Skip to main content

Incorporating Individual Differences in Perspective in a Systemic Approach to Information Systems Requirements Analysis

  • Chapter
  • 19 Accesses

Abstract

Investment in information systems (IS) and information technology (IT) in contemporary organisations is both widespread and substantial. There are few businesses today that can operate effectively and competitively without resorting to at least minimal reliance on IS/IT as an integral part of day to day operations. For most, investment in IS/IT now represents a significant proportion of capital and operating expenditures. Indeed, for these organisations, seeing adequate returns on their investments has now become a pressing management issue (Ward et al., 1990). Hence it can be concluded that information systems development (ISD), whether this is defined as developing computer-based systems from first principles, or tailoring off-the-shelf packages, or some variant of these two extremes, is a common, necessary and important process in most contemporary organisations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackermann, F., Cropper, S., Eden, C., and Cook, J., 1991, Cognitive Mapping for Policy analysis in the Public Sector. Paper presented at the American Academy of Management Conference, Miami, USA, August 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R.A., and Greenberg, J., 1990, “Behavior in Organizations: Understanding and Managing the Human Side of Work,” Allyn & Bacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., 1981, “Systems Thinking, Systems Practice,” John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G.B., 1992, Systems analysis and design: a research strategy macro-analysis, in: “Challenges and Strategies for Research in Systems Development,” W.W. Cotterman and J.A. Senn, eds., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumdum, U.R., and Klein, H.K., 1986, The need for organizational requirements analysis, in: “Quality of work versus quality of information systems,” H.E. Nissen, and G. Sandstrom, eds., Report of the Ninth Scandinavian Research Seminar on Systemeering, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eason, K., 1988, “Information Technology and Organisational Change,” Taylor & Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., 1988, Cognitive mapping, European Journal of Operational Research, 36:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., 1989, Using cognitive mapping for strategic options development and analysis, in: “Rational analysis for a problematic world,” J. Rosenhead, ed., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., 1990, Strategic thinking with computers, Long Range Planning, 23:35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., 1993, On evaluating the performance of “wide-band” GDSS’s, Unpublished paper, Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, D.J., 1992, “Information Systems Requirements: Determination and Analysis,” McGraw-Hill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, S.G., 1994, Practical software quality assurance, Institute of Internal Auditors Australia, National Conference, Perth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliers, R.D., 1993, Information systems and business reengineering, Paper presented at IFORS’ 93, Lisbon, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R.A., 1985, “Office Automation: a Social and Organizational Perspective,” John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holwell, S., 1992, SSM information approach: a critique, Systemist 14: 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limayem, M., and Wanninger, L.A., 1993, The use of a group CASE tool to improve information requirements determination, Document de Travail 93-33, Universite Laval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, P.H., Atkinson, D.J., Ee, L.P., and McKay, J.A., 1993, Computer-aided group problem solving: an overview of successful methodologies, The Environmental Professional, 15:159–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, J.A., 1995, The application of soft management science/operational research to information systems requirements analysis: a study using cognitive mapping and the SODA methodology, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Curtin University of Technology, in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, J., Marshall, P., and McDermid, D., 1994, Cognitive mapping for information requirements determination in the learning organisation, in: “Proceedings of the 17th IRIS Conference”, Syote.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, E., 1981, Participative systems design: structure and method, Systems, Objectives, Solutions 1: 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, I. and Langford, H., 1987, Myths of demons and users: evidence and analysis of negative perceptions of users, in: “Information analysis: selected readings,” R. Galliers, ed., Addison-Wesley, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, R., 1992, Linking SSM and IS Development, Systemist, 14: 128–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanninger, L.A., and Dickson, G.W., 1992a, GRIP — Group requirement identification process: the integration of GDSS technology into the systems development life cycle, in: “Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science Vol III,” J.F. Nunamaker, ed., IEEE, Los Alamitos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanninger, L.A., and Dickson, G.W., 1992b, Phased systems design, development, and implementation: process and technology, in: “The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies on Information Systems Development,” K.E. Kendall et al., eds., Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J., Griffiths, P., and Whitmore, P., 1990, “Strategic Planning for Information Systems,” John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B., 1989, A systems methodology for information requirements analysis, in: “Systems Development for Human Progress,” H.K. Klein and K. Kumar, eds., Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McKay, J., Marshall, P.H. (1995). Incorporating Individual Differences in Perspective in a Systemic Approach to Information Systems Requirements Analysis. In: Ellis, K., Gregory, A., Mears-Young, B.R., Ragsdell, G. (eds) Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9883-8_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9883-8_57

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9885-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9883-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics