Using a Formal Model as a Meta-Model in the Analysis of Team Behavior in Organizations

  • R. W. Stewart


Many organisations, in response to rapidly changing environments, are adopting structural strategies that are dependant upon the creation and operation of ‘teams’ in order to achieve the flexibility of operation and responsiveness required by their market place and customers. The behaviour of these teams will often determine the effectiveness and success of the organisation as a whole, hence the understanding of how teams work in their own organisation is an important part of assessing the effectiveness of organisational performance.


Team Member Formal Model Feedforward Control Informational Communication Behavioural Paradigm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baron, R. A., Greenberg, J., 1990, “Behaviour in Organisations”, Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights.Google Scholar
  2. Fortune, J., and Peters, G., 1990, The formal system paradigm for studying failures, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 2:383–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., and Donnelly, J. H., 1994, “Organizations: Behaviour, Structure, Processes”, 8th ed., Irwin. Boston.Google Scholar
  4. Stewart, R.W., 1994, Behaviour and communication analysis of command and control teams, Journal of Naval Science. 20:164–174.Google Scholar
  5. Stewart, R.W., 1991, The use of social paradigms in the analysis of team behaviour during organisational change, in: “Systems Thinking in Europe”, Jackson, M. C., Mansell, G.J., Flood, R.L., Blackham, R.B., and Probert, S.V.E., Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Stewart, R.W., 1992, The impact on the decision making process in organisations resulting from structural change in response to dynamic changing environments, in: “IDASCO 1992”, IEEE353, London.Google Scholar
  7. Tuckman, B., Jenson, N., 1977, Stages of small group development revisited, Group and Organizational Studies, 2:419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. W. Stewart
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information SystemsKingston UniversitySurreyUK

Personalised recommendations