Abstract
A yield model, based on test site data and layout analysis of yield-sensitive critical geometries, has been developed for a two-level metal, twin-tub 1.25μm CMOS silicon IC process. This yield model can be extended to other CMOS technologies. For each yield-loss mechanism, electrical test results from the test sites and the critical geometries extracted from a particular IC chip layout database are used in the model to predict the components of the IC chip yield and the total chip functional yield with a statistical confidence interval based on the Poisson distribution. An experimental implementation in which test sites and memory chips are fabricated in equal numbers on the same wafer makes it feasible to model the memory chip yield on a wafer-by-wafer basis. The wafer-by-wafer analysis is of interest in cases where there is considerable variation within a wafer lot. Examples are given of lots in which individual wafers are well modeled over a wide range of memory chip yield. In addition, an example is given of a lot in which some wafers are not well modeled in comparison with actual functional yields, indicating that some mechanisms are operative which have not been monitored.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
W.J. Bertram, “Yield and Reliability”, in VLSI Technology, ed. S.M. Sze, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983.
A.V. Ferris-Prabhu, “Defects, Faults, and Semiconductor Device Yield”, International Workshop on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, Oct. 6–7, 1988, IEEE Computer Society, p. 1.1-1 to 1.1-12.
C.H. Stapper, Jr., “Modeling of Defects in Integrated Circuit Photolithographic Patterns,” IBM J. Res. Dev., vol.28(4), pp.461–475, July 1984.
R. Glang, “Measurement and Distribution of Faults on Defect Test Site Chips”, International Workshop on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, Oct. 6–7, 1988, IEEE Computer Society, p.3.1-1 to 3.1-12.
M.A. Mitchell, “Defect Test Structures for Characterization of VLSI Technology”, Solid State Technology, Vol.28, no.5, pp.207–213, (May 1985).
W. Lukaszek, W. Yarbrough, T. Walker, J. Meindl, “CMOS Test Chip Design for Process Problem Debugging and Yield Prediction Experiments”, Sol. St. Tech., Vol.29, No.3, pp.87–93, March 1986.
C. Alcorn, D. Dworak, N. Haddad, W. Henley, and P. Nixon, “Kerf Test Structure Designs for Process and Device Characterization”, Sol. St. Technology, Vol.28, no.5, p.229, (May 1985).
C.H. Stapper, Jr. “On A Composite Model to the IC Yield Problem”, IEEE J. Sol. St. Circuits, vol. SC-10, pp.537–539, Dec. 1975.
S. Magdo, “Yield Model for Projection from Test Site”, International Workshop on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, Oct. 6–7, 1988, IEEE Computer Society, p.3.4-1 to 3.4-9.
U. Kaempf, “Statistical Significance of Defect Density Estimates”, 1988 IEEE Proc. Microelect. Test Structures, Vol. 1, p.107, 1988.
It may be shown for random variables X, Y, and Z for which Z = XY that The fourth-order term in the brackets on the right is usually negligible. See Bevington, P.R., “Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Drum, C.M., Gerlach, D.L. (1990). Yield Model with Critical Geometry Analysis for Yield Projection from Test Sites on a Wafer Basis with Confidence Limits. In: Stapper, C.H., Jain, V.K., Saucier, G. (eds) Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9957-6_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9957-6_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9959-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9957-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive