Policy Relevance and the Future of Criminology—The American Society of Criminology, 1990 Presidential Address

  • Joan Petersilia
Part of the The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice book series (PSIC)


This is the American Society of Criminology’s fiftieth year as a professional organization. In this signal year, I think it is appropriate to take stock of how far we have come and where we would like to go as an organization—and as a discipline.


Criminal Justice Criminal Justice System Policy Relevance White Collar Crime Academic Status 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences (1990). Guide to Graduate Programs in Criminology, 1989–1990. Highland Heights, Ky.: Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, William (1990). Speech. International Journal on Drug Policy, June 1990: 16.Google Scholar
  3. Binder, Arnold (1988). Criminology and interdisciplinarity. Issues in Integrative Studies 5:41–67.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, D.D. and J.A. Weiss (1977). Social science and social policy: Schools and race. In Carol Weiss (ed.), Using Social Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  5. Hawkins, Keith and Donald Harris (1988). Policy, research, and funding: Socio-legal studies in a changed political climate. Law and Policy 10: 167–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Laub, John (1983). Criminology in the Making: An Oral History. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Morris, Albert (1975). The American Society of Criminology: A history, 1941–1974. Criminology 13: 123–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Petersilia, Joan (1987). The Influence of Criminal Justice Research. R-3516-NIJ. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND.Google Scholar
  9. Petersilia, Joan and Susan Turner (1990). Intensive supervision for high-risk probationers: Findings from three California experiments. R-3936-NIJ/BJA, Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND.Google Scholar
  10. Rich, R.F. (1981). Social Science Information and Public Policy Making. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Tonry, Michael and James Q. Wilson (1990). Drugs and Crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Weiss, Carol and M.J. Buchuvalas (1980). Trust tests and utility tests: Decision-makers’ frames of reference for social science research. American Sociological Review 45: 302–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gottfredson, D. and Tonry, M. (1987). Prediction and Classification in Criminal Justice Decision Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan Petersilia

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations