Considerations in the Treatment of Articulation Disorders

  • Harris Winitz

Abstract

Currently there is no general consensus regarding the treatment of articulatory errors. Rather, a variety of technical procedures are available some of which are intuitively based, while others seem to rest on a firm theoretical foundation. The primary focus of this chapter is to explore treatment considerations. The discussion will be restricted to procedures of learning, omitting treatments specific to medically linked articulation errors. Additionally, the special role of auditory knowledge will be considered.

Keywords

Discrimination Training Hearing Research Auditory Discrimination Hearing Disorder Target Sound 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aungst, L. F., Frick, J. V. Auditory discrimination ability and consistency of articulation of /r/. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1964, 29, 76–85.Google Scholar
  2. Bankson, N. W., Byrne, M. C. The effect of a timed correct sound production task on carryover. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1972, 15, 160–168.Google Scholar
  3. Belasco, S. Aital cal aprene las lengas estrangièras. [Comprehension: The key to second language acquisition.] In H. Winitz (Ed.), The comprehension approach to foreign language instruction. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, in press.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N. On the nature of language. In S. R. Hamad, H. D. Steklis, J. Lancaster (Eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech, (Vol. 280). Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. Cole, R. A., Jakimik, J., Cooper, W. E. Perceptibility of phonetic features in fluent speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978, 64, 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Compton, A. J. Generative studies of children’s phonological disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1970, 35, 313–339.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, W. E., Sorensen, J. M., Paccia, J. M. Correlations of duration for nonadjacent segments in speech: Aspects of grammatical coding. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977, 61, 1046–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costello, J. Programmed instruction. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1977, 42, 3–28.Google Scholar
  10. Costello, J., Onstine, J. M The modification of multiple articulation errors based on distinctive feature theory. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1976, 41, 199–215.Google Scholar
  11. Daniloff, R. G., Moll, K. Coarticulation of lip rounding. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1968, 11, 707–721.Google Scholar
  12. Dubois, E. M., Bemthal, J. E. A comparison of three methods of obtaining articulatory responses. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1978, 43, 295–305.Google Scholar
  13. Edwards, M. L. Perception and production in child phonology: The testing of four hypotheses. Journal of Child Language,1974, /, 205–220.Google Scholar
  14. Eilers, R. E., Oller, D. K. The role of speech discrimination in developmental sound substitutions. Journal of Child Language, 1976, 3, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eimas, P. D. Linguistic processing of speech of young infants. Language perspectives—acquisition, retardation, and intervention. In R. Schiefelbusch L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Baltimore: University Park Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  16. Faircloth, M. A., Faircloth, S. R. An analysis of the articulatory behavior of a speech-defective child in connected speech and in isolated-word responses. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1970, 35, 51–61.Google Scholar
  17. Fujimura, O. Personal communication. 1977.Google Scholar
  18. Games, S., Bond, Z. S. Slips of the ear: Errors in perception of casual speech. Proceedings of the 11th Regular Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1975, 214–225.Google Scholar
  19. Games, S., Bond, Z. S. The relationship between semantic expectation and acoustic information. In W. U. Dressler O. E. Pfeiffer (Eds.),Phonologica 1976, Innsbruck, Austria, Thomas Herock, 1977.Google Scholar
  20. Goldstein, J. I., Locke, J. L. Children ‘s identification and discrimination of phonemes. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 1971, 6, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guess, D. A functional analysis of receptive language and productive speech: Acquisition of the plural morpheme. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 1969, 2, 55–64.Google Scholar
  22. Haas, W. Phonological analysis of a case of dyslalia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1963, 28, 239–246.Google Scholar
  23. Halle, M., Stevens, K. N. Speech recognition: a model and a program for research. In J. A. Fodor J. J. Katz (Eds.), The Structure of Language, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1962.Google Scholar
  24. Ingram, D. The relationship between comprehension and production. In R. L. Schiefelbusch L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language perspectives—acquisition, retardation, and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  25. Ingram, D. Phonological disability in children. New York: Elsevier, 1976.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson, W. People in quandries. New York: Harper, 1946.Google Scholar
  27. Johnston, J. M., Johnston, G. T. Modification of consonant speech-sound articulation in young children. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 1972, 5, 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kent, R. D. Models of speech production. In N. J. Lass (Ed.), Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics. New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  29. Ladefoged, P. A phonetic study of West African languages. London: Cambridge University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  30. Lenneberg, E. H. Understanding language without ability to speak: A case report. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 65, 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leonard, L. B. The nature of deviant articulation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1973, 38, 156–161.Google Scholar
  32. Leonard, L. B., Webb, C. An automated therapy program for articulatory correction. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1971, 14, 338–344.Google Scholar
  33. Lewis, J., Daniloff, R., Hammarberg, R. Apical coarticulation at juncture boundaries. Journal of Phonetics, 1975, 3, 1–8.Google Scholar
  34. Liberman, A. M. Personal communication, 1977.Google Scholar
  35. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Harris, K. S., MacNeilage, P. F. A motor theory of speech perception. Proceedings of the speech communication seminar. Stockholm, 1962. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, 1963.Google Scholar
  36. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., Studdert-Kennedy. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 431–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lieberman, P. Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech, 1963, 6, 172–187.Google Scholar
  38. Locke, J. L., Kutz, K. J. Memory for speech and speech for memory. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1975, 18, 176–191.Google Scholar
  39. MacNeilage, P. F., Rootes, T. P., Chase, R. A. Speech production and perception in a patient with severe impairment of somesthetic perception and motor control. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1967, 10, 449–467.Google Scholar
  40. McDonald, E. T. Articulation testing and treatment.- A sensory motor approach. Pittsburgh: Stanwix House, 1964.Google Scholar
  41. McLean, J. E. Extending stimulus control of phoneme articulation by operant techniques. In F. L. Girardeau J. E. Spradlin (Eds.), A functional analysis approach to speech and languge: ASHA Monograph, 1970, 14, 24–47.Google Scholar
  42. McLean, J. E. Articulation. In L. L. Lloyd (Ed.), Communication assessment and intervention strategies. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  43. McReynolds, L. V. Articulation generalization during articulation training. Language and Speech, 1972, 15, 149–155.Google Scholar
  44. McReynolds, L. V., Bennett, S. Distinctive feature generalization in articulation training. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1972, 37, 462–470.Google Scholar
  45. McReynolds, L. V., Kohn, J., Williams, G. Articulatory-defective children’s discrimination of their production errors. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1975, 40, 327–338.Google Scholar
  46. Menyuk, P., Anderson, S. Children’s identification and reproduction of /wi, /r/, and /1/. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1969, 5, 39–52.Google Scholar
  47. Milisen, R. A rational for articulation disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. Monograph supplement, 1954, 4, 6–17.Google Scholar
  48. Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R., Liberman, A. M., Jenkins, J. J., Fujimura, O. An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of /r/ and /1/ by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception and Psychophysics, 1975, 18, 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Monnin, L. M., Huntington, D. A. Relationship of articulatory defects to speech-sound identification. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1974, 17, 352–366.Google Scholar
  50. Moskowitz, A. I. The acquisition of phonology and syntax: a preliminary study. In K. J. J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcsik P. Suppes (Eds.), Approaches to natural language. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1973.Google Scholar
  51. Pickett, J. M., Pollack, I. Intelligibility of excerpts from fluent speech: Effects of rate of utterance and duration of excerpt. Language and Speech, 1963, 6, 151–164.Google Scholar
  52. Poole, I. Genetic development of articulation of consonant sounds in speech. Elementary English Review, 1934, 11, 159–161.Google Scholar
  53. Prather, E. M., Hedrick, D. L., Kern, C. A. Articulation development in children aged two to four years. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1975, 40, 179–191.Google Scholar
  54. Prins, T. D. Analysis of correlations among various articulatory deviations. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1962, 5, 152–160.Google Scholar
  55. Ruder, K. F., Smith, M., Hermann, P. Effects of verbal imitation and comprehension on verbal production of lexical items. In L. McReynolds (Ed.), Developing systematic procedures for training children’s language: American Speech and Hearing Association Monographs, 1974, 18, 15–29.Google Scholar
  56. Ruder, K. F., Hermann, P., Schiefelbusch, M. Effects of verbal imitation and comprehension training on verbal production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1977, 6, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ryan, B. P. A study in the effectiveness of the S-pack in the elimination of frontal lisping behavior in third grade children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1971, 36, 390–396.Google Scholar
  58. Schmauch, V. A., Panagos, J. M., Klich, R. J. Syntax influences the accuracy of consonant production in language-disordered children. Journal of Communications Disorders, 1978, 11, 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shelton, R. L., Johnson, A. F., Arndt, W. Monitoring and reinforcement by parents as a means of automating articulatory responses. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1972, 35, 759–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Slobin, D. I. Data for the Symposium. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The ontogenesis of grammar. New York: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  61. Snow, C. E., Ferguson, C. A. (Ed.), Talking to the children: Language input and acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  62. Snow, K. A comparative study of sound substitutions used by “normal” first grade children. Speech Monographs, 1964, 31, 135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Spriestersbach, D. C., Curtis, J. F. Misarticulation and discrimination of speech sounds. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1951, 37, 483–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Templin, M. C. Certain language skills in children, their development and interrelationships. Institute of Child Welfare, Monograph Series, No. 26. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  65. Van Riper, C. Speech correction, principles and methods. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1978. (Originally published, 1939.)Google Scholar
  66. Verbrugge, R. R., Strange, W., Shankweiler, D. P., Edman, T. R. What information enables a listener to map a talker’s vowel space? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976, 60, 198–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Warren,.R. M. Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science, 1970, 167, 392–393.Google Scholar
  68. Weir, R. H. Language in the crib. The Hague: Mouton, 1962.Google Scholar
  69. Williams, G. S., McReynolds, L. V. The relationship between discrimination and articulation training in children with misarticulations. Journal of Speech Hearing Research, 1975, 40, 401–412.Google Scholar
  70. Winitz, H. Articulatory acquistion and behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1969.Google Scholar
  71. Winitz, H. From syllable to conversation. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  72. Winitz, H. (Ed.). The comprehension approach to foreign language instruction. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, in press.Google Scholar
  73. Winitz, H., Bellerose, B. Relation between sound discrimination and sound learning. Journal of Communication Disorders, 1967, 1, 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Winitz, H., Bellerose, B. Effect of similarity of sound substitutions on retention. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1972, 15, 677–689.Google Scholar
  75. Winitz, H., LaRiviere, C. Factors contributing to the recovery of monosyllabic words excerpted from natural speech. Journal of Phonetics, 1979, 7, 225–233.Google Scholar
  76. Winitz, H., Preisler, L. Discrimination pretraining and sound learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1965, 20, 905–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Winitz, H., LaRiviere, C., Herriman, E. Perception of word boundaries under conditions of lexical bias. Phonetica, 1973, 27, 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wright, V., Shelton, R. L., Arndt, W. B. A task for the evaluation of articulation change. III. Imitative task scores compared with scores for spontaneous tasks. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1969, 12, 875–885.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harris Winitz
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Speech and Hearing ScienceUniversity of Missouri-Kansas CityKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations