Why Is Systemic Thinking ‘Difficult to Sell’?
Systemic thinking has, as input; (a) a “Weltanschauung” or world view; (b) General Systems Theory or GST; and (c) the experiences and problems of the real world. As output, it has (a) human attitudes and behaviour; and (b) solutions to organizational or socio-political problems or issues. This input-output analysis of a discipline is inspired by Van Gigch and Pipino (1986).
KeywordsSystem Approach Mutual Causality Systemic Thinking Human Attitude Single Reality
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Capra, F., 1982, “The Turning Point”, Simon & Shuster, New York.Google Scholar
- Flood, R.L., and Jackson, M.C., 1991, “Creative Problem Solving — Total Systems Intervention”, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
- Herrscher, E.G., 1988 (i), Cause-effect loops as explanation of underdevelopment, Human Systems Mgmt. 7:88.Google Scholar
- Herrscher, E.G., and others, 1992, Hyperinflation, culture and morphogenetic economics in Argentina, Chapter 2 in: “Context and Complexity — Cultivating Contextual Understanding”, in: M. Maruyama (Ed), Springer, New York.Google Scholar
- Hesse, H., 1989, “Demian”, Suhrkamp, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Prigogine, I. and Stangers, I., 1984, “Order out of Chaos — Man’s New Dialogue with Nature”, Bantam, New York.Google Scholar
- Quinn, D., 1993, “Ishmael”, Bantam, New York.Google Scholar
- Simon, H.A., 1947, “Administrative Behaviour”.Google Scholar
- Van Gigch, J.P and Pipino, L.L., 1986, In search of a paradigm for the discipline of information systems, Future Computing Systems. 71: 97.Google Scholar
- Yates, D., 1985, “The Politics of Management”, Jossey — Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar