Perceptual Completion across the Fovea under Scotopic/Mesopic Viewing Conditions

  • Jennifer Linden


Perceptual completion has been shown to occur across the blind spot, across the blue-blind region of the fovea, and across blind fields created by retinal scotomas. The purpose of this study was to determine whether perceptual completion can also occur across the dark-adapted fovea. The central fovea, which contains only cones, is blinded at low light levels, when rod vision is still possible in the periphery. Does the visual system “fill in” features across the center of gaze at low light levels? To answer this question, three dark-adapted subjects were asked to report the presence or absence of a circular gap in a field, line, or checkerboard pattern viewed under high scotopic or low mesopic conditions. The gap in the field, line, or pattern appeared on half the trials, positioned either at the fovea or 4° in the periphery. All three subjects were significantly more likely to report “no gap” on foveal gap trials than on peripheral gap trials for field and line stimuli; results for the patterned stimuli were inconclusive. These results indicate that perceptual completion of both fields and lines occurs across the fovea under high scotopic/low mesopic viewing conditions. The completion of lines suggests mechanisms involving cortical circuitry.


Illusory Contour Checkerboard Pattern Pattern Completion Gray Field Perceptual Completion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Crawford M.L.J. (1977) Central vision of man and macaque: cone and rod sensitivity. Brain Research 119: 345–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Curcio C.A., Sloan K.R., Kalina R.E., and Hendrickson A.E. (1990) Human photoreceptor topography. J. Comp. Neurol. 292: 497–523.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Curcio C.A., Allen K.A., Sloan K.R., Lerea C.L., Hurley J.B., Klock LB., and Milam A.H. (1991) Distribution and morphology of human cone photoreceptors stained with anti-blue opsin. J Comp. Neural. 312: 610–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Jayle G.E., Ourgaud A.G., Baisinger L.F., and Holmes W.J. (1959) Night Vision. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, Publisher.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Ramachandran V.S. (1992) Blind spots. Scientific American 266 (5): 86–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Ramachandran V.S. (1993) Filling in gaps in perception: Part H. Scotomas and phantom limbs. Curr: Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2 (2): 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Stabell B. And Stabell U. (1993) Rod-cone interaction in form detection. Vision Research 33 (2): 195–20I.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Wässle H. And Boycott B.B. (1991) Functional architecture of the mammalian retina. Phvsiol. Reviews 71 (2): 447–480.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Williams D.R., macleod D.I.A., and Hayhoe M.M. (1981) Foveal tritanopia. Vision Research 21: 1341–1356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Linden
    • 1
  1. 1.Computation and Neural Systems ProgramPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations