Kant, Wittgenstein, Objectivity, and Structural Equations Modeling

  • Stanley A. Mulaik
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)


Since 1980 I have written a number of papers on how philosophy of science themes relate to statistical practices. My earliest and latest efforts in this regard have exposed and criticized the pervasive influence of classical empiricism on multivariate statistical practice (Mulaik 1985, 1987a, 1988, 1991a, in press). Classical multivariate statistics, I argue, are but mathematical emulations of the associative processes that empiricism postulated were the basis by which we acquire knowledge. But empiricism is no longer the received view of the philosophy of science and should no longer be the philosophical foundation on which multivariate statistical practice rests.


Latent Variable Sense Impression Common Concept Associative Process Pure Reason 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baker, G. P. (1974). Criteria. A new foundation for semantics. Ratio, 16, 156–189.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Hills, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, P. W. (1986). Wittgenstein and defining criteria. In J. V. Canfield, (Ed.), Thephilosophy of Wittgenstein: Criteria. (Vol. 7, pp. 373–387 ). New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
  4. Birkeland, J. (1949). Microbiology and man. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  5. Canfield, J. V. (1986). The grammar of grammar. In J. V. Canfield, (Ed.), The philosophy of Wittgenstein: Logical necessity and rules. (Vol. 10, pp. 138–172 ). New York: GarlandGoogle Scholar
  6. Press, 1986. [Originally published in Canfield, J. V. (1971). Wittgenstein, language and world (pp. 172–203, 225–226)].Google Scholar
  7. Ellington, J. The unity of Kant’s thought in his philosophy of nature. In I. Kant, Metaphysical foundations of natural science. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1970.Google Scholar
  8. Friedrich, C. J. (1949). Introduction. The philosophy of Kant: Immanuel Kant’s moral and political writings. New York: The Modern Library/Random House.Google Scholar
  9. Garrison, J. W. (1986). Some principles of postpositivistic philosophy of science. Educational Researcher, 15, 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hacker, P. M. S. (1986). Insight and illusion: Themes in the philosophy of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Henrich, D. (1989). Kant’s notion of a deduction and the methodological background of the first critique. In E. Förester, (Ed.), Kant’s transcendental deductions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Herder, J. G. (1967). Essay on The Origin of Language. In On the origin of language, A. Gode, trans. New York: F. Ungar.Google Scholar
  13. Kant, I. (1965). [The critique of pure reason]. Tra. N. K. Smith. New York: St. Martin’s Press, [Originally published 1781 as Critik der reinen Vernunft. Riga: Friedrich Hartknoch. Revised in 1787 ].Google Scholar
  14. Kant, I. (1911). [Critique of judgment]. Werner S. Pluhar, trans. Indianapolis: Hacket Publishing Co. ( Originally published in Prussia in 1790 ).Google Scholar
  15. Kant, I. (1970). [Metaphysical foundations of natural science]. J. Ellington trans. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. [Original published 1786 as Die metaphysichen Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft]. Google Scholar
  16. Kant, I. (1977). [Prolegomena to any future metaphysics]. P. Carus, trans. 1902; revised by J. Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co. [Originally published 1783 ]Google Scholar
  17. Kant, I. (1988). [Logic]. R. S. Hartman and W. Schwarz, trans. New York: Dover Publications, 1988. [Originally published 1800 as Immanuel Kants Logik: Ein Handbuch zu Vorlesungen. Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius.]Google Scholar
  18. Magill, F. N., & McGreal, I. P. (Eds.) (1961). The analysis of the sensations-Ernst Mach. In Masterpieces of World Philosophy in Summary Form. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  19. Mulaik, S. A. (1985). Exploratory statistics and empiricism. Philosophy of Science, 52, 410–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mulaik, S. A. (1986). Toward a synthesis of deterministic and probabilistic formulations of causal relations by the functional relation concept. Philosophy of Science, 53, 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mulaik, S A (1987a). Toward a conception of causality applicable to experimentation and causal modeling. Child Development, 58, 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mulaik, S. A. (1987b). A brief history of the philosophical foundations of exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 22, 267–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mulaik, S. A. (1988). Confirmatory factor analysis. In R. B. Cattell, and J. R. Nesselroade, (Eds.), Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  24. Mulaik, S. A. (1990). Blurring the distinctions between component analysis and common factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mulaik, S. A. (1991). Factor analysis, information-transforming instruments, and objectivity: A reply and discussion. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 42, 87100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mulaik, S. A. (in press). The critique of pure statistics. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology, Volume 3,Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S. and Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mulaik, S. A. and McDonald, R. P. (1978). The effect of additional variables on factor indeterminacy in models with a single common factor. Psychometrika, 43, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mulholland, L. A. (1990). Kant’s system of rights. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Pearson, K. (1911). The grammar of science. Part I: Physical. London: Adam and Charles Black [Originally published 1892 ]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenberg, J. F. (1986). The thinking self. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rousseau, J. J. (1967). Essay on the origin of language. In J. Moran, Trans., On the origin of language. (First published posthumously in 1781 ).Google Scholar
  33. Rousseau, J. J. (1762/1913). The Social Contract. G. D. H. Cole (translator). London: J. M. Dent. (Originally published 1762.)Google Scholar
  34. Schouls, P. A. (1980). The imposition of method: A study of Descartes and Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schwyzer, H. (1990). The unity of understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  37. Suter, R. (1989). Interpreting Wittgenstein. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Thurstone, L. L. (1947). Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Williams, M. (1990). Wittgenstein, Kant, and the “Metaphysics of Experience.” Kant-Studien, 81, 69–88.Google Scholar
  39. Williams, T. C. (1987). The unity of Kant’s critique of pure reason. Lewiston/Queenston: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  40. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stanley A. Mulaik
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations