Characterizing the Quantum State of Matter Using Emission Tomography

  • Ian. A. Walmsley
  • Thomas J. Dunn
  • John N. Sweetser
Conference paper


Recent advances in laser technology have stimulated a revival of interest in the study of wave packets in atoms,[1] molecules[2] and in the solid-state.[3] In many experiments, particularly those on atoms and molecules, the aim is to engineer a specific state. Control of the system at the quantum level is intended to initiate a dynamic which can subsequently lead to a desired conclusion; the favoring of a particular dissociation pathway in a molecule, for example, or the generation of states that most closely mimic the dynamics of the equivalent classical system in a Rydberg atom perhaps. In all cases, however, the details of the state prepared by experiment has been inferred from a more or less detailed knowledge of the electric field of the pulse that is used to drive the system. This inference clearly stands or falls on the ability to fully characterize the driving field, but in fact most of the measurements of the nonstationary atomic or molecular states are not sensitive to the full quantum structure of the underlying wave packet, so that a lack of knowledge of the driving pulse is offset by a relatively coarse measurement of the state of the matter system. This is a particularly pressing problem for experiments in which data is acquired over an ensemble of pulses, since then it is impossible to calculate the density matrix unless the statistical properties of the generating pulse ensemble is known. Techniques for complete characterization of a partially-coherent ensemble of optical pulses have only recently been developed.[4]


Wave Packet Wigner Function Excited Electronic State Observation Window Time Gate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Yeazell, J.N., M. Mallalieu, and C.R. Stroud Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett., 64, 2007, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. Kohler, B., et al,“Quantum control of vibrational dynamics with tailored light pulses”, in Ultrafast Phenomena IX,G.A. Mourou, et al,Editor. 1994, Springer-Verlag: Berlin.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hu, B.B., et al. “Optical Enhancement of THz Emission from Bulk GaAs.” in Ultrafast Phenomena IX. 1994. Dana Point, CA: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DeLong, K. et al, Opt. Lett., 19, 2152, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vinogradov, A.V. and J. Janszky, Phys. Rev. Lett., 64, 2771, 1990.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Janszky, J., et al., Phys. Rev. A, 50 (2), 1777, 1994.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Walmsley, I.A. and M.G. Raymer, Phys. Rev. A, 52 (1), 681, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eberly, J.H. and K. Wodkiewicz, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 67, 2591, 1979.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kowalczyk, P., et al., Phys. Rev. A, 42, 5622, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dunn, T.J., et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 70 (22), 3388, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dunn, T.J., I.A. Walmsley, and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. Lett., 74 (6), 884, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vogel, K. and H. Risken, Phys. Rev. A, 40 (5), 2847, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Natterer, F., The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography. 1986, New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smithey, D., et al,Physica Scripta, T48 35, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian. A. Walmsley
    • 1
  • Thomas J. Dunn
    • 1
  • John N. Sweetser
    • 1
  1. 1.The Institute of OpticsUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations