Skip to main content

Yield Model with Critical Geometry Analysis for Yield Projection from Test Sites on a Wafer Basis with Confidence Limits

  • Chapter
Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems

Abstract

A yield model, based on test site data and layout analysis of yield-sensitive critical geometries, has been developed for a two-level metal, twin-tub 1.25μm CMOS silicon IC process. This yield model can be extended to other CMOS technologies. For each yield-loss mechanism, electrical test results from the test sites and the critical geometries extracted from a particular IC chip layout database are used in the model to predict the components of the IC chip yield and the total chip functional yield with a statistical confidence interval based on the Poisson distribution. An experimental implementation in which test sites and memory chips are fabricated in equal numbers on the same wafer makes it feasible to model the memory chip yield on a wafer-by-wafer basis. The wafer-by-wafer analysis is of interest in cases where there is considerable variation within a wafer lot. Examples are given of lots in which individual wafers are well modeled over a wide range of memory chip yield. In addition, an example is given of a lot in which some wafers are not well modeled in comparison with actual functional yields, indicating that some mechanisms are operative which have not been monitored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W.J. Bertram, “Yield and Reliability”, in VLSI Technology, ed. S.M. Sze, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.V. Ferris-Prabhu, “Defects, Faults, and Semiconductor Device Yield”, International Workshop on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, Oct. 6–7, 1988, IEEE Computer Society, p. 1.1-1 to 1.1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.H. Stapper, Jr., “Modeling of Defects in Integrated Circuit Photolithographic Patterns,” IBM J. Res. Dev., vol.28(4), pp.461–475, July 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Glang, “Measurement and Distribution of Faults on Defect Test Site Chips”, International Workshop on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, Oct. 6–7, 1988, IEEE Computer Society, p.3.1-1 to 3.1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.A. Mitchell, “Defect Test Structures for Characterization of VLSI Technology”, Solid State Technology, Vol.28, no.5, pp.207–213, (May 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Lukaszek, W. Yarbrough, T. Walker, J. Meindl, “CMOS Test Chip Design for Process Problem Debugging and Yield Prediction Experiments”, Sol. St. Tech., Vol.29, No.3, pp.87–93, March 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Alcorn, D. Dworak, N. Haddad, W. Henley, and P. Nixon, “Kerf Test Structure Designs for Process and Device Characterization”, Sol. St. Technology, Vol.28, no.5, p.229, (May 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.H. Stapper, Jr. “On A Composite Model to the IC Yield Problem”, IEEE J. Sol. St. Circuits, vol. SC-10, pp.537–539, Dec. 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Magdo, “Yield Model for Projection from Test Site”, International Workshop on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, Oct. 6–7, 1988, IEEE Computer Society, p.3.4-1 to 3.4-9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. U. Kaempf, “Statistical Significance of Defect Density Estimates”, 1988 IEEE Proc. Microelect. Test Structures, Vol. 1, p.107, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. It may be shown for random variables X, Y, and Z for which Z = XY that The fourth-order term in the brackets on the right is usually negligible. See Bevington, P.R., “Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Drum, C.M., Gerlach, D.L. (1990). Yield Model with Critical Geometry Analysis for Yield Projection from Test Sites on a Wafer Basis with Confidence Limits. In: Stapper, C.H., Jain, V.K., Saucier, G. (eds) Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9957-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9957-6_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9959-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9957-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics