Prime Length Symmetric FFTS and Their Computer Implementations

  • Jaime Seguel
  • Ricardo Santander
  • Fredi Palominos
  • Claudio Fuentealba


Since its rediscovery in 1965 by Cooley and Tukey1, the fast Fourier transform (FFT) has become one of the most widely used computational tools in science and engineering. The term FFT, initially associated to the Cooley-Tukey FFT for sequences of period N = 2 k , has become after the efforts of many researchers over the years, the generic name of a whole family of efficient DFT numerical methods. Each member in the FFT family is specialized in computing the DFT of a particular class of periodic sequences. This period is also referred as the transform’s length and the DFT (FFT) of length N is usually called N-point DFT (FFT). The first member in this family is actually an extension of Cooley and Tukey’s idea to N-point DFTs where N is factorizable. These N-point FFTs compute the N-point DFT through nested sequences of DFTs whose lengths are the factors of N. The Good-Thomas algorithm2 improves over the extended Cooley-Tukey FFT for highly composite transform’s length. Rader’s algorithm3, on its turn, is designed for computing prime length DFTs. These algorithms, all members of the family of traditional FFTs, reduce the N-point DFT arithmetic complexity from O(N 2 ) to O(N log N).


Fast Fourier Transform Discrete Fourier Transform Fast Fourier Transform Algorithm Prime Length Core Procedure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cooley J. and Tukey J. “An algorithm for the Machine Calculation of the Complex Fourier Series”, IEEE Trans. Comt. AC-28 (1965), pp 819–830.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Good I. “The Interaction Algorithm and Practical Fourier Analysis”, J. Royal Stat. Soc. Ser. B 20 (1958), pp 361–375.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rader C. “Discrete Fourier Transforms when the Number of Data Points is Prime”, Proc. IEEE 56 (1968), pp 1107–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooley J., Lewis P. and Welch P. “The Fast Fourier Transform Algorithm: Programming considerations in the Calculation of sine, Cosine and Laplace transforms”, J. Sound Vib. 12 (1970), pp 315–337.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dollimore J. “Some Algorithms for use with the Fast Fourier Transform”, J. Inst. Math. Appl. v. 12 (1973), pp 115–117.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Swarztrauber P. “Symmetric FFTs”, Math. Comp. 47 (1986), pp 323–346.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Briggs W. “Further Symmetries of In-place FFTs”, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comp. 8 (1987), pp 644–654.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Loan, C. “Computational Frameworks for the Fast Fourier Transform”, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1992.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Otto J. “Symmetric Prime Factor Fast Fourier Transform Algorithm”, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 10(3) (1989), 419–431.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaime Seguel
    • 1
  • Ricardo Santander
    • 2
  • Fredi Palominos
    • 2
  • Claudio Fuentealba
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of Puerto Rico at MayaguezPuerto Rico
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversidad de Santiago de ChileChile

Personalised recommendations