From Is to Ought and the Kitchen Sink: On the Justice of Distributions in Close Relationships

  • Barbara Reichle
Part of the Critical Issues in Social Justice book series (CISJ)

Abstract

As many theories in psychology, social exchange theory and equity theory (Adams, 1965; Blau, 1964; Homans, 1961; Thibaut, & Kelley, 1959) have started out with the aim to cover a rather broad area of human behavior. “Inequity in social exchange” (Adams, 1965) and “Exchange and power in social life” (Blau, 1964) are but a few examples for the rather all-encompassing nature of the original theories. In retrospect, the development of these theories seems to follow the same lines as described by Furnham (1990) for single trait personality theories. Today, three decades later, there is a wide variety of differentiations of the original theories, as is represented by the proposition of a multi-principle approach by several scholars which dates back to the late 70s (e.g. Deutsch, 1975, 1985; Lerner, 1981; Leventhal, 1980; Sampson, 1975). The original concepts have since gone through an advanced stage of “the development and refinement of more than one, often sphere-specific and multi-dimensional measures of the same concept” (which is stage six of the eight stages described by Furnham, 1990, p. 923). This is represented by studies like those conducted by Schwinger (1980), Schmitt and Montada (1982), Reis (1984), and Törnblom, Jonsson and Foa (1985). The results indicate that humans are able to use various principles in social justice judgments, and that judgments vary with personal factors like culture, values, class, gender, cognitive development, and even personality, as well as with situational factors like contexts, relationships, and objects to be distributed (overviews are given by Törnblom, 1992; Schmitt, 1994). The selection of the topic in this paper, the justice of role distributions among women and men who are spouses and parents, is yet another manifestation of the trend described.

Keywords

Child Care Procedural Justice Distributive Justice Relationship Satisfaction Marital Satisfaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aldous, J. (1978). Family careers. Developmental change in families. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality. Vol. 1: Psychological aspects. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Averill, J. R. (1978). Anger. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 1–81 ). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  5. Averill, J. R. (1980). A constructivist view of emotion. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Theories of emotion (pp. 305–339 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Badinter, E. (1991). Ich bin Du. Die neue Beziehung zwischen Mann und Frau oder Die androgyne Revolution. München: Piper.Google Scholar
  7. Barrett-Howard, E. & Tyler, T. R. (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 296–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beere, C. A. (1990). Gender roles: A handbook of tests and measures. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Brickman, P., Folger, R., Goode, E. & Schul, Y. (1981). Micro and macro justice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 173–202 ). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  11. Bundesministerium für Familie und Senioren & Statistisches Bundesamt (1994). Wo bleibt die Zeit? Die Zeitverwendung der Bevölkerung in Deutschland Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar
  12. Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (Ed.) (1994). Arbeitsmarktreport für Frauen. Berufliche Bildung und Beschäftigung von Frauen. Situation und Tendenzen. Nürnberg: Bundesanstalt für Arbeit.Google Scholar
  13. Buunk, B. P. & VanYperen, N. W. (1991). Referential comparisons, relational comparisons, and exchange orientation: Their relation to marital satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 709–717.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, R.L. (1985). Procedural justice and participation. Human Relations, 38, 643–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cowan, C. P., Cowan, P. A., Heming, G., Garrett, E., Coysh, W. S., Curtis-Boles, H. & Boles, A. J., III. (1985). Transitions to parenthood: His, hers, and theirs. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 451–481.Google Scholar
  16. Croghan, R. (1991). First-time mothers’ accounts of inequality in the division of labour. Feminism and Psychology, 1, 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crosby, F. J., Pufall, A., Snyder, R. C., O’Connell, M. & Whalen, P. (1989). The denial of personal disadvantage among you, me, and all the other ostriches. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives (pp. 79–99 ). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crowne, D. P. & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349354.Google Scholar
