The Power of Distinctions
Power is one of the crucial issues in Critical Systems Thinking. It is connected with the position of that approach for “...human well-being and emancipation” (Flood and Jackson, 1991: 49). As is well known, there are differences in the way that critical systems thinkers view the subject of emancipation (Flood and Ulrich, 1990; Jackson, 1985, 1990). However, as their main concern is a redefinition of Management and Systems Sciences, as well as the provision of theoretical and practical principles for the functioning of a critical systems methodology based on dialogue and on critical self-reflective action, they sought mainly theoretical support in the Habermasian analysis for distorted communication. Therefore, in their writings, the notion of power is not the outcome of an original work, but rather a notion borrowed primarily from the theoretical project of Habermas, and secondarily from that of Foucault. An exception could be considered Oliga’s endeavor to deal with the concept of power as he attempted to inquire into the phenomena of stability and change of social systems (Oliga, 1990(a), 1990(b)).
KeywordsOperational Domain Critical System System Practice Objective Interest Critical System Thinking
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Canetti, E., 1962, “Crowds and Power,” Gollancz, London.Google Scholar
- Cooper, R., 1983, Canetti’s sting, unpublished, Department of Behaviour, University of Lancaster, Lancaster.Google Scholar
- Espejo, R., 1993, Domains of interactions between a social system and its environment, in: “A Challenge for Systems Thinking,” I. Tsivacou, ed., University of the Aegean Press, Athens.Google Scholar
- Flood, R.L., and Jackson, M.C., 1991, “Creative Problem Solving,” John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
- Habermas, J., 1972, “Knowledge and Human Interests,” Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, N., 1990(a), The autopoiesis of social systems, in: “Essays on Self-Reference,” Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, N., 1990(b), Meaning as sociology’ s basic concept, in: “Essays on Self-Reference,” Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Lukes, S., 1974, “Power: A Radical View,” Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
- Maturana, H., 1987, Everything is said by an observer, in: “Gaia: A Way of Knowing,” W.I. Thompson, ed., Lindisfarme Press, California.Google Scholar
- Von Foerster, H., 1979, Cybernetics in cybernetics, in: “Communications and Control in Society,” K. Krippendorff, ed., Gordon and Breach, New York.Google Scholar