Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computational Modeling

An Integrated Study of Hippocampal Function
  • Chantal E. Stern
  • Michael E. Hasselmo

Abstract

A hippocampal model is utilized to simulate activation in humans detected using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). During a picture encoding task, fMRI measurements demonstrate increased signal intensity changes in the hippocampal formation and parahippocampal gyrus during sequential presentation of novel pictures, as compared to activation levels during repeated presentation of a single picture. In the hippocampal model, sequential presentation of novel patterns activates separate populations of neurons in the dentate gyrus, region CA3 and region CA 1. In contrast, repeated presentation of a single pattern activates the same subpopulation of neurons. In a model of region CA3, repeated activation of the same subpopulation results in decreased activity due to activation of a calcium-dependent potassium current. These results suggest that the changes in fMRI signal intensity during the presentation of novel vs. repeating pictures may be related to neuronal adaptation mediated by calcium-dependent potassium currents in hippocampal neurons.

Keywords

Dentate Gyrus Hippocampal Formation Functional Magnetic Resonance Image Inhibitory Interneuron Parahippocampal Gyrus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barkai E, Hasselmo ME (1994) Modulation of the input/output function of rat piriform cortex pyramidal cells. J. Neurophysiol. 72: 644–658.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eichenbaum, H. and Buckingham, J. (1990) Studies on hippocampal processing: experiment, theory and model. In: Learning and computational neuroscience: foundations of adaptive networks, M. Gabriel and J. Moore, eds., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hasselmo ME (1995) Neuromodulation and cortical function. Behay. Brain Res. 67: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hasselmo ME, Barkai E. Horwitz G, Bergman RE (1993) Modulation of neuronal adaptation and cortical associative memory function. In: Computation and Neural Systems II ( Eeckman F, Bower JM. ed). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hasselmo ME, Schnell E (1994) Laminar selectivity of the cholinergic suppression of synaptic transmission in rat hippocampal region CAI: Computational modeling and brain slice physiology. J. Neurosci. 14: 3898–3914.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hasselmo ME, Schnell E, Barkai E (1995) Learning and recall at excitatory recurrent synapses and cholinergic modulation in hippocampal region CA3. J. Neurosci. 15: 5249–5262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hasselmo ME and Stern CE (1996) Linking LTP to network function: A simulation of episodic memory in the hippocampal formation. In: Baudry M and Davis. 1 (eds) Long-Term Potentiation, Vol. 3. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hasselmo ME, Wyble BP and Stern CE (1996) A model of human memory based on the cellular physiology of the hippocampal formation. In: Parks R and Levine D (eds.) Neural Networks for Neuropsychologists. MIT Press: Cambridge. MA.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Chesler DA, et al. (1992) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 89: 5675–5679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Levy WB (1989) A computational approach to hippocampal function. In: Computational models of learning in simple neural systems ( Hawkins RD, Bower GH, ed ), pp. 243–305.Google Scholar
  11. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. I 1. Marr D (1971) Simple memory: A theory for archicortex. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B B262: 23–81Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McNaughton BL (1991) Associative pattern completion in hippocampal circuits: New evidence and new questions. Brain Res. Rev. 16: 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McNaughton BL, Morris RUM (1987) Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a distributed memory system. Trends Neurosci. 10: 408–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ogawa S. Tank DW. Menon R.. et al. (1992) Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: Functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 5951–5955PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sohal V and Hasselmo ME (1997) A model of changes in inferotemporal activity during a delayed match to sample task. In: Bower JM (ed) Computational Neuroscience, Plenum Press: New York. in press.Google Scholar
  16. Stern CE, Corkin S. Guimaracs AR, Sugiura R, Carr CA, Baker JB, Jennings Pi. Gonzalez RG and Rosen BR (1994) A functional MRI study of long-term explicit memory in humans. Soc. Neurosei. Abstr. 20: 530.8.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stern CE. Corkin S. Gonzalez R. Guimaraes AR. Baker JR, Jennings Pi, Carr CA, Sugiura RM. Vedaniham V and Rosen BR (1996) The hippocampal formation participates in novel picture encoding: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 8660–8665.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chantal E. Stern
    • 1
  • Michael E. Hasselmo
    • 2
  1. 1.MGH-NMR CenterHarvard Medical SchoolCharlestownUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations