The Just Deserts vs. the Medical Model
Part of the The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice book series (PSIC)
Just deserts refers to retribution, punishment that is deserved for the seriousness of the crime. The medical model refers to rehabilitation, treatment based on the attributes of the offender.
KeywordsCriminal Justice Death Penalty Criminal Justice System Medical Model Corporal Punishment
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.James B. Pritchard: Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament. 2nd ed., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1955, pp. 163–180.Google Scholar
- 2.Walter Kaufman: Without Guilt and Justice. New York, NY: Dell Publishing Company 1975, especially Chapter 2.Google Scholar
- 3.I am grateful to Edna Erez for bringing this use of the Hebrew alphabet and the interpretation by the Gaon Mevilna (the genius of Vilna) to my attention.Google Scholar
- 4.Plato: Laws,Book IX, from The Dialogues of Plato (translated by Benjamin Jowett). In: Hutchins, R.M. (ed.): Great Books of the Western World, 7, Plato. Chicago, Illinois: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1952, p. 744 (emphasis added).Google Scholar
- 5.Plato (n. 4), p. 782.Google Scholar
- 6.See Padover, S.K. (ed.): The Complete Jefferson; Containing His Major Writings, Published and Unpublished, Except His Letters. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce 1943, pp. 90–102, cited by Kaufman, W.: Retribution and the Ethics of Punishment. In: BarnettGoogle Scholar
- 7.R.E./Hagel, J. (eds.): Assessing the Criminal: Restitution, Retribution, and the Legal Process. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger 1977, p. 223.Google Scholar
- 9.Charles Dickens: American Notes for General Circulation. London: Chapman and Hall 1842, pp. 119–120; cited by Eriksson, T.: The Reformers: An Historical Survey of Pioneer Experiments in the Treatment of Criminals. New York: Elsevier 1976, p. 70.Google Scholar
- 10.Lewis, C.S.: The Humanitarian Theory of Punishment. Res Juridicae 6 (1953), pp. 224–230. Reprinted in Sellars, W./Hospers, J.: Readings in Ethical Theory. New York: Prentice-Hall 1970.Google Scholar
- 11.Bailey, W.C.: Correctional Outcome: An Evaluation of 100 Reports. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science 57 (1966), pp. 153–160; Hood, R.G.: Research on the Effectiveness of Punishments and Treatments. In: Collected Studies in Criminological Research, vol. 1. Strasbourg: Council of Europe 1967, pp. 74–102; Ward, D.A.: Evaluation of Correctional Treatment: Some Implications of Negative Findings. In: Yefsky, S.A. (ed.): Law Enforcement, Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: Thompson 1967, pp. 201–208.Google Scholar
- 12.Lipton, D./Martinson R./Wilks, J.: The Effectiveness of Correctional Treatment: A Survey of Treatment Evaluation Studies. New York: Praeger 1975.Google Scholar
- 13.Martinson, R.: What Works?—Questions and Answers about Prison Reform. Journal of Public Interest 6 (June 1974), pp. 22–54.Google Scholar
- 14.Struggle for Justice. A Report on Crime and Punishment in America. Prepared for the American Friends Service Committee. New York: Hill and Wang 1971.Google Scholar
- 16.Packer, H.L.: The Limits of Criminal Sanction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press 1968. 17von Hirsch, A.: Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments. New York: Hill and Wang 1976.Google Scholar
- 18.See Wilson, J.Q.: Thinking about Crime. New York: Basic Books 1975.Google Scholar
- 19.Rothman, D.: The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic. Boston: Little, Brown 1971.Google Scholar
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995