Skip to main content

The Historical Development of Personality Assessment

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Applied Clinical Psychology ((NSSB))

Abstract

Understanding and predicting other people’s behavior have been important tasks in human interaction for as long as human beings have been social animals. Thus, our ancestors were likely practicing one form or another of personality assessment long before any written records of such activities were kept. Over the course of human evolution, the adaptive benefits of being able to understand and predict the behavior of both friends and foes would clearly have created an evolutionary advantage for those who possessed the ability to assess these important characteristics. This evolutionary process has resulted in a natural tendency for humans to assess the personalities of those with whom they come into contact. As humankind has developed and advanced, so have the means by which people assess each other’s personalities. Early primitive and intuitive ways gave way to more sophisticated and systematic attempts to assess, characterize, and predict human behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allport, F. H., & Allport, G. W. (1921). Personality traits: Their classification and measurement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 16, 6–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1928). A test for ascendence-submission. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 23, 118–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychosocial interpretation. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, H. G. (1939). Principles and practices of aviation medicine. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, L. H. (1926). Aviation medicine. Baltimore, MD. Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, S. J., & Molish, H. B. (1967). Rorschach’s test II. A variety of personality pictures. New York: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bejar, I. A. (1984). Educational diagnostic assessment. Journal of educational measurement, 21, 175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1990). Cross-cultural assessment of personality: The case for replicatory factor analysis. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 8, pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N. (1986). Computers in personality assessment: A brief past, an ebullient present, and an expanding future. Computers in Human behavior, 2, 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y S., & Butcher, J. N. (1989). Psychometric stability of rewritten MMPI items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 645–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y S., Slutske, W. S., & Butcher, J. N. (1989). A real-data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1, 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y S., Waller, N. G., Slutske, W. S., & Butcher, J. N. (1988, August). A comparison of two methods for adaptive administration of MMPI-2 content scales. Paper presented at the 96th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernreuter, R. G. (1933). The theory and construction of the personality inventory. Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 387–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. (1965). The challenge of response sets. New York: Meredith Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. (1989). Critique of the act frequency approach to personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 234–245.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloxom, B. M. (1978). Review of the 16PF. In G K. Buros (Ed.), Eighth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1077–1078). Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burisch, M. (1984). Approaches to personality assessment. American Psychologist, 39, 214–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1984). Toward a psychology of person-environment (PE) correlation: The role of spouse selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 361–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1983a). The dispositional analysis of everyday conduct. Journal of Personality, 51, 393–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1983b). The act-frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 96, 105–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1984). Acts, dispositions, and personality. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research: Normal personality processes (Vol. 13, pp. 241–301). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N. (Ed.). (1972). Objective personality assessment: Changing perspectives. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N. (1984). Current developments in MMPI use: An international perspective. In J. N. Butcher, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 4, pp. 119–137). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N. (1987a). Computerized psychological assessment: A practitioner’s guide. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N. (1987b). Computerized clinical and personality assessment using the MMPI. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Computerized psychological assessment: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 161–197). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N. (1989a). The Minnesota report: Adult clinical system. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N. (1989b). The Minnesota report: Personnel selection system. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Manual for the restandardized Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: MMPI-2. An administrative and interpretive guide. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., & Finn, S. (1983). Objective personality assessment in clinical settings. In M. Hersen, A. E. Kazdin, & A. S. Bellack (Eds.), The clinical psychology handbook (pp. 329–344). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Williams, C. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1990). Development and use of the MMPI-2 content scales. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., & Keller, L. S. (1984). Objective personality assessment. In G. Goldstein and M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment (pp. 307–331). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., Keller, L. S., & Bacon, S. F. (1985). Current developments and future directions in computerized personality assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 803–815.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. E., & Wilkinson, L. (1984). A latent trait analysis of the MMPI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 19, 385–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1965). The scientific analysis of personality. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1979). Personality and learning theory (Vol. 1). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B., & Eber, H. (1964). Manual for the 16 Personality Factors Test. Champaigne, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B., & Kline, P. (1977). The scientific analysis of personality and motivation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B., & Stice, G. F. (1957). The Sixteen Personality Factors Questionnaire. Champaigne, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B., & Warburton, F. W (1967). Objective personality and motivation tests. