Representation and Double-Level Language in Information Systems

  • Robert Stephens


A recent theme in some contemporary research suggests that organizational realities and structures endure to the extent they are made and remade in social praxis. Accordingly, effective information systems development and operation depends on a subtle interplay of the technical and social. Viability is thus sustained not by appeal to a pre-ordained organizational structure, but in a linguistically mediated cycle of assimilation and accommodation. In this paper we seek to capture this notion by examining representation as both synchronic and diachronic, and developing the concept of ‘double-level language’ to describe how formal and informal languages are mutually supportive.


Computer Support Cooperative Work Organizational Reality Subtle Interplay Informal Language Ostensive Definition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Argyris, C., 1987, Some inner contradictions in management information systems, in: R. Galliers ed., “Information Analysis: Selected Readings”, Addison-Wesley, Singapore.Google Scholar
  2. Blair, D.C., 1990, “Language and Representation in Information Retrieval”, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  3. Blackler, F., 1993, Knowledge and the theory of organizations: organizations as activity systems and the reframing of management, Journal of Management Studies. 30 (6): 863–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boland, R.J., 1979, Control, Causality and Information System Requirements, Accounting, Organizations and Society. 4 (5): 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boland, R. J. and Hirschheim, R. A., eds., 1987, “Critical Issues in Information Systems Research”, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  6. Bowers, J.M., 1991, Time, representation and power/knowledge: towards a critique of cognitive science as a knowledge-producing practice, Theory and Psychology. 1(4): 543–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper, R., 1992, Formal organization as representation: remote control, displacement and abbreviation: Organization theory in the postmodern era, in: “Rethinking Organization: New Directions in Organization Theory and Analysis”, M. Reed and M. Hughes, eds., Sage, London.Google Scholar
  8. Law, J., 1994, “Organizing Modernity”, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Lyytinen, K., 1985, Implications of Theories of Language for Information Systems, MIS Quarterly. March: 61-74.Google Scholar
  10. Nardi, B.A., and Miller, J.R., 1990, An Ethnographic study of distributed problem solving in spreadsheet development, in: Proceedings of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work ’90, ACM, October, 1990, 197-208.Google Scholar
  11. Preston, A. M., 1991, The “problem” in and of management information systems, Accounting, Management and Information Technology. Vol. 1 (1): 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Robinson, M., 1991, Double-Level Languages and Co-operative Working, AI and Society. 5: 34–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sinha, C., 1988, “Language and Representation: A Socio-naturalistic Approach to Human Development”, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.Google Scholar
  14. Stamper, R., 1987, Semantics, in: R. Boland and R.A. Hirschheim, eds. op. cit.Google Scholar
  15. Suchman, L.A., 1987, “Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-machine Interaction”, Cambridge Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Truex, D. P. and Klein, H. K., 1991, A rejection of structure as a basis for information systems development, in: R. K. Stamper, P. Kerola, R. Lee, and K. Lyytinen, eds., “Collaborative Work, Social Communications and Information Systems”, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  17. Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E., 1991, “The Embodied Mind: Cognitive science and Human Experience”, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. Weick, K., 1979, “The Social Psychology of Organizing”, Addison-Wesley, Reading, M.A.Google Scholar
  19. Winograd, T. and Flores, F., 1986, “Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design”, Addison-Wesley, Reading, M.A.Google Scholar
  20. Wittgenstein, L., 1963, “Philosophical Investigations”, (translated by G. E. Anscombe), Blackwel, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Zuboff, S., 1989, “In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power”, Heinemann, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Stephens
    • 1
  1. 1.Bristol Transputer Centre, Faculty of Computer Studies and MathematicsUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolUK

Personalised recommendations