Politics versus Learning?

  • Jane A. O. Young

Abstract

Peter Checkland (1981) has claimed that the literary references used as keynotes to his work are of primary importance, a communications device to enhance the understanding of the reader. Mindful of this, and the claim in Habermas (1972) that every experience of cognitive significance is poetic, it seems appropriate to follow the example. The key to the action research work detailed here, is the belief that trying to understand a situation, and communicating that understanding might help others, while appreciating the anxieties and fears of those involved in the situation. The quotation, which seems most apt, almost a frame of reference for the ‘action researcher’, is borrowed from Flood & Jackson (1991), where it is used as an introduction to Total Systems Intervention (TSI).

Keywords

Organizational Politics Soft System Methodology Cognitive Significance United Kingdom Introduction Management Support System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, C.J., 1986, Towards a plurality of soft systems methodology, Journal of Applied Systems Analysis. 13:19:31.Google Scholar
  2. Bennis, W., Benne, K., Chin, R. and Corey, K., 1976, “The Planning of Change”, Holt Reinhart & Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Checkland, P.B., 1981, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  4. Checkland, P.B. and Scholes J., 1990, Systems Thinking in Action, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  5. De Geus, A., 1 988, Planning as learning, Harvard Business Review Vol 66:2. @REFAUSTY = Easterby-Smith M., 1991, Creating a learning organization, Personnel Review. Vol.19.Google Scholar
  6. Flood, R.L. and & Jackson, M.C., 1991, “Creative Problem Solving”, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  7. Habermas, J., 1972, “Knowledge & Human Interests,” Heinmann, London.Google Scholar
  8. Handy, C., 1994, “The Empty Raincoat”, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  9. Morgan, G., 1986, “Images of Organization”, Sage, Newbury Park, California.Google Scholar
  10. Schein, E., 1980, “Organizational Psychology”, Prentice Hall, London.Google Scholar
  11. Schein, E., 1986, “Organizational Culture & Leadership”, Jossey Bass, San Fransisco.Google Scholar
  12. Senge, P.M. 1990, “The Fifth Discipline”, Century, London.Google Scholar
  13. Vickers, G., 1983, “Human Systems are Different”, Harper & Row, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane A. O. Young
    • 1
  1. 1.Leeds Business SchoolLeeds Metropolitan UniversityLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations