Skip to main content

System Pictures

Towards a Tool for Information Systems Analysis

  • Chapter
Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice

Abstract

Some of the perennial difficulties experienced in analysing situations in an organisation include: identifying and learning about the existing sub-systems and problems, and recording these ideas in a form that is understood by all the people involved. These concerns are aggravated when considering large and complex industrial, commercial and public service systems. Trying to find out about the situation and gathering information from everyone involved is usually difficult, especially since individuals may have different opinions of what is causing the problems, and their own perception of the role they play in the organisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balin, S. C., 1989, An object oriented requirements specification method, Communications of the ACM, 32:5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. A., 1985, “Diagnosing the System for Organisations”, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. S., 1969, “Laws of Form”, George Allen and Unwin Ltd, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P.B., 1981, “Systems Thinking, Systems Practice”, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coad, P., and Yourdon, E., 1991, “Object-Oriented Analysis,” Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coad, P., and Yourdon, E., 1991, “Object-Oriented Design”, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Marco, T., 1978, “Structured Analysis and System Specification”, Yourdon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W., 1976, “Selected Writings”, H. P. Rickman, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, M.J., 1989, Management Strategics for Information Technology, Prentice-Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gane, C., and Sarson, T., 1979, “Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques”, Prentice-Hall, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrisons Clyde Ltd., 1991, Report of consultancy project under the auspices of the Enterprise Initiative, Department of Trade and Industry. M. Bronte-Stewart, D. McDermid.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDcrmid, D., 1990, “Software Engineering for Information Systems”, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • MRCA, 1967–1974, Multi Role Combat Aircraft, British Aerospace Panavia Contract. Open University, 1984, T301 Block 1, Complexity, management and change: applying a systems approach. Introduction Workbook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. L., 1981, “Petri-Net Theory and the Modelling of Systems”, Prentice-Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quin, A. J., 1993, Cybernetics in management, in: “Systems Science: Addressing Global Issues”, F. A. Stowell, D. West, J. G. Howell, eds., Plenum. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quin, A. J., and Bronte-Stewart, M., 1994, System pictures: a method for capturing clients’ views, Systemist, 16:4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew District Council, 1990, Consultancy report on the proposal for an Information System for the Building and Works Department of Renfrew District Council, R. Frew, M. Bronte-Stewart, and D. McDermid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D., and Schoman, K., 1977, Structured analysis for requirements definition, IEEE Transactions on software engineering, 3:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, F. A., West, D., Smith, S. A. and Begg, C. E., 1995, Decision-making in mental health care: towards a technology based decision support aid, in: “Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice”, K. Ellis, A. Gregory, B. Mears-Young and G. Ragsdell, eds., Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viekers, G., 1965, “The Art of Judgement”, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L., 1968, “General Systems Theory”, Braziller, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, A., 1989, “Systems Methods For Managers: A Practical Guide”, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • West. D. 1991, “Towards a subjective knowledge elicitation methodology for the development of expert systems”. Unpublished PhD thesis. Portsmouth Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, E. W., 1989, Spencer Brown Logic: The prepositional calculus through metalogic, Systemist, 12:1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Quin, A.J., Bronte-Stewart, M. (1995). System Pictures. In: Ellis, K., Gregory, A., Mears-Young, B.R., Ragsdell, G. (eds) Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9883-8_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9883-8_50

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9885-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9883-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics