Putting Systems Theory into Practice and Vice Versa

The Role of Observation in Analysing the Real World
  • Sam Waters
  • George Bakehouse
  • Christopher Davis
  • Kevin Doyle

Abstract

This paper seeks to explore the extent to which conventional social scientific research techniques can be productively applied to the notionally specialist task of systems analysis. Specifically, the paper examines the contribution of participant observation to the process of organisation analysis. Our aim is to critically examine both the process of analysis and observational techniques in order to identify opportunities for their exploitation. The significant results of some action research in a leading neurosurgery department where observation was the main investigative technique are reported. The complementarity of those results to those generated by more regularly used techniques is discussed.

Keywords

Participant Observation Health Service Executive United Kingdom Introduction Advanced Sector Strategic Review 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakehouse, G., Davis, C., Doyle, K., and Waters, S., 1994, Anthropological Reflections on Systems Engineering: Seeing is Believing. Proceedings, Conference on the Philosophical and Logical Aspects of Information Systems, Bristol.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, H., 1963, “Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance”, The Free Press, NY.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, J., 1987, “Doing Your Research Project”, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, C., 1994, Getting Better with Information Systems. Proceedings, PICT International Doctoral Colloquiu, Policy Studies Institute, London.Google Scholar
  5. DeMarco, T., 1978, “Structured Analysis and System Specification”, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  6. Digital Equipment Corporation, 1992, “Frenchay Trust: An Integrated Neurosurgery Strategy and IS Strategy”. Frenchay Healthcare NHS Trust, 1994, “Project Evaluation Report: Integrated Clinical Workstation for Neurosciences”Google Scholar
  7. Galliers, R., 1992, “Information Systems Research”, Blackwell Scientific, London.Google Scholar
  8. Goffman, E., 1961, “Asylums”, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  9. Land, F., 1992, “The Information Systems Domain” (unpublished paper, London School of Economics), London.Google Scholar
  10. McCall, G., and Simmons, J., 1969, “Issues in Participant Observation”, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  11. McKinney, J., 1966, “Constructive Typology and Social Theory”, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Mackintosh, I., Waters, S., Bakehouse, G., Davis, C., and Doyle, K., 1994, “Integrated Clinical Workstation: User Requirements for a Neurosciences Directorate” NHS Information Management Group (forthcoming) NHS Executive, Leeds.Google Scholar
  13. National Health Service Management Executive, 1992, “Information Management and Technology Strategy Overview” HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  14. Oliver, I. & Langford, H., 1984, “Myths of Demons and Users” in: Galliers R., (ed.), 1987, “Information Requirements Analysis: Selected Readings”, Addison-Wesley, Sydney.Google Scholar
  15. Polsky, N., 1967, “Hustlers, Beats and Others”, Aldine, NY.Google Scholar
  16. Valusek, J., and Fryback, D., 1985, Information Requirements Determination: Obstacles Within, Among and Between Participants, Proceedings, End-User Computing Conference, ACM pp103-110.Google Scholar
  17. Waters, S., 1989, SWOT analysis in IT projects, International CIS Journal, Vol 3 No 1, pp.20–29.Google Scholar
  18. Waters, S., 1994, “Information Management Problems: Towards a Cross-Sectoral Perspective”, Health Economics Consortium, York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sam Waters
    • 1
  • George Bakehouse
    • 1
  • Christopher Davis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kevin Doyle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ComputingUniversity of the West of England, BristolBristolEngland
  2. 2.Information Management GroupUniversity of Glamorgan Business SchoolPontypridd, Mid GlamorganWales, UK

Personalised recommendations