A Large-Scale Experiment on the Growth and Predation Potential of Ctenophore Populations

  • M. R. Reeve
  • M. A. Walter


In reviewing the ecology of planktonic ctenophores, Walter (1976) pointed out how laboratory estimations of such parameters as growth, feeding and fecundity had been utilized to interpret population dynamics of ctenophores in the natural environment. In organisms with short life-cycles, which inhabit the water column, it is usually impossible to follow the growth and mortality characteristics of cohorts by the use of such techniques as size/frequency histograms. The observer can never be sure he is sampling the same population, over a period of time, and even if this were so, continuous breeding and rapid growth tend to quickly obscure the identification of distinct cohorts. It is also not possible to experimentally manipulate the population. This report describes an experiment in which plankton populations were studied in three containers for six weeks following empoundment of a water column and its natural plankton assemblage.


Predation Potential Planktonic Copepod Phytoplankton Standing Crop Saanich Inlet Size Frequency Histogram 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Baker, L. D. and M. R. Reeve, 1974. Laboratory culture of the lobate ctenophore Mnemiopsis mccradyi with notes on feeding and fecundity. Mar. Biol. 26: 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gauld, D. T., 1951. The grazing rate of planktonic copepods. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U. K. 29: 695–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hirota, J., 1972. Laboratory culture and metabolism of the planktonic ctenophore, Pleurobrachia bachei A. Agassiz. Pages 465–484 in A. Y. Takenouti et al., Eds., Biological Oceanography of the Northern North Pacific Ocean. Idemitsu Shoten, Tokyo, 626 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Hirota, J., 1974. Quantitative natural history of Pleurobrachia bachei in La Jolla Bight. Fish. Bull. U. S. 72: 295–335.Google Scholar
  5. Kremer, P. M., 1975. The ecology of the ctenophore, Mnemiopsis leidyi in Narragansett Bay. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rhode Island.Google Scholar
  6. Mullin, M. M. and E. R. Brooks, 1970. The effect of concentration of food on body weight, cumulative ingestion and rate of growth of the marine copepod Calanus helgolandicus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 15: 748–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mullin, M. M. and P. M. Evans, 1974. The use of a deep tank in plankton ecology. II. Efficiency of a planktonic food chain. Limnol. Oceanogr. 19: 902–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Paffenhöfer, G-A. and R. P. Harris, 1976. Feeding, growth and reproduction of the planktonic copepod Pseudocalanus elongatus Boeck. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U. K. (In press).Google Scholar
  9. Parsons, T. R., 1974. Controlled ecosystem pollution experiment (CEPEX). Environ. Cons. I: 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Reeve, M. R. and L. D. Baker, 1975. Production of two planktonic carnivores (chaetognath and ctenophore) in south Florida inshore waters. Fish. Bull. U. S. 73 238–248.Google Scholar
  11. Reeve, M. R., J. C. Gamble and M. A. Walter, 1976. The behavior of copepods and other zooplankton in copper contaminated enclosed water columns. Bull. Mar. Sci. 26: (In press).Google Scholar
  12. Steele, J. H., 1974. Spatial heterogeneity and population stability. Nature 248: 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Takahashi, M., W. H. Thomas, D. L. R. Seibert, J. Beers, P. Koeller and T. R. Parsons, 1975. The replication of events in enclosed water columns. Arch. Hydrobiol. 76: 5–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. R. Reeve
    • 1
  • M. A. Walter
    • 1
  1. 1.Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric ScienceUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations