Recovery and Rehabilitation of Adult Aphasic Patients

Relevant Research Advances
  • Christy L. Ludlow


If we compare the amount of knowledge we have acquired in aphasia with the amount of knowledge we still need to acquire, the latter must be regarded as the more sizable portion. In contrast with some of the other disorders speech—language pathologists deal with, at least the cause of this communication disorder is known. However, although the cause of aphasia can be assumed to be brain damage affecting the hemisphere dominant for language (usually the left), there is a great deal more we don’t know. We have as yet to understand the answers to the following questions:
  • What brain mechanisms are responsible for the different symptoms seen in aphasic patients?

  • What is the neurological basis for language recovery when it does take place?

  • Are aphasic symptoms due to the language remaining in the left hemisphere or due to the limited ability of the right hemisphere to perform?

  • What is the most effective method of language therapy?

  • What are the factors that can predict an individual patient’s prognosis for language recovery?


Spontaneous Speech Language Performance Aphasic Patient Auditory Comprehension Global Aphasia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alajouanine, T. Verbal realization in aphasia. Brain, 1956, 79, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alajouanine, T., Ombredane, A., Durand, M. Le Syndrome de disintegration phonétique dans l’aphasie. Paris: Masson, 1939.Google Scholar
  3. Albert, M., Sparks, R. W., Helm, N. A. Melodic intonation therapy for aphasia. Archives of Neurology, 1973, 29, 130–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bay, E. Aphasia and nonverbal disorders of language. Brain, 1962, 84, 412–426.Google Scholar
  5. Benton, A. L. Problems of test construction in the field of aphasia. Cortex, 1967, 3, 32–58.Google Scholar
  6. Beyn, E. S., Shokhor-Trotskaya, M. K. The preventive method of speech rehabilitation in aphasia. Cortex, 1966, 2, 96–108.Google Scholar
  7. Blumstein, S., Cooper. W. Hemispheric processing of intonational contours. Cortex, 1974, 10, 146–158.Google Scholar
  8. Boller, F., Vignolo, L. A. Latent sensory aphasia in hemisphere-damaged patients: An experimental study with the Token Test. Brain, 1966, 89, 830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borkowski, J. G., Benton, A. L., Spreen, O. Word fluency and brain damage. Neuropsychologia, 1967, 5, 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brain, R. Speech disorders: Aphasia, apraxia, and agnosia ( 2nd ed. ). London: Butterworths, 1965.Google Scholar
  11. Butfield, E., Zangwill, O. L. Reeducation in aphasia: A review of 70 cases. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 1946, 9, 75–79.Google Scholar
  12. Caramazza, A., Berndt, R. A. Semantic and syntactic processes in aphasia: A review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 1978, 85, 898–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caramazza, A., Zurif, E. B. Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 1976, 3, 16–27.Google Scholar
  14. Culton, G. L. Spontaneous recovery from aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1969, 12, 825–832.Google Scholar
  15. Darley, F. L. The efficacy of language rehabilitation in aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1972, 37, 3–21.Google Scholar
  16. Darley, F. L. Treatment of acquired aphasia. In W. J. Friedlander (Ed.), Advances in Neurology: Volume 7. New York: Raven Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  17. De Renzi, E., Vignola, L. The Token Test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain, 1962, 85, 665–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Renzi, E. The Reporter’s Test: A sensitive test to detect expressive disturbances in aphasics. Cortex, 1978, 14, 279–293.Google Scholar
  19. Eisenson, J. Aphasia in adults. New York: Harper and Row, 1973.Google Scholar
  20. Fillenbaum, S., Jones, L. V., Wepman, J. M. Some linguistic features of speech from aphasic patients. Language and Speech, 1961, 4, 91–108.Google Scholar
  21. Gazzaniga, M. S. The split brain in man. Scientific American, 1967, 217, 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gazzaniga, M. S., LeDoux, J. E., Wilson, D. H. Language, praxis, and the right hemisphere: Clues to some mechanisms of consciousness. Neurology, 1977, 27, 1144–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geschwind, N. Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. Brain, 1965, 88, 237–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Geschwind, N. Language and the brain. Scientific American, 1972, 226, 76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geschwind, N., Segarra, J., Quadfasel, F. A. Isolation of the speech area. Neuropsychologia, 1968, 7, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gleason, J. B., Goodglass, H., Green, E., Ackerman, N., Hyde, M. R. The retrieval of syntax in Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 1975, 7, 451–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Godfrey, C. M. A dysphagia rehabilitation clinic. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 1959, 80, 616–618.Google Scholar
  28. Godrey, C. M., Douglas, E. The recovery process in aphasia. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 1959, 80, 618–624.Google Scholar
  29. Goldstein, K. Language and language disturbance. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1948.Google Scholar
  30. Goodglass, H. Studies on the grammar of aphasics. In S. Rosenberg and J. Kopkin (Eds.), Developments in applied psycholinguistics research. New York: Macmillan, 1968.Google Scholar
  31. Goodglass, H. Agrammatism. In H. Whitaker and H. A. Whitaker (Eds.), Studies in neurolinguistics (Vol. 1 ). New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  32. Goodglass, H., Baker, E. Semantic field, naming, and auditory comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 1976, 3, 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goodglass, H., Hunt, J. Grammatical complexity and aphasic speech. Word, 1958, 4, 197–207.Google Scholar
  34. Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea Febiger, 1972.Google Scholar
  35. Goodglass, H., Barton, M. E., Kaplan, E. Sensory modality and object naming in aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1968, 11, 488–496.Google Scholar
  36. Goodglass, H., Gleason, J., Hyde, M. Some dimensions of auditory language comprehension in aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1970, 13, 595–606.Google Scholar
  37. Goodglass, H., Gleason, J. B., Bernholz, N. A., Hyde, M. R. Some linguistic structures in the speech of a Broca’s aphasic. Cortex, 1972, 7, 191–212.Google Scholar
  38. Green, E. On the contribution of studies in aphasia to psycholinguistics. Cortex, 1970, 6, 216–235.Google Scholar
  39. Hagen, C. The effect of speech and language therapy on communication disordered stroke patients. Paper presented at the convention of the American Speech and Hearing Association, New York, November, 1970.Google Scholar
  40. Head, H. Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech. New York: Macmillan, 1926.Google Scholar
  41. Helm, N. Criteria for selecting aphasic patients for melodic intonation therapy. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., 1978.Google Scholar
  42. Henri, B. P., Canter, G. J. A longitudinal investigation of patterns of language recovery in eight recent aphasics. Paper presented at the American Speech and Hearing Association Convention, Washington, D.C., November 1975.Google Scholar
  43. Holland, A. L. Psycholinguistic and behavioral variables underlying recovery from aphasia (Project No. RD-3116-SH-69). Final Report submitted to Social Rehabilitation Service, June 1971.Google Scholar
  44. Holland, A. Estimators of aphasia patients’ communicative performance in daily life. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., 1978.Google Scholar
  45. Holland, A. Estimators of aphasic patients’ communicative performances in daily life (Contract No. NOI-NS-5–2317). Final Progress Report to the Communicative Disorders Program, the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1978.Google Scholar
  46. Holland, A. A measure of communicative abilities in daily living. Takoma Park, Md.: University Park Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  47. Howes, D. Hypotheses concerning the functions of the language mechanism. In K. Salzinger S. Salzinger (Eds.), Research in verbal behavior and some neurophysical implications. New York: Academic Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  48. Howes, D., Geschwind, N. Quantitative studies of aphasic language. In D. Rioch E. Weinstein (Eds.), Disorders of communication. Baltimore: Williams Wilkins, 1964.Google Scholar
  49. Jakobson, R. Aphasia as a linguistic problem. In S. Saporta J. R. Bastian (Eds.), Psycholinguistics: A book of readings. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston, 1961.Google Scholar
  50. Karlin, I. W., Eisenson, J., Hirschenfang, S., Miller, M. H. A mutlievaluational study of aphasic and non-aphasic right hemiplegic patients. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1959, 24, 369–379.Google Scholar
  51. Kenin, M., Swisher, L. P. A study of pattern of recovery in aphasia. Cortex, 1972, 8, 56–68.Google Scholar
  52. Kerschensteiner, M., Poeck, K., Brunner, E. The fluency-non-fluency dimension in the classification of aphasic speech. Cortex, 1972, 8, 233–247.Google Scholar
  53. Kertesz, A., McCabe, P. Recovery patterns and prognosis in aphasia. Brain. 1977, 100, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kinsboume, M. The minor hemisphere as a source of aphasic speech. Archives of Neurology, 1971, 25, 302–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kriendler, A., Fradis, A. Performance in aphasia: A neurodynamical diagnostic and psychological study. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1968.Google Scholar
  56. Levy, J. Lateral differences in the human brain in cognition and behavioral control. In Buser Rougeul-Buser (Eds.), Cerebral correlates of conscious experience I NSER M Symposium No. 6. New York: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  57. Levy, J., Trevarthen, C. Perceptual, semantic and phonetic aspects of elementary language processes in split-brain patients. Brain, 1977, 100, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ludlow, C. L. The recovery of syntax in aphasia. Paper read at the Academy of Aphasia, Albuquerque, New Mexico, October 1973.Google Scholar
  59. Ludlow, C. L. Recovery from aphasia: A foundation for treatment. In M. Sullivan M. S. Kommers (Eds.), Rationale for adult aphasia Therapy. Omaha: University of Nebraska Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  60. Ludlow, C. L., Swisher, L. P. The audiometric evaluation of adult aphasics. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1971, 14, 535–543.Google Scholar
  61. Luria, A. R. Restoration of function after brain injury. New York: Macmillan, 1963.Google Scholar
  62. Luria, A. R. Factors and forms of aphasia. In A. V. De Reuck M. O’Connor (Eds.), Ciba foundation symposium in disorders of language. Boston: Little, Brown, 1964.Google Scholar
  63. Luria, A. R. Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books, 1966.Google Scholar
  64. Luria, A. R. The functional organization of the brain. Scientific American, 1970, 222, 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Luria, A. R. Traumatic aphasia. The Hague: Mouton, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Maruszewski, M. Neuropsychology in neurological rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the XVIth international congress of applied psychology, Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger, 1969.Google Scholar
  67. Miller, M. H. Audiologie evaluation of aphasic patients. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1960, 25, 333–339.Google Scholar
  68. Moscovitch, M. On the representation of language in the right hemisphere of right-handed people. Brain and Language, 1976, 3, 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Myerson, R., Goodglass, H. Transformational grammars of three agrammatic patients. Language and Speech, 1972, 15, 40–50.Google Scholar
  70. Neilsen, J. M. Spontaneous recovery from aphasia: Autopsy (Report of a case). Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Society, 1935, 18, 147–148.Google Scholar
  71. Penfield, W. Conditioning the uncommitted cortex for language learning. Brain, 1965, 88, 787–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Porch, B. E. Porch index of communicative ability. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  73. Prins, R. S., Snow, C. E., Wagenaar. Recovery from aphasia: Spontaneous speech versus language comprehension. Brain and Language, 1978, 6, 192–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Saffran, E. M., Marin, O. S. Immediate memory for word lists and sentences in a patient with deficient auditory short-term memory. Brain and Language, 1975, 2, 420–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sands, E., Samo, M. T., Shankweiler, D. Long-term assessment of language function in aphasia due to stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1969, 50, 202–207.Google Scholar
  76. Sarno, M. T., Levita, E. Natural course of recovery in severe aphasia. Archives of Physical bedicine and Rehabilitation, 1971, 52, 175–179.Google Scholar
  77. Samo, M. T., Silverman, M., Sands, E. Speech therapy and language recovery in severe aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1970, 13, 609–623.Google Scholar
  78. Schuell, H. M. Diagnosis and prognosis in aphasia. A MA Archives of Neurological Psychiatry, 1955, 44, 308–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schuell, H. Differential diagnosis of aphasia with the Minnesota Test. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  80. Schuell, H., Jenkins, J. J., Jimenez-Pabon, E. Aphasia in adults. New York: Harper and Row, 1964.Google Scholar
  81. Sparks, R. W., Holland, A. L. Method: melodic intonation therapy for aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1976, 41, 287–297.Google Scholar
  82. Sparks, R., Helm, N., Albert, M. Aphasia rehabilitation resulting from melodic intonation therapy. Cortex, 1974, 10, 303–316.Google Scholar
  83. Spellacy, F. Lateral preferences in the identification of patterned stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1970, 47, 574–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Spreen, O., Benton, A. L. Neurosensory center comprehensive examination for aphasia (Rev. ed.). Victoria, B.C.: University of Victoria, 1969.Google Scholar
  85. Spreen, O., Benton, A. L., Van Allen, M. W. Dissociation of visual and tactile naming in amnesic aphasia. Neurology, 1966, 16, 807–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Street, B. Hearing loss in aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1957, 22, 60–67.Google Scholar
  87. Subirana, A. The prognosis in aphasia in relation to cerebral dominance and handedness. Brain, 1958, 81, 415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Swisher, L. P., Sarno, M. T. Token test scores of three matched patient groups: Left brain-damaged with aphasia; right brain-damaged without aphasia; non-brain-damaged. Cortex, 1969, 5, 264–273.Google Scholar
  89. Terr, M., Goetzinger, C., Konsey, C. A study of hearing acuity in adult aphasic and cerebral palsied subjects. Archives of Otolaryngology, 1958, 67, 447–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vignolo, L. A. Evolution of aphasia and language rehabilitation: A retrospective exploratory study. Cortex, 1964, 1, 344–367.Google Scholar
  91. Warrington, E. K., Shallice, T. The selective impairment of auditory verbal short-term memory. Brain, 1969, 92, 885–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Warrington, E. K., Logue, V., Pratt, R. T. The anatomical localization of selective impairment of auditory verbal short-term memory. Neuropsychologica, 1971, 9, 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Weigl, E. On the problem of cortical syndromes: Experimental studies. In M. L. Simmel (Ed.), The reach of the mind: Essays in memory of Kurt Goldstein. New York: Springer, 1968.Google Scholar
  94. Weigl, E., Bierwisch, M. Neuropsychology and linguistics: Topics of common research. Foundations of Language, 1970, 6, 1–18.Google Scholar
  95. Weisenberg, T. H., McBride, K. E. Aphasia. New York: Commonwealth Fund, 1935.Google Scholar
  96. Wepman, J. M. A conceptual model for the processes involved in recovery from aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1953, 18, 4–13.Google Scholar
  97. Wepman, J. M. Jones, L. Five aphasias: A commentary on aphasia as a regressive linguistic phenomenon. In D. Rioch E. Wienstein (Eds.), Disorders of communication. Baltimore: Williams Wilkins, 1964.Google Scholar
  98. Wepman, J. M. Jones, L. V. Aphasia: Diagnostic description and therapy. In W. S. Fields W. A. Spencer (Eds.), Stroke rehabilitation: Basic concepts and research needs. St. Louis: Warren Green, 1967.Google Scholar
  99. Whitehouse, P., Caramazza, A., Zurif, E. Naming in aphasia: Interacting effects of form and function. Brain and Language, 1978, 6, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zaidel, E. Lexical organization in the right hemisphere. In Buser Rougeul-Buser (Eds.), Cerebral correlates of conscious experience, INSERM Symposium No. 6. New York: Elsevier/NorthHolland Biomedical Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  101. Zaidel, E. The split and half brains as models of congenital language disability. In C. L. Ludlow M. E. Doran-Quine (Eds.), Neurological bases of langauge disorders in children: Methods and directions for research. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1980.Google Scholar
  102. Zurif, E. B., Caramazza, A. Psycholinguistic structures in aphasia. In H. Whitaker H. A. Whitaker (Eds.), Studies in neurolinguistics (Vol. 1 ). New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christy L. Ludlow
    • 1
  1. 1.Communicative Disorders ProgramNational Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and StrokeBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations