Intergenerational Relations, Inequality, and Social Justice

  • Karen S. Cook
  • Shawn Donnelly
Part of the Critical Issues in Social Justice book series (CISJ)


Various authors have recently begun to connect the literatures on intergenerational relations and gerontology with the work on social justice (e.g., Norris, 1987). This chapter attempts to relate two specific literatures within this broader field of current research. We take one of the dominant theoretical perspectives in Sociology, social exchange theory, and extend it to apply to intergenerational relations.


Social Exchange Saving Rate Generalize Exchange Coalition Formation American Sociological Review 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barry, B. (1989). Theories of justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brickman, P. Foler, R. Goode, E. & Schul,Y. (1981). Microjustice and macrojustice. In M. J. Lerner and S. C. Lerner (eds.),The justice in social behavior (pp. 173–202 ). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brubaker, T. H. (1990). An overview of family relationships in later life. In T. H. Brubaker (ed.), Family relationships in later life. ( 2nd Ed., pp. 13–26 ) Newbury Park CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Brubaker, E., Gorman, M. A. & Hiestand, M. (1990). Stress perceived by elderly recipients of family care. In T. H. Brubaker (ed.), Family relationships in later life ( 2nd Ed., pp. 267–281 ) Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Burgess, R. L. & Nielsen, J. M. (1974). An experimental analysis of some structural determinants of equitable and inequitable exchange relations. American Sociological Review, 39, 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cicirelli, V. G. (1990) Family support in relation to health problems of the elderly. In T. H. Brubaker (ed.) Family relationships in later life. ( 2nd ed., pp. 212–228 ) Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Cook, K. S. (ed.). (1987). Social exchange theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Cook, K. S. and Emerson, R.M. (1978). Power, equity, and commitment in ex- change networks. American Sociological Review, 43, 721–739.Google Scholar
  8. Cook, K. S., Emerson, R. M., Gillmore, M. R. & Yamagishi, T. (1983). The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results.“ American Journal of Sociology, 9, 275–305.Google Scholar
  9. Cook, K. S., Molm, L. D. & Yamagishi, T. (1993). Exchange relations and exchange networks: Recent developments in social exchange theory. In J. Berger and M. Zelditch (eds.). Theoretical research programs: Studies in the growth of theory (pp. 296. 322 ).Google Scholar
  10. Cook, K. S. & J. Whitmeyer. 1992. “Two approaches to social structure: exchange theory and network analysis. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 109–127.Google Scholar
  11. Daniels, N. (1988). Am I my parents keeper? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dowd, J. J. (1975). Aging as exchange: A preface to theory.“ Journal of Gerontology, 30, 584–594.Google Scholar
  13. Dowed, J. J. (1978). Aging as exchange: A test of the distributive justice proposition. Pacific Sociological Review, 21, 351–375.Google Scholar
  14. Dowed, J. J. (1980). Exchange rates and old people. Journal of Gerontology, 35, 596–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dowed, J. J. (1987). Justice in old age: An analysis of corporatist social theory. Social Justice Research, 1,: 477–499.Google Scholar
  16. Ekeh, P. P. (1974). Social exchange theory: The two traditions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations.“ American Sociological Review, 27, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emerson, R. M. (1972a). Exchange theory, Part I: A psychological basis for social exchange. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch and B. Anderson (eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, pp. 38–57 ). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  19. Emerson, R. M. (1972b). Exchange theory, Part II: Exchange relations and networks.“ in J. Berger, M. Zelditch and B. Anderson (eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, pp. 58–7 ). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  20. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Emerson, R. M. (1981). Social exchange theory. In M. Rosenberg and R. Turner (eds.) Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 30–5).ew York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity.“ American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hesse-Biber, S., and Williamson, J. (1984). Resource theory and power in families: Life cycle considerations. Family Process, 23, 261–278.Google Scholar
  24. Kendig, H. (1986). Aging families and social change. In H. L. Kendig (ed.), Aging and families: A support networks perspective (pp. 169–185 ). Sidney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  25. Kahana, E., Midlarsky, E. and Kahana,B. (1987). Beyond dependency, autonomy, and exchange: Prosocial behavior in late-life adaptation.“ Social Justice Research, 1, 439–459.Google Scholar
  26. Kingson E. R., Hirshorn, B. A. & Cornman, J. M. (1986). Ties that bind: The interdependence of generations. Washington D.C.: Seven Locks.Google Scholar
  27. Lerner, M. J. & Lemer, S. C. (eds.). (1981). The justice motive in social behavior. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  28. Levi-Strauss, C. (1969). The elementary structures of kinship. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lewis. R. A.. (1990). The adult child and older parents. In T. H. Brubaker (ed.), Family relationships in later life. ( 2nd Ed., pp. 68–85 ) Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Longman, P. (1987). Born to pay: The new politics of aging in America. Boston: Houghton Miffl in Company.Google Scholar
  31. Malinowski. B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  32. Matthews, S. H. & T. T. Rosner (1988). Shared filial responsibility: the family as the primary caregiver.“ Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 185–195.Google Scholar
  33. Molm, L. D. (1987). Power-dependence theory: Power processes and negative outcomes. In E. J. Lawler and B. Markovsky (eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 4, pp. 171–198 ) Greenwich. CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  34. Molm, L. D. (1988). The Structure and use of power: A comparison of reward and punishment power.“ Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 108–122.Google Scholar
  35. Molm, L. D. (1989). Punishment power. A balancing process in power-depend-ence relations. “ American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1392–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Norris, J. E. (1987). Justice and intergenerational relations: An introduction. Social Justice Research, 1, 393–403.Google Scholar
  37. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rawls, J. (1972). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Sahlins, M. ( 1972 ). Stone age economics. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  39. Tíindale, J. A. & Neysmith, S. M. (1987). Economic justice in later life: A Canadian perspective.“ Social Justice Research, 1, 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walster, E., Walster, W. & Bersheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  41. Yamagishi, T., Gillmore, M. R. & Cook, K.S. (1988). Network connections and the distribution of power in exchange networks. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 833–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yamagishi, T. & Cook, K. S. (1993). Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly. 56, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen S. Cook
    • 1
  • Shawn Donnelly
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations