Intensity Coding in an Olfactory Sensory Neuron
Coding properties at steady-state of the receptor potential were analyzed in a biophysical model of an olfactory neuron with and without taking into account the auxiliary cells that surround it. It was found that the neuron model without auxiliary cells has generally a higher sensitivity and a narrower dynamic range. The dynamic range is wide when the input resistance of passive dendrite, soma and axon is small and the sensory dendrite is unbranched, whereas the sensitivity is high in the opposite conditions. Both coding properties are large for a long enough dendrite.
KeywordsReceptor Potential Input Resistance Neuron Structure Axon Initial Segment Odour Intensity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Kaissling. K.-E. (1971) In Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. IV, Chemical Senses, part I, Olfaction, L.M. Beidler (ed.) ( Springer-Verlag, Berlin ) pp. 351–431.Google Scholar
- 2.Kaissling, K.-E. (1987) 1211. Wright Lectures on Insect Olfaction. K. Colbow (ed.) ( Simon Fraser University, Burnaby).Google Scholar
- 3.Kaissling, K.-E. and Thorson, J. (1980) Insect olfactory sensilla: structural, chemical and electrical aspects of the functional organization. In Receptors for Neurotransmitters, Hormones and Pheromones in Insects. D.B. Satelle, L.M. Hall and J.G. Hildebrand (eds.) (Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam ) pp. 261–282.Google Scholar
- 4.Rospars, J.-P., Lânskÿ, P., Tuckwell, H.C. and Venneulen, A. (1996) Coding of odor intensity in a steady-state deterministic model of an olfactory receptor neuron. J. Comput. Neurosci. 3, 51–72.Google Scholar
- 5.Thurm, U. and Köppers, J. (1980) Epithelial physiology of insect sensilla. In Insect Biology in the Future. M. Locke and D. Smith (eds.) ( Academic Press, New York ) pp. 735–764.Google Scholar
- 7.Vermeulen, A., Rospars, J.-P, Lânskÿ, P. and Tuckwell, H.C. (1996) Coding of stimulus intensity in an olfactory receptor neuron: role of neuron spatial extension and dendritic backpropagation of action potentials. Bul. Math. Biol. 58, 493–512.Google Scholar