Abstract
Previous chapters have identified some interventionist features of mental health practice in the community that lead practitioners or observers to describe them as “aggressive” or “assertive” or “tenacious.” The purpose of this chapter is to consider the legal implications of these practices. This is unexplored terrain, so our goal is a modest one: We aim to sketch a framework, and offer a conceptual vocabulary, for thinking about these practices and for connecting them to established legal ideas. By identifying possible concerns, we do not aim to raise objections to aggressive community treatment. To the contrary, we recognize the benevolent aims of most interventions as well as their value in a community treatment model. Our purpose in identifying possible legal or ethical concerns is to heighten practitioners’ awareness of potential conflicts and, in this way, to help them shape appropriate guidelines.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, A. (1988). Uneasy access: Privacy for women in a free society. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
Allen, P. (1976). A bill of rights for citizens using outpatient mental health services. In H. Richard Lamb et al. (Eds.), Community survival for long-term patents (pp. 147176 ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Appelbaum, P., Sr Grisso, T. (1995). The MacArthur treatment competence study. III. Abilities of patients to consent to psychiatric and medical treatments. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 149–174.
Brown v. Bowen, 845 F. 2d 1211 (1988).
Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 (1966).
Carr v. Friends of the Homeless, Inc., No. 89-LE-3492-S Mass. Housing Court, Hampden Division (1990).
Carroll, J. (1991). Consent to mental health treatment: A theoretical analysis of coercion, freedom, and control. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 9, 129–142.
Chamberlain, J. (1978). On our own: Patient-controlled alternatives to the mental health system. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Collin, R. M., and Collin, R. W. (1991). Are the poor entitled to privacy? Harvard Blackletter Journal, 8, 181–219.
Farrell, M. (1992). Administrative paternalism: Social Security’s representative payment and two models of justice. Cardozo Law Review, 14, 283–349.
Franklin v. U.S. Postal Service, 48 Emp. Prac. Dec. 138,482 (S.D. Ohio 1988 ).
Geller, J. (1986a). The quandaries of enforced community treatment and unenforceable outpatient commitment statutes. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 14, 149–158.
Geller, J. (1986b). Rights, wrongs, and the dilemma of coerced community treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 1259–1264.
Griffen v. Wisconsin, 483 U.S. 868 (1987).
Hiday, V. (1992). Coercion in civil commitment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 15, 359–377.
Hiday, V., and Scheid-Cook, T. L. (1990). Outpatient commitment for “revolving door” patients: Treatment and compliance. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 179, 85–90.
Hinds, J. (1990). Involuntary outpatient commitment for the chronically mentally ill. Nebraska Law Review, 69, 346–412.
In the Interest of T.D., A Child, 537 So.2d 173 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 1989).
Jaffe, D. J. (1994). How to reduce both violence and stigma. Innovations and Research, 3, 1–2.
Keilitz, I., and Hall, T. (1985). State statutes governing involuntary outpatient civil commitment. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 9, 378–397.
Klapper, A. (1993). Finding a right in state constitutions for the community treatment of the mentally ill. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 142, 739–835.
Maher v. Roe, 432 U.S. 453 (1977).
McCabe v. The City of Lynn, 875 F. Supp. 53 (D.Mass 1995 ).
McCafferty, G., and Dooley, J. (1990). Involuntary outpatient commitment: An update. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 14, 277–287.
McCloskey, H. J. (1965). A critique of the ideal of liberty. Mind, 74, 483–508.
McDonald, D., Sr Teitelbaum, M. (1994). Managing mentally ill offenders in the community: Milwaukee’s community support program. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Minsky, D., Riesser, G. G., and Duffy, M. (1995). The eye of the beholder: Housing preferences of inpatients and their treatment providers. Psychiatric Services, 46, 173–176.
Mulvey, E., Geller, J., and Roth, L. (1987). The promise and peril of involuntary outpatient commitment. American Psychologist, 42, 571–584.
Navarro, M. (1993, March 10). New York City to detain patients who fail to finish TB treatments. New York Times, pp. Al, B3.
O’Neil, R. M. (1966). Unconstitutional conditions: Welfare benefits with strings attached. California Law Review, 54, 443–478.
Parrish v. Civil Service Com’n of County of Alameda, 425 P. 2d 223 (1967).
Piazza, S. E., Ford, J., and Cogswell, S. H. (1991) Case management and representative payeeship as problems for homeless severely mentally disabled persons: Final report. Columbus: Ohio Department of Mental Health.
Rosen, C. (1990). The fourth amendment implications of urine testing for evidence of drug use in probation. Brooklyn Law Review, 55, 1159–1253.
Santos, A., Hawkins, G., Julius, B., Deci, P., Hierst, T., and Burns, B. (1993). A pilot study of assertive community treatment for patients with chronic psychotic disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 501–504.
Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966).
Schwartz, S., and Costanzo, C. (1987). Compelling treatment in the community: Distorted doctrines and violated values. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 20, 1346–1405. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives ’ Association, 489 U.S. 602 (1989).
Slobogin, C. (1994). Involuntary community treatment of people who are violent and mentally ill: A legal analysis. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 45, 685–689.
Stefan, S. (1987). Preventative commitment: The concept and its pitfalls. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 11, 288–302.
Sullivan, K. (1989). Unconstitutional conditions. Harvard Law Review, 102, 1413–1506.
Susser, E., Valencia, E., and Goldfinger, S. (1993). Clinical care of homeless mentally ill individuals: Strategies and adaptations. In H. Lamb, L. Bachrach, and F. Kass (Eds.), Treating the homeless mentally ill (pp. 127–140 ). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association Press.
Torrey, E. F. (1994). Violent behavior by individuals with serious mental illness. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 45, 653–662.
Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990).
Wertheimer, A. (1993). A philosophical examination of coercion for mental health issues. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, /1,239–258.
Wiggens v. State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 616 So.2d 127 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1993 ).
Wisor, R. (1993). Community care, competition and coercion: A legal perspective on privatized mental health care. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 19, 145–175. Wyman v. James, 400 U.S. 309 (1971).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berg, J.W., Bonnie, R.J. (1996). When Push Comes to Shove. In: Dennis, D.L., Monahan, J. (eds) Coercion and Aggressive Community Treatment. The Springer Series in Social Clinical Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9727-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9727-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9729-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9727-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive