Strong and Weak Statements in the Theory of Dipolar (e,2e) Impact Ionization

  • Yuri V. Popov
  • Victor A. Knyr
  • Leonid V. Stotland
  • Viacheslav V. Nasyrov
Part of the Physics of Atoms and Molecules book series (PAMO)

Abstract

The correct theory must be predictable. This is an axiom. We beleive that a single ionization of targets by fast projectile electrons, or (e,2e)-experiments can supply us with a new information about delicate and subtle atomic effects, and an aim of the theory is to identify them. The dipolar kinematics of (e,2e) experiments in this respect are the most debatable. The matter of fact that even in the case of fast incident electrons the matrix element includes the overlap of initial and final targets’ wave functions which in turn are very complex objects. Using more or less crude models of these wave functions for calculations we are not only able to predict something but even differ between models. Thus we must look for special kinematical conditions to make definite theoretical conclusions.

Keywords

Wave Function Triple Differential Cross Section High Incident Energy Kinematical Domain Coulomb Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Duguet, M. Cherid, A. Lahmam-Bennani, A. Franz, and H. Klar, High—accuracy (e,2e) cross sections for helium: reference data in the first Born approximation, J.Phys.B: At.Mol.Phys., 20: 6145 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Dupre, A. Lahmam-Bennani, A. Duguet, F. Mota-Furtado, P.F. O’Mahony, and C. Dal Cappello, (e,2e) triple differential cross sections for the simultaneous ionization and excitation of helium, J.Phys.B: At.Mol.Opt.Phys., 25: 259 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.S. Kheifets, I. Bray, I.E. McCarthy, and B. Shang, Theoretical triple differential cross section of the helium atom ionization with excitation to the n=2 ion state, Phys.Rev.A, 50: 4700 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V.A. Knyr, V.V. Nasyrov, L.Y. Stotland, and Y.V. Popov, Application of the J-matrix method to problems of single ionization of atoms by fast electrons, JETP, 22: 190 (1996).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Mota-Furtado and P.F. O’MVlahony, The R-matrix method in second Born calculations of electron impact ionization of atoms: case study for helium, J.Phys.B: At.Mol.Opt.Phys., 21: 137 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y.V. Popov and LE. Shabalina, Notes on dipolar (e,2e) reactions, J.Phys.B:At.Mol.Opt.Phys., 21: L855 (1986).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Stefani, M.V. Marabello, L. Avaldi, and R. Camilloni, Does asymmetric (e,2e) approach the dipolar limit at intermediate energies?, in: (e,2e) and Related Processes, C.T. Whelan, H.R.J. Walters, A. Lahmani-Bennani, and H. Ehrhardt, ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London (1993).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.A. Bonham and D.A. Kohl, Simple correlated wavefunctions for the ground state of heliumlike atoms, J. Cheru.Phys., 45: 2471 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Draeger, G. Handke, W. Ihra, and H. Friedrich, One-and two-electron excitations of helium in the s-wave model, Phys.Rev.A, 50: 3793 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuri V. Popov
    • 1
  • Victor A. Knyr
    • 2
  • Leonid V. Stotland
    • 2
  • Viacheslav V. Nasyrov
    • 2
  1. 1.Nuclear Physics InstituteMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsKhabarovsk State Technical UniversityKhabarovskRussia

Personalised recommendations