Assessment and Prediction Methods in Crime and Delinquency

  • Don M. Gottfredson
Part of the The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice book series (PSIC)


Prediction, a traditional aim of science, is a requisite to any effective crime and delinquency prevention or control program. If we seek to control delinquent and criminal behavior, then first we will need to be able to predict it.


Prediction Method Criminal Behavior Prediction Problem Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Prediction Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Adkins, B. C., Construction and Analysis of Achievement Tests, Washington, D.C.: Superintendent of Documents, 1947.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adkins, B. C., “Selecting Public Employees,” Pub. Personnel Rev., 1956, 17, 259–267.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahman, J. S., “An Application of Fisher’s Discriminant Function in the Classification of Students,” J. Educ. Psychol., 1955, 46, 184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Argyle, M., “A New Approach to the Classification of Delinquents with Implications for Treatment,” in Enquiries Concerning Kinds of Treatment for Kinds of Delinquents, Monograph No. 2, Sacramento, California: Board of Corrections, July 1961, 15–26.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ballard, K. B. Jr., Bobinski, C. A., Grant, J. D., A Pilot Study of Factors in Retraining Which Change Delinquency Attitudes, Third Technical Report, Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Naval Retraining Command, Camp Elliott, San Diego, California, Jan. 1956.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ballard K. B. Jr., and Gottfredson, D. M. Predictive Attribute Analysis and Prediction of Parole Performance, Vacaville, California: Institute for the Study of Crime and Delinquency, Dec. 1963.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bechtoldt, H. P., “Selection,” in Stevens, S. S., Handbook of Experimental Psychology, New York: Wiley, 1951, pp. 1237–1266.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Black, B. J., and Glick S. J., Recidivism at the Hawthorne Cedar Knolls School: Predicted vs. Actual Outcome for Delinquent Boys, Hawthorne-Cedars, Research Monograph No. 2, New York: Jewish Board of Guardians 1952.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blum, R. N., “Predicting Criminal Behavior: An Annotated Bibliography,” J. of Corr. Psychol.,Monograph No. 1.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bower, The Education of Emotionally Handicapped Children, a report to the California Legislature prepared pursuant to Sec. 1, of Chap. 2385, Statutes of 1957, Sacramento, California: State Dept. of Education, March 1961.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brandon, G. E., and Potter, A. K., “An Application of the Linear Discriminant Function,” Rural Sociol., 1953, 18, 321–326.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bridgman, P. W., The Logic of Modern Physics, New York: Macmillan, 1932.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brogden, H. E., “On the Interpretation of the Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Predictive Efficiency,” J. of Educ. Psychol., 1946, 37, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brogden, H. E., “Variation in Test Validity with Variation in the Distribution of Item Difficulties, Number of Items, and Degree of their Intercorrelation,” Psychometrika, 1946, 11, 197–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burgess, E. W., in Bruce, Burgess and Harno, The Working of the Indeterminate Sentence Law and the Parole System in Illinois, Springfield: Illinois State Board of Parole, 1928, 205–249.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burgess, E. W., and Cottrell, L. S. Jr., Predicting Success or Failure in Marriage, New York: Prentice-Hall, 1939.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Burgess, E. W., and Wallin, T., Engagement and Marriage, Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1953.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Caldwell, N. G., “Preview of a New Type of Probation Study Made in Alabama,” Federal Probation, June, 1951.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carroll, J. B., “The Effect of Difficulty and Chance Success on Correlations between Items or between Tests,” Psychometrika, 1945, 10, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cassell, R. N., and Van Vorst, R., “Level of Aspiration as a Means for Discerning Between In Prison’ and ‘Out of Prison’ Groups of Individuals,” J. Soc. Psychol., 1954, 40, 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cattell, R. B, “Measurement vs. Intuition in Applied Psychology,” Charact. and Personal., 1937, 6, 114–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Craig, M. M., and Glick, S. J., “Ten Years Experience with the Glueck Social Prediction Table,” Crime and Delinquency, July 1963, 249–261.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Craig, M. M., and Glick, S. J., A Manual of Procedures for the Application of the Glueck Prediction Table, New York: New York City Youth Board, Office of the Mayor, 1964.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Crawford, A. B., and Burnham, B. S., Forecasting College Achievement, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1946.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cronbach, L. J., “Test Reliability: Its Meaning and Determination,” Psychometrika, 1947, 12, 1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cronbach, L. J., Essentials of Psychological Testing, 2nd Ed., New York: Harper, 1960.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cronbach, L J., and Gleser, G. C., Psychological Tests and Personnel Decisions, Urbana: University of Illinois 1957, 54, 494–497.Google Scholar
  28. 29.
    De Groot, A. D., Via Clinical to Statistical Prediction, invited address, Western Psychological Association, San Jose, April 1960.Google Scholar
  29. 30.
    Doctor, R. S., and Winder, C. L., “Delinquent vs. Non-Delinquent Performance on the Porteus Qualitative Maze Test,” J. Consult. Psychol., 1954, 18, 71–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 31.
    Duncan, O. D., Ohlin, L. E., Reiss, A. J., and Stanton H. R., “Formal Devices for Making Selection Decisions,” Amer. J. Sociol., 1953, 48, 573–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 32.
    Duncan, O. D., and Duncan, B., “A Methodological Analysis of Segregation Indexes,” Amer. Sociol. Rev., 1955, 20, 210–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 33.
    Ferguson, G. A., “On the Theory of Test Discrimination,” Psychometrika, 1949, 14, 6168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 34.
    Flanagan, J. C., “General Considerations in the Selections of Test Items and a Short Method of Estimating the Product Moment Coefficient from the Data at the Tails of the Distribution,” J. Educ. Psychol., 1939, 30, 674–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 35.
    Flanagan, J. C., “The Aviation Psychology Program in the Army Air Forces,” Army Aviation Psychology Research Program Report 1, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1948.Google Scholar
  35. 36.
    Gillin, J. L., “Predicting Outcome of Adult Probationers in Wisconsin,” Amer. Sociol. Rev., 1950, 15, 550–553.Google Scholar
  36. 37.
    Glaser, D., The Effectiveness of a Prison and Parole System, New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1964, Chapter 3.Google Scholar
  37. 38.
    Glueck, S., and Glueck, E. T., 500 Criminal Careers, New York: Knopf, 1930.Google Scholar
  38. 39.
    Glueck, S., and Glueck, E. T., Five Hundred Delinquent Women, New York: Knopf, 1934.Google Scholar
  39. 40.
    Glueck, S., and Glueck, E. T., One Thousand Juvenile Delinquents, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
  40. 41.
    Glueck, S., and Glueck, E. T., Juvenile Delinquents Grown Up, New York: Commonwealth Fund, 1940.Google Scholar
  41. 42.
    Glueck, S., and Glueck, E. T., Criminal Careers in Retrospect, New York: The Commonwealth Fund, 1943.Google Scholar
  42. 43.
    Glueck„ S., and Glueck, E. T., Unravelling Juvenile Delinquency, New York: The Commonwealth Fund, 1950.Google Scholar
  43. 44.
    Glueck, S., “Pre-Sentence Examination of Offenders to Aid In Choosing a Method of Treatment,” J. Crim. Law Criminol., 1951, 41, 717–731.Google Scholar
  44. 45.
    Glueck, S., and Glueck, E. T., Later Criminal Careers, New York: The Commonwealth Fund, 1957.Google Scholar
  45. 46.
    Glueck, S., and Glueck, E. T., Predicting Delinquency and Crime, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
  46. 47.
    Glueck, E. T., “Efforts to Identify Delinquents,” Federal Probation, 24, June, 1960, 49–56.Google Scholar
  47. 48.
    Glueck, E. T., “Toward Improving the Identification of Delinquents,” J. Crini. Law Criminol., 1962, 53, 164–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 49.
    Gottfredson, D. M., A Shorthand Formula for Base Expectancies, Sacramento, California: California Department of Corrections, December, 1962.Google Scholar
  49. 50.
    Gottfredson, D. M., “The Practical Application of Research,” Canadian J. Corr., 5, 4, October, 1963, 212–228.Google Scholar
  50. 51.
    Gottfredson, D. M., and Bonds, J. A., A Manual for Intake Base Expectancy Scoring (Form CDC BE61A), Sacramento, California: California Department of Corrections, April, 1961.Google Scholar
  51. 52.
    Gottfredson, D. M., Ballard, K. B., Jr., and Bonds, J. A., Base Expectancy: California Institution for Women, Sacramento, California: Institute for the Study of Crime and Delinquency and California Department of Corrections, September, 1962.Google Scholar
  52. 53.
    Gottfredson, D. M., Ballard, K. B., Jr., and Lane, L., Association Analysis in a Prison Sample and Prediction of Parole Performance, Vacaville, California: Institute for the Study of Crime and Delinquency, November, 1963.Google Scholar
  53. 54.
    Gottfredson, D. M., Ballard, K. B., Jr., Mannering, J. W., and Babst, D. V., Wisconsin Base Expectancies for Reformatories and Prisons, Vacaville, California: Institute for the Study of Crime and Delinquency, June, 1965.Google Scholar
  54. 55.
    Gottfredson, D. M., and Ballard, K. B., Jr., Association Analysis, Predictive Attribute Analysis, and Parole Behavior, paper presented at the Western Psychological Association meetings, Portland, Oregon, April, 1964.Google Scholar
  55. 56.
    Gottfredson, D. M., and Ballard, K. B., Jr., The Validity of Two Parole Prediction Scales: An 8 Year Follow Up Study, Vacaville, California, 1965.Google Scholar
  56. 57.
    Gottfredson, D. M., and Ballard, K. B., Jr., Testing Prison and Parole Decisions, unpublished manuscript, July, 1966.Google Scholar
  57. 58.
    Gough, H. G., “A Sociological Theory of Psychopathy,” Amer. Sociol. Rev., 1948, 53, 359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 59.
    Gough, H. G., “What Determines the Academic Achievement of High School Students?,” J. Educ. Res., 1953, 321–331.Google Scholar
  59. 60.
    Gough, H. G., Systematic Validation of a Test for Delinquency, paper presented at the American Psychological Association meeting, New York, New York, September, 1954.Google Scholar
  60. 61.
    Gough, H. G., “Theory and Measurement of Socialization,” J. Consult. Psychol., 1960, 24, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 62.
    Gough, H. G., “Clinical vs. Statistical Prediction in Psychology.” Chapter 9, in Postman, L., Ed., Psychology in the Making, New York: Knopf 1962, 526–584.Google Scholar
  62. 63.
    Gough, H. G., and Peterson, D. R., “The Identification and Measurement of Predispositional Factors in Crime and Delinquency,” J. of Consult. Psychol. 1952, 26, 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 64.
    Gough, H. G., Wenk, E. A., and Rosynko, V. V., “Parole Outcome As Predicted from the CPI, the MMPI, and a Base Expectancy Table,” J. Abnorm. Psych., 70, 6, December, 1965.Google Scholar
  64. 65.
    Grant, J. D., The Navy’s Attack on the Problems of Delinquency, Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Naval Retraining Command, Camp Elliott, San Diego, California, (Mimeo) April 6, 1955.Google Scholar
  65. 66.
    Grant, J. D., Bobinski, C. A., and Ballard, K. B., Jr., Factors in Retraining which Affect Delinquency Proneness, Fifth Technical Report, Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Naval Retraining Command, Camp Elliott, San Diego, California, January, 1956.Google Scholar
  66. 67.
    Grygier, T., Treatment Variables in Non-linear Prediction paper presented to the Joint Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Montreal, December, 1964.Google Scholar
  67. 68.
    Guilford, J. P., Personality,New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  68. 69.
    Gulliksen, H., “The Relation of Item Difficulty and Inter-Item Correlation to Test Variance and Reliability,” Psychometrika, 1945, 10, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 70.
    Gunderson, E. K., Grant, J. D., and Ballard, K. B., Jr., The Prediction of Military Delinquency, San Diego California: U.S. Naval Retraining Command, (Mimeo.)Google Scholar
  70. 71.
    Gunderson, E. K., and Ballard, K. B., Jr., Discriminant Analysis of Variables Related to Nonconformity in Naval Recruits, Eleventh Technical Report, Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Naval Retraining Command, Camp Elliott San Diego, California, ( Mimeo. ), August, 1959.Google Scholar
  71. 72.
    Guttman, Louis, “Mathematical and Tabulation Techniques. Supplemental Study B,” in Horst, P., The Prediction of Personal Adjustment, New York: Social Science Research Council, 1941, 253–364.Google Scholar
  72. 73.
    Guttman, L., “A Basis for Analyzing Test-Retest Reliability,” Psychometrika, 1945, 10, 255–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 74.
    Guttman, L. “Test-Retest Reliability of Qualitative Data,” Psychometrika, 1946, 9, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 75.
    Hall C. L., Aptitude Testing, New York: World, 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 76.
    Hanley, C., “The Gauging of Criminal Predispositions,” in Toch, H., Legal and Criminal Psychology, New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston, 1961, 213–242.Google Scholar
  76. 77.
    Hathaway, S. R., and McKinley, J. C., The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Manual. ( Revised) New York: Psychological Corp., 1951.Google Scholar
  77. 78.
    Hathaway, S. R., and Monachesi, E. D., Analyzing and Predicting Juvenile Delinquency with the MMPI, New York: The Psychological Corp., 1954.Google Scholar
  78. 79.
    Hathaway, S. R., and Monachesi, E. D., “The Personalities of Pre-Delinquent Boys,” J. Crini. Law Criminol., 1957, 48, 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 80.
    Horst, P., The Prediction of Personal Adjustment, New York: Social Science Research Council Bulletin No. 48, 1941.Google Scholar
  80. 81.
    Horst, P., “Mathematical Contributions. Supplemental Study E,” The Prediction of Personal Adjustment, Social Science Research Council, New York: 1941, 407–47.Google Scholar
  81. 82.
    Horst, P., “A Generalized Expression for the Reliability of Measures,” Psychometrika, 1949, 14, 21–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 83.
    Hunt, H. F., “Clinical Methods: Psychodiagnostics,” in Stone, C. B., and Taylor, V. W., Eds., Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 1, Stanford: Annual Reviews, Inc., 1950, 207–220.Google Scholar
  83. 84.
    Hunt, W. A., “An Actuarial Approach to Clinical Judgment,” in Bass, B. N., and Berg, I. A. Objective Approaches to Personality Study, Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1959, 169–191.Google Scholar
  84. 85.
    Ives, V., Grant, M. Q., and Ballard, K. B., Jr., Interpersonal Variables Related to Recidivism in Military Delinquency, Eighth Technical Report, Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Naval Retraining Command, Camp Elliott, San Diego California, ( Mimeo.) December, 1957.Google Scholar
  85. 86.
    Jacobson, J. L., and Wirt, R. D., Studies in Psychological and Sociological Variables in State Prison Inmates, Section No. 1, 18 Variable Profile, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, December, 1961.Google Scholar
  86. 87.
    James, W., “Pragmatism. A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking,” 1907, reprinted as “Pragmatism’s Conception of Truth,” in Essays in Pragmatism, New York, Hafner, 1955.Google Scholar
  87. 88.
    Jarrett, R. F., “Percent Increase in Output of Selected Personnel as an Index to Test Efficiency,” J. Appl. Psychol., 1948, 32, 135–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 89.
    Jones, D. S., Livson, N. H., and Sarbin, T., “Perceptual Completion Behavior in Juvenile Delinquents,” Percept. Mot. Skills, 1955, 5, 141–146.Google Scholar
  89. Kirby, B. C., “Parole Prediction Using Multiple Correlation,” Amer. J. Sociol.,1953–4, 59, 539–550.Google Scholar
  90. 91.
    Kvaraceus, W. C., “Forecasting Juvenile Delinquency: A Three Year Experiment,” Exceptional Children, XVIII, April 1961, 429–435.Google Scholar
  91. 92.
    Kvaraceus, W. C., “Programs of Early Identification and Prevention of Delinquency,” Social Deviancy Among Youth, 65th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1966, 189–220.Google Scholar
  92. 93.
    Lackuran, R., The Predictive Use of the Linear Discriminant Function in Naval Aviation Cadet Selection, U.S. Naval Sch. Aviat. Med. Res. Rep. 1953, Rep. II N.M. 001057. 16. 02–11 p.Google Scholar
  93. 94.
    Lunden W. A., “Forecast for 1955: Predicting Prison Population,” The Presidio, 1952, 19, No. 2.Google Scholar
  94. 95.
    MacNaughton-Smith, P., “The Classification of Individuals by the Possession of Attributes Associated with a Criterion,” Biometrics, June, 1963.Google Scholar
  95. 96.
    McArthur, C., “Analyzing the Clinical Process,” J. Counsel. Psychol., 1954, 1, 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 97.
    Mannering, J. W., and Babst, D. V., Wisconsin Base Expectancies for Adult Male Parolees, Progress Report No. 4, Wisconsin State Department of Public Welfare Bureau of Research and Division of Corrections, April, 1963.Google Scholar
  97. 98.
    Mannheim, H., and Wilkins, L. T., Prediction Methods in Relation to Borstal Training, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1955.Google Scholar
  98. 99.
    May, M. A., “Predicting Academic Success,” J. Educ. Psychol., 1923, 14, 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 100.
    Meehl, P. E., Clinical vs. Statistical Prediction, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1954.Google Scholar
  100. 101.
    Meehl, P. E., “Clinical vs. Actuarial Prediction,” in Proceedings, 1955 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems, Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1956, 136–141.Google Scholar
  101. 102.
    Meehl, P. E., “When Should We Use Our Heads Instead of the Formula?” J, Counsel. Psychol., 1957, 4, 268–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 103.
    Meehl, P. E., “A Comparison of Conditions with Five Statistical Methods of Identifying MMPI Profiles,” J. Counsel. Psychol., 1959, 6, 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 104.
    Meehl, P. E., and Rosen, A., “Antecedent Probability and the Efficiency of Psychometric Signs, Patterns, or Cutting Scores,” Psychol. Bull., 1955, 52, 194–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Meehl, P. E., “The Tie That Binds,” J. Counsel. Psychol. 1956, 3, 163–164, 171, 173.Google Scholar
  105. 106.
    Monachesi, E. D., Prediction Factors in Probation, Hanover, N. H.: The Sociological Press, 1932.Google Scholar
  106. 107.
    Monachesi, E. D., “Personality Characteristics and Socio-Economic Status of Delinquents and Non-Delinquents,” J. Crim. Law Crirninol., 1950, 40, 570–583.Google Scholar
  107. 108.
    Ohlin, L. E., and Duncan, O. D., “The Efficiency of Prediction in Criminology,” Amer. J. Social., 1949, 54, 441–51.Google Scholar
  108. 109.
    Ohlin, L. E., Selection for Parole: A Manual of Parole Prediction, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1951.Google Scholar
  109. 110.
    Ohlin, L. E., Some Parole Prediction Problems in the United States, paper presented at the Third International Congress of Criminology, London, September, 1955.Google Scholar
  110. 111.
    Paton, J. H., “Predicting Prison Adjustment with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory,” J. Clin. Psychol., 1958, 14, 308–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 112.
    Porteus, S. D., Qualitative Performance in the Maze Test, The Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
  112. 113.
    Powers, E., and Witmer, H., An Experiment in the Prevention of Delinquency: The Cambridge-Summerville Youth Study, New York: Columbia University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
  113. 114.
    Quay, H., and Peterson, D. R., “A Brief Scale for Juvenile Delinquency,” J. Clin. Psychol., 14, April, 1958, 139–142.Google Scholar
  114. 115.
    Reed, R. R., “An Empirical Study in the Reduction of the Number of Variables Used in Prediction. Supplementary Study C” in Horst, P., The Prediction of Social Adjustment, New York: Social Science Research Council, 1941.Google Scholar
  115. 116.
    Reichenbach, M., Experience and Prediction, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938.Google Scholar
  116. 117.
    Reiss, A. J., Jr., “The Accuracy, Efficiency, and Validity of a Prediction Instrument,” unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Dept. of Sociology, University of Chicago, 1949.Google Scholar
  117. 118.
    Reiss, A. J., Jr., “Delinquency as a Failure of Personal and Social Control,” Amer. Sociol. Rev., 1951, 16, 196–207.Google Scholar
  118. 119.
    Reiss, A. J., Jr., “Unravelling Juvenile Delinquency: II. An Appraisal of the Research Methods,” Amer. J. Sociol. 1951, 57, 115–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 120.
    Richardson, M. W., “The Combination of Measures. Supplemental Study D,” in Horst, P., The Prediction of Personal Adjustment, New York: Social Science Research Council, 1941, 379–401.Google Scholar
  120. 121.
    Rubin, S., “Unravelling Juvenile Delinquency: I. Illusions in a Research Project Using Matched Pairs,” Amer. J. Sociol., 1951, 57, 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 122.
    Saline T., “Recidivism and Maturation,” National Probation and Parole Association Journal, 4, 3, July, 1958, 241–250.Google Scholar
  122. 123.
    Sarbin, T. R., “The Logic of Prediction in Psychology,” Psycho!. Rev., 1944, 51, 210–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 124.
    Savitz, L. D., “Prediction Studies in Criminology,” International Bibliography on Crime and Delinquency, New York: National Council on Crime and Delinquency, 1965.Google Scholar
  124. 125.
    Schactel, E. G., “Notes on the Use of the Rorschach Test” in Glueck, S., and Glueck, E. T., Unravelling Juvenile Delinquency, New York: Commonwealth Fund, 1950.Google Scholar
  125. 126.
    Schiedt, R., Ein Beitrag Zum Problem der Ruckfallsprognose, Munchen, 1936.Google Scholar
  126. 127.
    Schuessler, K. F., and Cressey, D. R., “Personality Characteristics of Criminals,” Amer. J. Sociol., 1950, 55, 483–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 128.
    Sellin, T., and Wolfgang, M. E., The Measurement of Delinquency, New York: Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
  128. 129.
    Shaplin, J. T., and Tiedman, D. V., “Comment on the Juvenile Prediction Tables in the Glueck’s Unravelling Juvenile Delinquency, ” Amer. Sociol. Rev., 1951, 16, 544–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 130.
    Stevens, S. S., “Mathematics, Measurement, and Psychophysics,” in Stevens, S. S., Handbook of Experimental Psychology, New York: John Wiley and Sons 1957, 1–49.Google Scholar
  130. 131.
    Stogtill, M., Behavior Cards: A Test-Interview for Delinquent Children,The Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
  131. 132.
    Stott, D. H., “A New Delinquency Prediction Instrument Using Behavioral Indications,” International Journal of Social Psychiatry, VI, 1960, 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 133.
    Strong, E. K., Jr., Vocational Interests of Men and Women Stanford University Press, 1943.Google Scholar
  133. 134.
    Strong, E. K., Jr., Vocational Interests Eighteen Years After College, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1955.Google Scholar
  134. 135.
    Taylor, D. W., “An Analysis of Delinquency Based on Case Studies,” J. Abnorm. Soc. Psycho!., 42, January, 1947.Google Scholar
  135. Thorndike, E. L., et al., Prediction of Vocational Success,New York: Commonwealth Fund, 1934.Google Scholar
  136. 137.
    Thorndike E. L. Personne! Selection, New York: Wiley 1949.Google Scholar
  137. 138.
    Tibbitts, C., “Success and Failure on Parole Can be Predicted,” Crim. Law Criminol., 1931, 22, 11–50.Google Scholar
  138. 139.
    Tibbitts, C., “The Reliability of Factors Used in Predicting Success or Failure on Parole,” J. Law Criminal. 1932, 22, 844–853.Google Scholar
  139. 140.
    Toby, J., “An Evaluation of Early Identification and Intensive Treatment Programs for Pre-Delinquents,” Social Problems, 13, 2, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 141.
    Toops, H. A., “Philosophy and Practice of Personnel Selection,” Educ. Psycho!. Measmt., 1945, 5, 95–124.Google Scholar
  141. 142.
    Trunk, H., Sociale Prognosen Strafgefangenen, 28 Monatsschift fur Kriminolobiologie und Strafrechtsreform, 1937.Google Scholar
  142. 143.
    Verrone, P. E., “The Assessment of Children: Recent Studies in Mental Measurement and Statistical Analysis,” Studies in Education No. 7, London: University of London Institute of Education and Evans Bros. Ltd. 1955, 189–215.Google Scholar
  143. 144.
    Vold, G. B., “Prediction Methods Applied to Problems of Classification within Institutions,” J. Crim. Law and Criminol., 1936, 26, 202–209.Google Scholar
  144. 145.
    Walters, A. A., “A Note on Statistical Methods of Predicting Delinquency,” Brit. J. Delinquency, 1956, 6, 297–302.Google Scholar
  145. 146.
    Ward, J. H., Jr., An Application of Linear and Curvilinear Joint Functional Regression in Psychological Prediction, U.S.A.F. Pers. Train. Res. Cent., Res. Bul., 1954, No. AFPTRCTR54 86, W29 p.Google Scholar
  146. 147.
    Warner, S. B., “Factors Determining Parole from the Massachusetts Reformatory,” J. Crim. Law Criminol., 1923 14, 172–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 148.
    Washbume, J. W., The Washburne Social Adjustment Inventory, Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  148. 149.
    Wilkins, L. T., Classification and Contamination, a memorandum from the Research Unit, Home Office, London December, 1955.Google Scholar
  149. 150.
    Wilkins, L. T., Delinquent Generations: A Home Office Research Unit Report, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1960.Google Scholar
  150. 151.
    Wilkins, L. T., “Who Does What with What and to Whom?” Sacramento, California, Department of Corrections, The Research Newsletter, 1 March, 1959.Google Scholar
  151. 152.
    Wilkins, L. T., “What Is Prediction and Is It Necessary in Evaluating Treatment?” in Research and Potential Application of Research in Probation, Parole, and Delinquency Prediction, New York: Citizens Committee for Children of New York, Research Center, New York School of Social Work, Columbia University, July, 1961.Google Scholar
  152. 153.
    Wilkins, L. T., and MacNaughton-Smith, P., “New Prediction and Classification Methods in Criminology,” The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1954, 1, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. 154.
    Williams, W. T., and Lambert, J. M., “Multivariate Methods in Plant Ecology: Parts I, II, and III,” J. Ecol., 1959, 47, 83–101; 1960, 48, 680–710; 1961, 49, 717–729.Google Scholar
  154. 155.
    Wooton, B., Social Science and Social Pathology, New York: Macmillan, 1959, Chapter 5.Google Scholar
  155. 156.
    Zakilski, F. C., “Studies in Delinquency: II. Personality Structure of Delinquent Boys,” Genet. Psychol., 1949, 74, 109–117.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Don M. Gottfredson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations