Operationalising TSI

The Critical Review Mode
  • Jennifer Wilby


Total Systems Intervention (TSI) (Flood and Jackson, 1991) is a meta-methodology which operates a range of problem solving methodologies. Flood (1995 (a), (b)) views problem solving as a process of intervention where practitioners can learn about and manage complex interacting issues. The majority of these issues are at the present focused within the organisational setting. However, the principles, practice, utility and ideology underlying TSI are equally applicable in wider problem settings. The overall aim of this work is to advance the operationalisation of TSI within this wider context. The aim of this paper is to discuss the structure of TSI’s critical review mode within TSI. The critical review mode is one of three modes of operation in the implementation of TSI explained below: the critical review mode, the problem solving mode, and the critical reflection mode.


Ideal Organisation Implementation Phase Core Issue System Methodology Human Freedom 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, T. F. H., and Starr, T. B., 1982, “Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity,” The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Flood, R. L., 1995(a), Total systems intervention (TSI): A reconstitution, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 46: (in press).Google Scholar
  3. Flood, R. L., 1995(b), “Solving Problem Solving,” John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  4. Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C., 1991, “Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention,” John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  5. Habermas, J., 1972, “Knowledge and Human Interests,” Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  6. Jackson, M. C., 1990, Beyond a system of systems methodologies, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 41:657–68.Google Scholar
  7. Jackson, M. C. and Keys, P., 1984, Towards a system of systems methodologies, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 35: 473–86.Google Scholar
  8. O’Neill, R. V., DeAngelis, D. L., Waide, J. B., and Allen, T. F. H., 1986, “An Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems,” Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  9. Salthe, S. N., 1985, “Evolving Hierarchical Systems: Their Structure and Representation,” Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Salthe, S. N., 1993, “Development and Evolution: Complexity and Change in Biology,” MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  11. Weiss, P., Buechner, H. K., Coleman, J. S., Forrester, J. W., Lorenz, K., McNeill, D., Ozbekhan, H., 1971, “Hierarchically Organized Systems in Theory and Practice,” Hafner Publishing Co., New York.Google Scholar
  12. Wilby, J., 1994, A critique of hierarchy theory, Syst. Pract. 7: 653–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Wilby
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Systems Studies, Department of Management Systems and SciencesUniversity of HullHullUK

Personalised recommendations