  19. Desmarais, S. & Lerner, M. J. (1994). Entitlements in close relationships: A justice-motive analysis. In M. J. Lerner & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond. Justice in close relationships (pp. 43–63 ). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  20. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Engelbrech, G. (1991). Berufsausbildung, Berufseinstieg und Berufsverlauf von Frauen. Empirische Befunde zur Erklärung beruflicher Segregation. Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung, 24, 531-558.Google Scholar
  23. Erler, G., Jaeckel, M., Pettinger, R. & Sass, J. (1988). Brigitte Untersuchung 88. Kind? Beruf? Oder beides? Eine repräsentative Studie über die Lebenssituation und Lebensplanung junger Paare zwischen 18 und 33 Jahren in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Auftrag der Zeitschrift Brigitte. Hamburg & München: Redaktion Brigitte und Deutsches Jugendinstitut e. V.Google Scholar
  24. Fincham, F. D. & Bradbury, T. N. (1987). Cognitive processes and conflict in close relationships: An attribution-efficacy model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1106-1118.Google Scholar
  25. Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Frijda, N. H. (1987). Emotion, cognitive structure, and action tendency. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 115-143.Google Scholar
  26. Furnham, A. (1990). The development of single trait personality theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 923–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gliedner-Simon, A. & Jansen, M. (1995). Neue Wege der Vereinbarkeit von Beruf und Familie für Frauen und Männer. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus (in press).Google Scholar
  28. Hatfield, E. & Traupmann, J. (1981). Intimate relationships: A perspective from equity theory. In S. W. Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Personal relationships. Vol 1: Studying personal relationships (pp. 165–178 ). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Harsanyi, J. C. (1991). Equality, responsibility, and justice as seen from a utilitarian perspective. Theory and Decision, 31, 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoffman, M. L. (1982). Development of prosocial motivation: Empathy and guilt. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior (pp. 281–313 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  32. Institut für Praxisorientierte Sozialforschung Mannheim. (1992). Gleichberechtigung von Frauen und Männern — Wirklichkeit und Einstellungen in der Bevölkerung. (Schriftenreihe des Bundesministers für Frauen und Jugend, Bd. 7 ). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  33. Kirchler, E. (1989). Interaktionsprozesse in Liebesbeziehungen. Von der kühlen Geschäftslogik zur spontanen Gefälligkeit. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 1, 77-102.Google Scholar
  34. Kohlberg, L. & Lickona, T. (1986). The stages of ethical development: From childhood to old age. San Francisco: Harper.Google Scholar
  35. LaRossa, R. & LaRossa, M. M. (1981). Transition to parenthood. How infants change families. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Lazarus, R. S. (1975). A cognitively oriented psychologist looks at feedback. American Psychologist, 30, 553–561.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lerner, M. J. (1970). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1-52.Google Scholar
  38. Lerner, M. J. (1981). The justice motive in human relations. Some thoughts on what we know and need to know about justice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 11–35 ). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  39. Lerner, M. J. & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030-1151.Google Scholar
  40. Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T. & Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 134–162 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lerner, M. J. & Mikula, G. (1994) (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond. Justice in close relationships. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  42. Lerner, M. J. & Whitehead, L. (1980). Procedural justice viewed in the context of justice motive theory. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction: Experimental and theoretical contributions from psychological research (pp. 219–256 ). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  43. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg & R. Willis (Eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55 ). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Levenson, H. (1972). Distinctions within the concept of internal-external control: Development of a new scale. Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of The American Psychological Association, 7, 261–262.Google Scholar
  45. Lind, A. E. & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  46. Lück, H. E. & Timaeus, E. (1969). Skalen zur Messung Manifester Angst (MAS) und sozialer Wünschbarkeit ( SDS-E und SDS-CM ). Diagnostica, 15, 134–141.Google Scholar
  47. Martin, J., Brickman, P. & Murray, A. (1984). Moral outrage and pragmatism: Explanations for collective action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 484–496.Google Scholar
  48. Mikula, G. (1980). On the role of justice in allocation decisions. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction: Experimental and theoretical contributions from psychological research (pp. 127–166 ). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  49. Mikula, G. (1987). Exploring the experience of injustice. In G. R. Semin & B. Krahé (Eds.), Issues in contemporary German social psychology: History, theories, and applications (pp. 74–96 ). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Mikula, G. (1992). Austausch und Gerechtigkeit in Freundschaft, Partnerschaft und Ehe: Ein Überblick über den aktuellen Forschungsstand. Psychologische Rundschau, 43, 69–82.Google Scholar
  51. Mikula, G. & Lerner, M. J. (1994). Justice in close relationships. An introduction. In M. J. Lerner & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond. Justice in close relationships (pp. 1–9 ). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  52. Mitleger, R. & Rathgeber, R. (1988). Der mühsame Weg zur Gleichberechtigung. Das Eherecht. In K. Leube, L. Pagenstecher, R. Rathgeber, J. Stich & K. Wahl (Eds.), Wie geht’s der Familie? Ein Handbuch zur Situation der Familien heute (pp. 415–424 ). München: Koesel.Google Scholar
  53. Montada, L. (1980). Developmental changes in concepts of justice. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction: Experimental and theoretical contributions from psychological research (pp. 257–284 ). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  54. Montada, L. (1989). Bildung der Gefühle? [On the formation of emotions]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 35, 292–312.Google Scholar
  55. Montada, L., Schmitt, M. & Delbert, C. (1986). Thinking about justice and dealing with one’s own privileges: A study of existential guilt. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. Cohen & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 125–142 ). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Montada, L. & Schneider, A. (1990). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Oberndörfer, R. (1993). Aufgabenteilung in Partnerschaften. In B. Nauck (Ed.), Lebensgestaltung von Frauen: eine Regionalanalyse von Familien-und Erwerbstätigkeit im Lebensverlauf (pp. 145–175 ). Weinheim: Juventa.Google Scholar
  58. Ortony, A., Clore, G. L. & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambrige Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgement of the child. New York: Free Press. Reichle, B. ( 1993 ). Injustice does not always matter: The case of restrictions in the course of first childbirth. Paper presented at the IVth InternationalGoogle Scholar
  60. Conference on Social Justice Research, Trier, Germany, July 2nd, 1993. Reichle, B. (1994a). Die Geburt des ersten Kindes — eine Herausforderung für dieGoogle Scholar
  61. Partnerschaft. Bielefeld: Kleine.Google Scholar
  62. Reichle, B. (1994b). Die Zuschreibung von Verantwortlichkeit für negative Ereignisse in Partnerschaften: Ein Modell und erste empirische Befunde. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 227-237.Google Scholar
  63. Reichle, B. (1995). Lebensveränderungen nach der Geburt des ersten Kindes: Reaktionen und Bewältigung. Paper presented at the VIIIth Coping Workshop, Mannheim, Germany, March 24th, 1995.Google Scholar
  64. Reichle, B. & Gefke, M. (1995). Just distributions among spouses: Preferences and patterns. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  65. Reichle, B., & Montada, L. (1994). Problems with the transition to parenthood: Perceived responsibility for restrictions and losses and the experience of injustice. In M. J. Lerner & G. Mikula (Eds.), Justice in close relationships: Entitlement and the affectional bond (pp. 205–228 ). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  66. Reis, H. T. (1984). The multidimensionality of justice. In R. Folger (Ed.), The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 25–61 ). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reskin, B. E (1994). Sex segregation: Explaining stability and change in the sex composition of work. In P. Beckmann & G. Engelbrech (Eds.), Arbeitsmarkt für Frauen 2000 — Ein Schritt vor oder ein Schritt zurück? Kompendium zur Erwerbstätigkeit von Frauen (pp. 97-115). (Beiträge zur Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung 179 ). Nürnberg: Institut für Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung der Bundesanstalt für Arbeit.Google Scholar
  68. Roseman, I. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion. A structural theory. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, Vol. 5: Emotions, relationships, and health (pp. 11–36 ). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  69. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, (Nr.1, whole Nr. 609), 1–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Rusbult, C. (1987). Responses to dissatisfaction in close relationships: The exit-voice-loyalty-neglect model. In D. Perlman & S. Duck (Eds.), Intimate relationships (pp. 209–237 ). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  71. Sampson, E. E. (1975). On justice as equality. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 45-64. Scherer, K. R. ( 1984 ). On the nature and function of emotion: A componentGoogle Scholar
  72. process approach. In K. A. Scherer & R. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches toGoogle Scholar
  73. emotion (pp. 293-317). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  74. Schmitt, M. (1994). Gerechtigkeit [Justice]. In M. Hockel, W. Molt & L. von Rosenstiel (Eds.), Handbuch der Angewandten Psychologie (Kap. VII.10) [Handbook of Applied Psychology] (Chap. VII. 10 ). Munich: Ecomed.Google Scholar
  75. Schmitt, M. & Montada, L. (1982). Determinanten erlebter Gerechtigkeit [Determinants of experienced justice]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 13, 3244.Google Scholar
  76. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  77. Schwinger, T. (1980). Just allocation of goods: Decisions among three principles. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction: Experimental and theoretical contributions from psychological research (pp. 95–125 ). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  78. Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101–113.Google Scholar
  79. Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Smith, C. A. & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sprecher, S. & Schwartz, P. (1994). Equity and balance in the exchange of contributions in close relationships. In M. J. Lerner & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond. Justice in close relationships (pp. 11–41 ). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  82. Statistisches Bundesamt (Ed.). (1991). BMFuS Erziehungsgeld-Statistik 1989 vom 18.2. 1991. Unpublished Tables. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar
  83. Steil, J. M. (1994). Equality and entitlement in marriage: Benefits and barriers. In M. J. Lerner & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond. Justice in close relationships (pp. 229–258 ). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  84. Steil, J. M. & Makowski, D. G. (1989). Equity, equality, and need: A study of the patterns and outcomes associated with their use in intimate relationships. Social Justice Research, 3, 121–137.Google Scholar
  85. Steil, J. M. & Slochower, J. (1985). The experience of injustice. Social psychological and clinical perspectives. In G. Stricker & R. H. Reisner (Eds.), Form research to clinical practise (pp. 217–242 ). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Steil, J. M. & Turetsky, B. (1987). Is equal better? The relationship between marital equality and psychological symptomatology. In. S. Oskamp (Ed.), Applied Social Psychology Annual (pp. 73–97 ). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  87. Thibaut, J. W. & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  88. Thibaut, J. W. & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  89. Thompson, L. (1991). Family Work. Women’s sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 181-196.Google Scholar
  90. Törnblom, K. Y. (1992). The social psychology of distributive justice. In K. R. Scherer (Ed.), Justice: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 177–284 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Törnblom, K. Y., Jonsson, D.R. & Foa, U.G. (1985). Nationality, resource class, and preferences among three allocation rules: Sweden vs. USA. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9, 51–77.Google Scholar
  92. Utne, M. K. & Kidd, R. E (1980). Equity and attribution. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction: Experimental and theoretical contributions from psychological research (pp. 63–93 ). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  93. VanYperen, N. W. & Buunk, B. P. (1990). A longitudinal study of equity and satisfaction in intimate relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Walster, E., Walster, G. W. & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  95. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wissenschaftlicher Beirat für Familienfragen beim Bundesministerium für Jugend, Familie und Gesundheit. (1984). Familie und Arbeitswelt. Schriftenreihe des Bundesministers für Jugend, Familie und Gesundheit; Bd. 143 ). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Reichle
    • 1
  1. 1.Fb I — PsychologieUniversitaet TrierTrierGermany

Personalised recommendations