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerf, A. Z. (1947). Personality inventories. In J. P. Guilford (Ed.), Printed classification tests (Army Air Force Aviation Psychology Program Research Reports No. 5). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrey, A. L. (1970). EDITS manual for the Comrey Personality Scales. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom, W. G., Welsh, G. S., & Dahlstrom, L. E. (1975). An MMPI handbook. Volume II: Research applications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. D. (1955). Phrenology fad and science: A 19th century American crusade. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M., Takamoto-Chock, N. K. (1981). Factors in the natural language of personality: Re-analysis, comparison, and interpretation of six major studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, J. E. (1923). The will-temperament and its testing. New York: World Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, P. L. (1970). A history of psychological testing. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. L. (1961). Social desirability or acquiescence in the MMPI? A case study with the SD scale. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 351–359.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. L., & Heathers, L. B. (1962). The first factor of the MMPI: Social desirability or ego strength. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 26, 99–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1979). The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1983). The stability of confusion: A reply to Mischel & Peake. Psychological Review, 90, 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdberg, P., & Exner, J. E., Jr. (1984). Rorschach assessment. In G. Goldstein, & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment (pp. 332–347). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, J. E., Jr. (1983). The Exner report for the Rorschach Comprehensive System. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, J. E., Jr. (1986). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system, Volume 1: Basic foundations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, J. E., Jr. (1987). Computer assistance in Rorschach interpretation. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Computerized psychological assessment: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 218–235). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1970). The structure of human personality (3rd ed.). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual for the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, O. S. (1844). Synopsis of phrenology and the phrenological developments. Together with the character and talents of Charles A. Tufts. New York: Fowler & Wells Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, O. S., & Fowler, L. N. (1881). Self-instructor in phrenology and physiology; With over one-hundred engravings. New York: Fowler & Wells Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R. D. (1985). Landmarks in computerized assisted psychological interpretation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 748–759.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R. D. (1988, March). Future directions in personality assessment. Paper presented at the 23rd annual symposium on recent developments in the use of the MMPI, St. Petersburg Beach, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R. D., & Butcher, J. N. (1986). Critique of Matarazzo’s views on computerized testing: All sigma and no meaning. American Psychologist, 41, 94–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulkerson, S. C., Freud, S. L., & Raynor, G. H. (1958, February). The use of the MMPI in psychological evaluation of pilots. Aviation Medicine, pp. 122-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulkerson, S. C., & Sells, S. B. (1958). Adaptation of the MMPI for aeromedical practice norms for military pilots, USAF School of Aviation Medicine Reports, 58-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1879). Psychometric experiments. Brain, 2, 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1884). Measurement of character. Fortnightly Review, 42, 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist, C. R., & Boyd, S. T. (1980). Personality characteristics of Army helicopter pilots. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51, 253–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerathewohl, S. (1950). Psychological examinations for selection and training of fliers. In German aviation medicine in World War II (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: Department of the Air Force.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1965). Diagnosticians versus diagnostic signs: The diagnosis of psychosis versus neurosis from the MMPI. Psychological Monographs, 79 (Whole No. 602).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1971). A historical survey of personality scales and inventories. In P McReynolds (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 293–336). Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1972). Some recent trends in personality assessment. Journal of personality assessment, 36, 547–560.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141–165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goorney, A. B. (1970). MPI and MMPI scores, correlations and analysis for a military air crew population. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 164–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorham, D. R., Mosley, E. C., & Holtzman, W. H. (1968). Norms for the computer-scored Holtzman Inkblot Technique. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 26, 1279–1305.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P., & Lacey, J. I. (1947). In J. P. Guilford (Ed.), Printed classification tests (Army Air Force Aviation Psychology Program Report No. 5). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P., & Zimmerman, W. S. (1956). Fourteen dimensions of temperament. Psychological Monographs, 70 (Whole No. 417).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1926a). Testing the knowledge of right and wrong. Religious Education, 21, 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1926b). Testing the knowledge of right and wrong. Religious Education, 21, 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1926c). Testing the knowledge of right from wrong. Religious Education, 21, 413–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character: Vol. 1. Studies in deceit. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hase, H. D., & Goldberg, L. R. (1967). Comparative validity of different strategies of constructing personality inventory scales. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 231–248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, S. R. (1965). Personality inventories. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of clinical psychology (pp. 451–476). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidbreder, E. (1926). Measuring introversion and extroversion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 21, 120–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, M. R. (1970). Frequency tables for scoring Rorschach responses. Cleveland, OH: Western Reserve University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymans, G., & Wiersma, E. (1906). Beitrage zur spezillen psychologie auf grund einer massenunterschung. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie, 43, 81–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, A., & Amsden, G. S. (1913). A guide to the descriptive study of personality. Review of Neurology and Psychiatry, 11, 577–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman, W. H., Thorpe, J. S., Swartz, J. D., & Herron, E. W. (1961). Inkblot perception and personality—Holtzman Inkblot Technique. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N., & Messick, S. J. (1961). Acquiescence and desirability as response determinants of the MMPI. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 21, 771–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, L. S. (1948). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory; differentiation of psychologically good and poor combat risks among flying personnel. Journal of Aviation Medicine, 19, p. 222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1910). The associated method. American Journal of Psychology, 21, 219–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1918). Studies in word associations. London: William Heinermann (Medical Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G., & Riklin, F. (1918). The associations of normal subjects. In C. G. Jung (Ed.), Studies in word associations (pp. 6–20). London: William Heinermann (Medical Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsen, S., & O’Dell, J. W. (1975). A new automated interpretation system for the 16PE Journal of Personality Assessment, 39, 256–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsen, S., & O’Dell, J. W. (1987). Computer-based interpretation of the 16PF: The Karsen Clinical Report in contemporary practice. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Computerized psychological assessment: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 198–217). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, L. S., Butcher, J. N., & Slutske, W. S. (1990). Objective personality assessment. In G. Goldstein & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment (2nd ed., pp. 345-386). Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, B., Meyer, M. M., & Brawer, E (1970). Developments in the Rorschach technique, Vol. III. Aspects of personality structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, E. (1925). Physique and character. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriepe, K. (1950). Evaluation and procedure in the characterological selection of fliers. In German aviation medicine in World War II (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: Department of the Air Force.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachar, D. (1974). The MMPI: Clinical assessment and automated interpretation. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachar, D. (1987). Automated assessment of child and adolescent personality: The Personality Inventory for Children. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Computerized psychological assessment: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 261–291). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanyon, R. I., & Goodstein, L. D. (1971). Personality Assessment. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavater, J. C. (1804). Essays on physiognomy: For the promotion of knowledge and the love of mankind. London: Whittingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J., Wessler, R., & Redmore, C. (1970). Measuring ego development. Vol. 1: Construction and use of sentence completion test. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubin, B., Larsen, R. D., & Matarazzo, J. D. (1984). Patterns of psychological test usage in the United States: 1935-1982. American Psychologist, 39, 451–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lushene, R. E., O’Neil, H. F., & Dunn, T. (1974). Equivalent validity of a completely computerized MMPI. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 353–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarazzo, J. D. (1985). Clinical psychological test interpretation by computer: Hardware out paces software. Computers in Human behavior, 1, 235–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarazzo, J. D. (1986a). Computerized psychological test interpretation: Unvalidated plus all mean and no sigma. American Psychologist, 41, 14–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matarazzo, J. D. (1986b). Response to Fowler and Butcher on Matarazzo. American Psychologist, 41, 96.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, M. A., & Hartshorne, H. (1925). Objective methods of measuring character. Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 32, 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1986). Clinical assessment can benefit from recent advances in personality psychology American Psychologist, 41, 1001–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). More reasons to adopt the five-factor model. American Psychologist, 44, 451–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, J. C., Hathaway, S. R., & Meehl, P E. (1948). The Minnesota Multiphasic Inventory: I. The K scale. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 12, 20–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1956). Wanted—a good cookbook. American Psychologist, 11, 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1973). Psychodiagnosis: Selected papers. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P E. (1986). Causes and effects of my disturbing little book. Journal of personality assessment, 50, 370–375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E., & Hathaway, S. R. (1946). The K factor as a suppressor variable in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 525–564.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. J., & Jackson, D. N. (1961). Acquiescence and the factorial interpretation of the MMPI. Psychological Bulletin, 58, 299–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1843). System of logic, Book VI. London: Longmans Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1968). Personality assessment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1982). Beyond De Ja Vu in the search for cross-situational consistency. Psychological Review, 89, 730–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1983). Some facets of consistency: Replies to Epstein, Funder, and Bern. Psychological Review, 90, 394–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1943). Manual for the Thematic Apperception Test. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1962). Explorations in personality. New York: Science Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes. Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paton, S., McLake, W., & Hamilton, A. S. (1918). Personality studies and the personal equation of the aviator. Mental Hygiene, 2, 629–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, J. S., Swenson, W. M., Rome, H. P., Mataya, P., & Brannick, T. C. (1965). Development of a computer system for scoring and interpretation of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory in a medical setting. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 126, 682–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelles, G. (1918). Testing airmen’s nerves. Illustrated World, 1916–1917, 26, 279–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pete, J. C., Broughton, E. D., Hallman, L. K., & Letterman, N. L. (1974). Learning in two-person zero-sum games. Psychological Reports, 34, 503–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowski, Z. A. (1957). Perceptanalysis. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowski, Z. A. (1964). A digital computer interpretation of inkblot test data. Psychiatric Quarterly, 38, 1–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, F. H. (1927). Personality study of candidates for flying. Military Surgeon, 62, 477–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, S. L. (1921). A group scale for investigating the emotions. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 16, 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., & Mowshowitz, A. (1966). Experimental studies of stochastic models for the prisoner’s dilemma. Behavioral Science, 11, 444–458.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, D., Gill, M., & Schafer, R. (1968). Diagnostic psychological testing. New York: International University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiffert, J. B. (1922). Psychotechnik im heere, Report on the VII Kongress für experimentelle Psychologie, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (in press). Fitting the two-parameter model to personality data: The parameterization of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Applied Psychological Measurement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roback, A. A. (1928). The psychology of character. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roback, A. A. (1934). Persoanalysis: A study in method. Character and Personality, 3, 144–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rome, H. P., Swenson, W. M., Mataya, P., McCarthy, C. E., Pearson, J. S., Keating, F. B., & Hathaway, S. R. (1962). Symposium on automated techniques in personality assessment. Proceedings of the Staff Meetings of the Mayo Clinic, 37, 61–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rorschach, H. (1921). Psychodiagnostik. Bern: Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (Whole No. 609).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapinkopf, R. C. (1977). A computer adaptive testing approach to the measurement of personality variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, J. (1966). Measurement and prediction, clinical and statistical. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 178–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, W. H. (1940). The varieties of human physique: An introduction to constitutional psychology. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, W. H. (1942). The varieties of temperament: A psychology of constitutional differences. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, W. H. (1944). Constitutional factors in personality. In J. M. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders (pp. 526–549). New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, R. (1968). Personality and strategy choice. Journal of Psychology, 70, 191–197.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skavran, R. (1940). Die psychologie des Jagdfliegers. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. S. (1968). The computer and the TAT. Journal of School Psychology, 6, 206–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, H. G., & Yakovlev, P. I. (1944). Manual of military psychiatry. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Space, L. G. (1981). The computer vs. psychometrician. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 13, 595–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A. (1985). Structure of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 681–706). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A. (1989). Development of MMPI-2 uniform T-scores. Presented at the 97th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (1987, August). Re-examining basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors. Paper presented at the 95th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1930). A neurotic inventory. Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 3030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, R. C. (1925). The measurement of fundamental character traits by a new diagnostic test. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 18, 400–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent factors based on trait ratings (USAF ASD Technical Report No. 61-97). Lackland Air Force Base, TX: U.S. Air Force.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Army. (1948). Army Air Force aviation program research reports (No. 1-19). Washington, DC: US. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldman, D. J. (1967). Computer-based sentence completion interviews. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 14, 153–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M. M. (1987). Man-made minds. New York: Walker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, N. G. (1989). The effect of inapplicable item responses on the structure of behavioral checklist data: A cautionary note. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, N. G., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1987). Is it time for clinical psychology to embrace the five-factor model of personality? American Psychologist, 42, 887–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, N. G., & Reise, S. P. (in press). Computerized adaptive personality assessment: An illustration with the absorption scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. A. (1978). Review of the 16PF In O. K. Buros (Ed.), Eighth mental measurement yearbook. Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, R. (1934). Ansatzezu einer psychologie des kraftfahrens un fliegens, Soldatentum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G. B. (1932). Character tests and their application through 1930. Review of Educational Research, 2, 185–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D. J. (1985). Adaptive testing by computer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 774–789.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, F. L. (1914). The systematic observation of the personality—in its relation to the hygiene of the mind. Psychological Review, 21, 295–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, F. L. (1927). Mental tests in clinical practice. New York: World Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, S. R. (1866). New physiognomy or, signs of character. New York: Fowler & Wells Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. S. (1920). Personal data sheet. Chicago, IL: Stoeling.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ben-Porath, Y.S., Butcher, J.N. (1991). The Historical Development of Personality Assessment. In: Walker, C.E. (eds) Clinical Psychology. Applied Clinical Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9715-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9715-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9717-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9715-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics