A Continuous Time Model of Synaptic Plasticity in the Cerebellar Cortex

  • Garrett T. Kenyon

Abstract

Patients with cerebellar damage exhibit a variety of motor deficits1, and both human and animal studies indicate that cerebellar lesions disrupt several forms of motor learning2. A number of competing hypotheses regarding the nature of cerebellar involvement in motor function have been proposed3–8. One particularly influential class of models, based on the original proposals of Marr9, and shortly thereafter amended by Albus10, asserts that motor memories are stored in the cerebellar cortex at synapses from parallel fibers onto Purkinje cells (pf*Pkj). This class of models can be characterized by the following four hypotheses. I) Climbing fiber inputs to the cerebellum, which originate from the inferior olive, are topographically organized by motor function. Each climbing fiber conveys a precise motor instruction to a group of target Purkinje cells, which in turn project to cells in the cerebellar nuclei capable of generating the instructed movement via projections to brain stem motor nuclei. 2) Mossy fiber inputs to the cerebellum, which originate from the pontine and other brain stem nuclei, are activated by virtually every sensory modality, as well as by direct inputs from the cerebral cortex. Granule cells, whose axons give rise to parallel fibers, receive a highly divergent input from mossy fiber afferents. The precise pattern of parallel fibers active at any given moment provides a sparse distributed representation of the mossy fiber input. 3) For any given Purkinje cell, each climbing fiber input induces a cell wide signal that causes the weights of any coactive pf*Pkj synapses to be depressed. 4) By repeatedly pairing a particular movement context with the appropriate pattern of climbing fiber activity, the occurrence of that context alone becomes sufficient to initiate the instructed movement. In particular, the occurrence of a previously paired movement context leads to a reduction of Purkinje cell firing, thereby initiating the instructed movement by releasing the appropriate target neurons in the cerebellar nuclei from tonic Purkinje cell inhibition. In order to account for the reversibility of learned motor behavior, the above model is typically augmented by an additional hypothesis: 5) When pf*Pkj synapses are active in the absence of a climbing fiber input, their synaptic weights are potentiated11,12. Thus, repeated presentations of a previously established movement context in the absence of activity in those climbing fibers which instruct for that movement will eventually eliminate the motor response associated with that context.

Keywords

Purkinje Cell Cerebellar Cortex Synaptic Weight Cerebellar Nucleus Parallel Fiber 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Gilman, J.R. Bloedel, and R. Lechtenberg, 1981, Disorders of the Cerebellum. first ed. Contemporary Neurology Series, (F. Plum ed.), Volume 21, F. A. Davis Company, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Ito, 1984. The cerebellum and neural control, Raven Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.C. Houk and S.P. Wise. 1995, Distributed modular architectures linking basal ganglia. cerebellum. and cerebral cortex: Their Role in planning and controlling action, Cerebral Cortex 2: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.-H. Gao, L.M. Parsons, J.M. Bower, J. Xiong. J. Li. and P.T. Fox, 1996, Cerebellum implicated in sensory acquisition and discrimination rather than motor control., Science 272: 545–47.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.R. Bloedel, 1992. Functional heterogeneity with structural homogeneity: How does the cerebellum operate?, Behan. Brain Sci. 15: 666–678.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Ito, 1982, Cerebellar control of the vestibulo-ocular reflex–around the flocculus hypothesis.,.4nn. Rev., Veurosci. 12: 85–102.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Llinas and J.P. Welsh, 1993, On the cerebellum and motor learning., Cur Opin. Neurobiol. 3: 958–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Pcllionisz and R. Llinas, 1980, Tensorial approach to the geometry of brain function: Cerebellar coordination via a metric tensor, Neuro.sci. 5: 1125–1136.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Marr, 1969. A theory of cerebellar cortex, J. Physiol. 202: 437–470.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.S. Albus, 1971. A theory of cerebellar function, Math. Biosci. 10: 25–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Fujita, 1982, Adaptive filter model of the cerebellum., Biol. Cvbern. 45: 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.J. Sejnowski. 1977, Storing covariance with nonlinearly interacting neurons, J. Math. Biol. 4: 303–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Ito and M. Kano, 1982, Long lasting depression of parallel fiber-Purkinje cell transmission induced by conjunctive stimulation of parallel fibers and climbing fibers in the cerebellar cortex. Neurosci. Let. 33: 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Sakurai, 1987, Synaptic modification of parallel fibre-Purkinje cell transmission in in vitro guinea-pig cerebellar slices,. 1. Phv.ciol. (Lond) 394: 463–480.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D.J. Linden and J.A. Connor, 1993, Cellular mechanisms of long-term depression in the cerebellum., Cu,: Opin. Neurohiol. 3 (3): 401–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Ito, 1989, Long term depression, Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 12: 85–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.C. Houk and A.R. Gibson, 1986, Sensorimotor processing through the cerebellum, in: New Concepts in Cerebellar Neurobiology, ( J.S. King and J. Courville, Eds), pp. 387–416, Liss: New York.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.P. Welsh and J.A. Harvey, 1989, Cerebellar lesions and the nictitating membrane reflex: performance deficits of the conditioned and unconditioned response., J. Neurosci. 9(11: 299–311.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    T.M. Kelly, C.-C. Zuo, and J.R. Bloedel, 1990. Classical conditioning of the cyeblink reflex in the decerebrate-decerebellate rabbit., Behay. Brain. Res. 38: 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gilbert and W.T. Thach, 1977, Purkinje cell activity during motor learning.. Brain Res. 128: 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D.A. McCormick and R.F. Thompson, 1984, Neuronal responses of the rabbit cerebellum during acquisition and performance of a classically conditioned nictitating membrane-eyelid response.. J. Neurosci. 4 (11): 2811–2822PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    N.E. Berthier and J.W. Moore, 1986, Cerebellar Purkinje cell activity related to the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response., Exp. Brain Res. 63: 341–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. Watanabe, 1984, Neuronal events correlated with long term adaptation of the horizontal vistibulo-ocular reflex in the primate flocculus, Brain Res. 297: 169–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    T.J. Ruigrok and J. Voogd, 1990, Cerebellar nucleo-olivary projections in the rat: an anterograde tracing study with Phaseolus vulgaris-Ieucoagglutinin (PHA-L)., J. Comp. Neurol. 298 (3): 315–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    C.F. Ekcrot and O. Oscarsson, 1981, Prolonged depolarization elicited in Purkinje cell dendrites by climbing fiber inputs in the cat, J. Phvsiol. 318: 207–21.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    G.T. Kenyon, R.D. Puff, and E.E. Fetz, 1992, A general diffusion model for analyzing the efficacy of synaptic input to threshold neurons, Biol. Cvbern. 67: 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Garrett T. Kenyon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neurobiology and AnatomyUniversity of Texas Medical SchoolHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations