System Pictures

Towards a Tool for Information Systems Analysis
  • Angus J. Quin
  • Malcolm Bronte-Stewart


Some of the perennial difficulties experienced in analysing situations in an organisation include: identifying and learning about the existing sub-systems and problems, and recording these ideas in a form that is understood by all the people involved. These concerns are aggravated when considering large and complex industrial, commercial and public service systems. Trying to find out about the situation and gathering information from everyone involved is usually difficult, especially since individuals may have different opinions of what is causing the problems, and their own perception of the role they play in the organisation.


District Council General System Theory Viable System Model Diagrammatic Approach Knowledge Elicitation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balin, S. C., 1989, An object oriented requirements specification method, Communications of the ACM, 32:5.Google Scholar
  2. Beer, S. A., 1985, “Diagnosing the System for Organisations”, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, G. S., 1969, “Laws of Form”, George Allen and Unwin Ltd, London.Google Scholar
  4. Checkland, P.B., 1981, “Systems Thinking, Systems Practice”, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  5. Coad, P., and Yourdon, E., 1991, “Object-Oriented Analysis,” Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  6. Coad, P., and Yourdon, E., 1991, “Object-Oriented Design”, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  7. De Marco, T., 1978, “Structured Analysis and System Specification”, Yourdon Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Dilthey, W., 1976, “Selected Writings”, H. P. Rickman, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Earl, M.J., 1989, Management Strategics for Information Technology, Prentice-Hall, London.Google Scholar
  10. Gane, C., and Sarson, T., 1979, “Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques”, Prentice-Hall, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  11. Harrisons Clyde Ltd., 1991, Report of consultancy project under the auspices of the Enterprise Initiative, Department of Trade and Industry. M. Bronte-Stewart, D. McDermid.Google Scholar
  12. McDcrmid, D., 1990, “Software Engineering for Information Systems”, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. MRCA, 1967–1974, Multi Role Combat Aircraft, British Aerospace Panavia Contract. Open University, 1984, T301 Block 1, Complexity, management and change: applying a systems approach. Introduction Workbook.Google Scholar
  14. Peterson, J. L., 1981, “Petri-Net Theory and the Modelling of Systems”, Prentice-Hall, London.Google Scholar
  15. Quin, A. J., 1993, Cybernetics in management, in: “Systems Science: Addressing Global Issues”, F. A. Stowell, D. West, J. G. Howell, eds., Plenum. New York.Google Scholar
  16. Quin, A. J., and Bronte-Stewart, M., 1994, System pictures: a method for capturing clients’ views, Systemist, 16:4.Google Scholar
  17. Renfrew District Council, 1990, Consultancy report on the proposal for an Information System for the Building and Works Department of Renfrew District Council, R. Frew, M. Bronte-Stewart, and D. McDermid.Google Scholar
  18. Ross, D., and Schoman, K., 1977, Structured analysis for requirements definition, IEEE Transactions on software engineering, 3:1.Google Scholar
  19. Stowell, F. A., West, D., Smith, S. A. and Begg, C. E., 1995, Decision-making in mental health care: towards a technology based decision support aid, in: “Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice”, K. Ellis, A. Gregory, B. Mears-Young and G. Ragsdell, eds., Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Viekers, G., 1965, “The Art of Judgement”, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  21. von Bertalanffy, L., 1968, “General Systems Theory”, Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Waring, A., 1989, “Systems Methods For Managers: A Practical Guide”, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. West. D. 1991, “Towards a subjective knowledge elicitation methodology for the development of expert systems”. Unpublished PhD thesis. Portsmouth Polytechnic.Google Scholar
  24. Wynn, E. W., 1989, Spencer Brown Logic: The prepositional calculus through metalogic, Systemist, 12:1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angus J. Quin
    • 1
  • Malcolm Bronte-Stewart
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computing and Information SystemsUniversity of PaisleyPaisleyUK

Personalised recommendations