev.
**165**, 18 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [11]L.J. Sham, in
*Computational Methods in Band Theory*, edited by P.J. Marcus, J.F. Janak, and A.R. Williams (Plenum, New York, 1971), p. 458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [12]D.J.W. Geldart and M. Rasolt, Report submitted to the National Research Council of Canada (1972).Google Scholar
- [13]L. Kleinman, Phys. Rev. B.
**10**, 2221 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [14]D.J.W. Geldart. M. Rasolt, and CO. Ambladh, Sol. State Commun.
**16**, 243 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [15]M. Rasolt and D.J.W. Geldart, Phys. Rev. Lett.
**35**, 1234 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [16]D.J.W. Geldart and M. Rasolt, Phys. Rev. B.
**13**, 1477 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [17]It may be convenient to consider the entire system to be confined within a very large container having inpenetrable walls if realistic equilibrium of vapour and condensed phases is important. In cases of immediate interest, the true vapour phase is not an essential feature and the relatively small volume occupied by the condensed phase is the more important thermodynamical variable. There are still subtleties associated with taking the thermodynamic limit, particularly when isolating surface and bulk effects, but the problems with vanishing density of particles can be controlled.Google Scholar
- [18]D.J.W. Geldart and R. Taylor, Can. J. Phys.
**48**, 155 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [19]A.D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A.
**38**, 3098 (1988). References to other work aimed at providing generalizations of simple gradient expansions are also given in this work.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [20]D.J.W. Geldart, E. Dunlap, M.L. Glasser, and M.R.A. Shegelski, Sol. State Commun.
**88**, 81 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [21]E. Dunlap and D.J.W. Geldart, Can. J. Phys.
**72**, 1 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [22]M.L. Glasser, D.J.W. Geldart, and E. Dunlap, Can. J. Phys.
**72**, 7 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [23]M.R.A. Shegelski, D.J.W. Geldart, M.L. Glasser and D. Neilson, Can. J. Phys.
**72**, 14 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [24]J.A. Chevary and S.H. Vosko, Phys. Rev. B.
**42**, 5320 (1990). This paper also contains references to earlier numerical work.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [25]E. Engel and S.H. Vosko, Phys. Rev. B.
**42**, 4940 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [26]F. Herman, J.P. Van Dyke, and I.B. Ortenburger, Phys. Rev. Lett.
**22**, 807 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [27]A.M. Boring, Phys. Rev. B.
**2**, 1506 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [28]A.D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys.
**84**, 4524 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar