Language Disorders

  • David Caplan
Part of the Critical Issues in Neuropsychology book series (CINP)

Abstract

Human language is a unique mental entity. It is a system of symbols that greatly enhances the ability of humans to represent aspects of the world, to think, and to communicate with each other. Language has a complex structure, and its use involves many diverse, interacting psychological operations. This chapter describes the progress that has been made in understanding language processing and its disorders, and presents an approach to the diagnosis of the most common of these disorders in acquired neurological disease in adults.

Keywords

Lexical Decision Syntactic Structure Complex Word Word Production Language Disorder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert, M. L., & Bear, D. (1974). Time to understand: A case study of word deafness with reference to the role of time in auditory comprehension. Brain, 97, 373–384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, S. R. (1982). Where’s morphology? Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 571–612.Google Scholar
  3. Auerbach, S. H., Allard, T., Naeser, M., Alexander, M. P., & Albert, M. L. (1982). Pure word deafness: Analysis of a case with bilateral lesions and a defect at the pre-phonemic level. Brain, 105, 271–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1987). The analysis of morphological errors in a case of acquired dyslexia. Brain and Language, 32, 278–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (in press). Morphological composition in the lexical output system. Cognitive Neuropsychologv.Google Scholar
  6. Basso, A., Casati, G., & Vignolo, L. A. (1977). Phonemic identification defect in aphasia. Cortex, 13, 85–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Beauvois, M.-F. (1982). Optic aphasia: A process of interaction between vision and language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 298, 35–47.Google Scholar
  8. Beauvois, M.-F., Saillant, B., Meininger, V., & Lhermitte, F. (1978). Bilateral tactile aphasia: A tactoverbal dysfunction. Brain, 101, 381–401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Berndt, R. S., & Mitchum, C. C. (1990). Auditory and lexical information sources in immediate recall: Evidence from a patient with a deficit to the phonological short-term store. In G. Vallar & T. Shallice (Eds.), Neuropsvchological impairments of short-term memory (pp. 115–144 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Blumstein, S., Alexander, M. P., Ryalls, J. H., Katz, W., & Dworetzky, B. (1987). On the nature of the foreign accent syndrome: A case study. Brain and Language, 31, 215–244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Blumstein, S. E., Baker, E., & Goodglass, H. (1977). Phonological factors in auditory comprehension in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 15, 19–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Blumstein, S., Cooper, W. E., Zurif, E. B., & Caramazza, A. (1977). The perception and production of voice-onset time in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 15, 371–383.Google Scholar
  13. Bowman, C. A., Hodson, B. W., & Simpson, R. K. (1980). Oral apraxia and aphasic misarticulation. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology. Minneapolis: B.R.K. Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Bub, D., Black, S., Hampson, E., & Kertesz, A. (1988). Semantic encoding of pictures and words: Some neuropsychological observations. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 27–66.Google Scholar
  15. Bub, D., Black, S.. Howell, J., & Kertesz, A. (1987). Speech output processes and reading. In M. Coltheart, G. Sartori, & R. Job (Eds.), The cognitive neuropsychology of language (pp. 79110 ). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Buckingham, H. W. (1979). Linguistic aspects of lexical retrieval disturbances in the posterior fluent aphasias. in H. Whitaker & H. Whitaker (Eds.), Studies in neurolinguistics (Vol. 4 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Buckingham, H. W., & Kertesz, A. (1976). Neologistic jargon aphasia. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeit-linger.Google Scholar
  18. Butterworth, B. (1982). Speech errors: Old data in search of new theories. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Slips of the tongue in language production (pp. 73–108 ). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  19. Butterworth, B. L. (1985). Jargon aphasia: Processes and strategies. In S. Newman & R. Epstein (Eds.), Current perspectives in dysphasia. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
  20. Butterworth, B., Campbell, R., & Howard, D. (1986). The uses of short-term memory: A case study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 705–737.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Butterworth, B., & Howard D. (1987). Paragrammatisms. Cognition, 26, 1–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Caplan, D. (1986). In defense of agrammatism. Cognition, 24, 263–276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Caplan. D., Baker, C.. & Dehaut, F. (1985). Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia. Cognition, 21, 117–175.Google Scholar
  24. Caplan, D., & Hilderbrandt, N. (1988). Disorders of syntactic comprehension. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  25. Caplan, D., Kellar, L., & Locke, S. (1972). Inflection of neologisms in aphasia. Brain, 95, 169–172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Caplan, D., Vanier, M., & Baker, C. (1986). A case study of reproduction conduction aphasia: I. Word production. Cognitive Neurop.svchologv, 3 (1), 99–128.Google Scholar
  27. Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1990). Short-term memory and language comprehension: A critical review of the neuropsychological literature. In G. Vallar & ‘l’. Shallice (Eds.), Neurop.svchologieal impairments of short-term memory (pp. 337–389 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Caramazza, A., Berndt, R. S., & Basili, A. G. (1983). The selective impairment of phonological processing: A case study. Brain and Language, 18, 128–174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., & Villa, G. (1986). The role of the (output) phonological buffer in reading, writing and repetition. Cognitive Neuropsychologv. 3, 37–76.Google Scholar
  30. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Chomsky, N. (198I). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: toris.Google Scholar
  32. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  33. Coltheart, M., Patterson, J., & Marshall, J. C. (1980). Deep dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  34. Danly, M., Cooper, W., & Shapiro, B. (1983). Fundamental frequency, language processing. and linguistic structure in Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 19, 1–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Danly, M., & Shapiro, B. (1982). Speech prosody in Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language. 16, 17 1190.Google Scholar
  36. Darley, F. L. (1983). Foreword. In W. R. Berry (Ed.), Clinical dvsarthria. San Diego: College Hill Press.Google Scholar
  37. Denes, G., & Semenza, C. (1975). Auditory modality-specific anomia: Evidence from a case of pure word deafness. Cortex, 11, 401–411.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. De Renzi, E.. & Vignolo, L. A. (1962). The Token Test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain, 85. 665–678.Google Scholar
  39. Dunn, L. M. (1965). Expanded manual for the Peabody Picture Vocabulary “lest. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  40. Ellis, A., Miller, D., & Sin, G. (1983). Wernicke’s aphasia and normal language processing: A case study in cognitive neuropsychology. Cognition, 15. III - 144.Google Scholar
  41. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Funnell, E. (1983). Ideographic communication and word class elects in aphasia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Reading, England.Google Scholar
  43. Garrett, M. F. (1982). Production of speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 19–75 ). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Goodglass, H., & Geschwind, N. (1976). Language disorders (aphasia). In E. C. Carterette & M. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  45. Goodglass, H., Gleason, J. B., & Hyde, M. R. (1970). Sonic dimensions of auditory language comprehension in aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13. 595–606.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1972). Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination booklet. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders (80 pages). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
  47. Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders ( 2nd ed. ). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
  48. Goodglass, H., & Menn. L. (1985). Is agrammatism a unitary phenomenon? In M. L. Kean (Ed.). Agrammatism (pp. I - 26 ). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  49. Grodzinsky, Y. (1984). The syntactic characterization of agrammatism. Cognition, 16, 99–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Grosz, B. J., Pollack, M. E., & Sidncr, C. L. (1989). Discourse. In M. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 437–468 ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  51. Halle, M., & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Heeschen, C. (1985). Agrammatism vs. paragrammatism: A fictitious opposition. In M.-L. Kean (Ed.), Agrammatism (pp. 207–248 ). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  53. Henderson, L. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  54. Hillis, A., Rapp, B., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1990). Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing. Cognitive Neurop.sychologv, 7, 191–243.Google Scholar
  55. Howard, D., & Orchard-Lisle, V. (1984). On the origin of semantic errors in naming: Evidence from the case of a global aphasic. Cognitive Neuropsvchology, 1, 163–190.Google Scholar
  56. Itoh, S., Sasanuma, S., & Hirose, H. (1980). Abnormal articulatory dynamics in a patient with apraxia of speech: X-ray microbeam observation. Brain and Language, 11, 66–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Itoh, M. Sasanuma, S., Tatsumi, I. F., Murakami, S., Fukusako, Y., & Suzuki, T. (1982). Voice onset time characteristics in apraxia of speech. Brain and Language, 17, 193–210.Google Scholar
  58. Joanette, Y., Keller, E., & Lecours, A.-R. (1980). Sequence of phonemic approximations in aphasia. Brain and Language, 11, 30–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Job, R., & Sartori, G. (1984). Morphological decomposition: Evidence from crossed phonological dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 435–458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.Google Scholar
  61. Kean, M.-L. (1977). The linguistic interpretation of aphasic syndromes: Agrammatism in Broca’s aphasia, an example. Cognition, 5, 9–46.Google Scholar
  62. Kent, R., & Rosenhek, J. (1982). Prosodic disturbance and neurological lesion. Brain and Language, 15, 259–291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Kertesz, A. (1979). Aphasia and associated disorders: Taxonomy, localization and recovers. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  64. Kertesz, A., & Poole, E. (1974). The aphasia quotient: The taxonomic approach to measurement of aphasic disability. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 1, 7–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Kohn, S. E. (1984). The nature of the phonological disorder in conduction aphasia. Brain and Language, 23, 97–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Kohn, S. (1989). The nature of the phonemic string deficit in conduction aphasia. Aphasiologv, 3 (3), 209–239.Google Scholar
  67. Lapointe, S. (1983). Sonic issues in the linguistic description of agrammatism. Cognition, 14,1–39. Lecours, A. R., & Lhermitte, F. (1969). Phonemic paraphasias: Linguistic structures and tentative hypotheses. Cortex. 5,193–228.Google Scholar
  68. Lecours, A. R., & Rouillon, F. (1976). Neurolinguistic analysis of jargon aphasia and jargon agraphia. In H. Whitaker & H. Whitaker (Eds.), Studies in neurolinguistics (Vol. 2 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  69. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. Lhermitte, F., & Beauvois, M.-F. (1973). A visual-speech disconnexion syndrome: Report of a case with optic-aphasia, agnosic alexia and colour agnosia. Brain, 96, 695–714.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  72. Marshall, J. C. (1987). Routes and representations in the processing of written language. In E. Keller amp; M. Gopnik (Eds.). Motor and sensory processes of language (pp. 237–256 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbauni.Google Scholar
  73. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Marslen-Wilson. W. D.. & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29–63.Google Scholar
  75. McCarthy, R. A.. & Warrington. E. K. (1984). A two-route model of speech productcion: Evidence from aphasia. Brain, 107, 463–48. 5.Google Scholar
  76. McCarthy, R., & Warrington, E. K. (1985). Category specificity in an agrammatic patient: The relative impairment of verb retrieval and comprehension. Neurops_vchologia, 23, 709–727.Google Scholar
  77. McCarthy, R.. & Warrington. E. K. (1987). Understanding: A function of short-term memory? Brain, 110, 1565–1578.Google Scholar
  78. Menn, L., Obler, L., & Goodglass, H. (1990). A cross-language study of agrammatism. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  79. Micelli. G., & Caramazza, A. (1988). Dissociation of inflectional and derivational morphology. Brain and Language, 35, 24–65.Google Scholar
  80. Miceli, G.. Gainotti, G., Caltagirone, C., & Masullo, C. (1980). Some aspects of phonological impairment in aphasia. Brain and Language, 11, 159–169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Variation in the pattern of omissions and substitutions of grammatical morphemes in the spontaneous speech of so-called agrammatic patients. Brain and Language, 36, 447–492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Miceli, G., Silveri, M., Villa, G., & Caramazza, A. (1984). On the basis for the agrammatic’s difficulty in producing main verbs. Cortex, 20, 207–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Miller, D., & Ellis, A. W. (1987). Speech and writing errors in “neologistic jargonaphasia”: A lexical activation hypothesis. In M. Coltheart, G. Sartori, & R. Job (Eds.), The cognitive neuropsychology of language. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  84. Monrad Krohn, G. H. (1947). Prosody or altered “melody of language.” Brain, 70, 405–423.Google Scholar
  85. Morton, J. (1980). Two auditory parallels to deep dyslexia. In M. Coltheart. K. Patterson, amp; J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 189–197 ). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  86. Nespoulous, J. L., Joanette, Y., Beland, R., Caplan, I)., & Lecours, A. R. (1984). Phonological disturbances in aphasia: Is there a “markedness” effect in aphasic phonemic errors? In F. C. Rose (Ed.), Progress in aphasiology: Advances in neurology. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
  87. Ostrin, R., & Schwartz, M. F. (1986). Reconstructing from a degraded trace: A study of sentence repetition in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 28, 328–345.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Ostrin, R. K., Schwartz, M. F., & Saffrin, E. M. (1983). The influence of syntactic complexity in the elicited production of agrammatic aphasics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Aphasia, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  89. Pate, D. S., Saffran, E. M., & Martin, N. (1987). Specifying the nature of the production impairment in a conduction aphasic: A case study. Language and Cognitive Processes. 2(1), 43–84.Google Scholar
  90. Patterson, K. E. (1980). Derivational errors. In M. Coltheart, K. E. Patterson, &.1. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 286–306 ). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  91. Porch, B. E. (1971). The Porch Index of Communicative Ability: Administration. scoring and interpretation. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  92. Ross, E., & Mesulam, M. (1979). Dominant language functions of the right hemisphere? Prosody and emotional gesturing. Archives of Neurology, 36, 144–148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Ryalls, J. H. (1982). Note. Intonation in Broca’s aphasia. Neuropsychologia. 20 (3), 355–360.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Saffran, E. M., Marin. O., & Yeni-Komshian, G. (1976). An analysis of speech perception and word deafness. Brain and Language, 3. 209–228.Google Scholar
  95. Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F., & Marin, O. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism II: Production. Brain and Language, 10, 263–280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Sartori, G., & Job, R. (1988). The oyster with four legs: A neuropsychological study on the interaction of visual and semantic information. Cognitive Neurops, ychologv, 5. 105–132.Google Scholar
  97. Schonle, T. W., Grabe, K., Wenig, P., Hohne, J., Schrader, J., & Conrad, B. (1987). Electromagnetic articulography: Use of alternating magnetic fields for tracking movements of multiple points inside and outside the vocal tract. Brain and Language, 31. 26–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Schwartz, M. F., Marin. O. S. M., & Saffran. E. M. (1979). Dissociations of language function in dementia: A case study. Brain: and Langaugc, 7. 277–306.Google Scholar
  99. Schwartz, M., Saffran, E., & Marin, O. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism I: Comprehension. Brain and Language, 10, 249–262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Shapiro, B., & Danly, M. (1985). The role of the right hemisphere in the control of speech prosody in propositional and effective context. Brain and Language, 25, 19–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Silveri, M. C., & Gainotti, G. B. (1988). Interaction between vision and language in category specific semantic impairment for living things. Cognitive Ncuropsvchology, 5, 677–709.Google Scholar
  102. Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. T. A. W. Donaldson (Ed.), Organization of memory (pp. 381–403 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  103. Tyler, L. K., & Cobb. H. (1987). Processing bound grammatical morphemes in context: The case of an aphasic patient. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2 (3/4), 245–262.Google Scholar
  104. Tyler, L., & Wessels, J. (1983). Quantifying contextual contributions to word-recognition processes. Perception and Psychoph sic.s, 34, 409–420.Google Scholar
  105. Warrington, E. K. (1975). The selective impairment of semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 635–657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Warrington, E. K. (1981). Neuropsychological studies of verbal semantic systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B295, 411–423.Google Scholar
  107. Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1983). Category specific access dysphasia. Brain, 106, 859–878. Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1987). Categories of knowledge: Further fractionation and an attempted integration. Brain, 110, 1273–1296.Google Scholar
  108. Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107, 829–853.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Waters, G. S., Caplan, D., & Hilderbrandt, N. (1991). On the structure of verbal short-term memory and its functional role in sentence comprehension: Evidence from neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 81–126.Google Scholar
  110. Wepman, J. M. (1958). Auditory Discrimination Test. Chicago, IL: Language Research Associates.Google Scholar
  111. Wernicke, C. (1974). The aphasic symptom complex: A psychological study on a neurological basis. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 4, 34–97.Google Scholar
  112. Williams, E. (1981). X features. In S. Tavakolian (Ed.), Language acquisition and linguistic theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  113. Zingeser, L. B., & Berndt, R. S. (1988). Grammatical class and context effects in a case of pure anomia: Implications for models of lexical processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4, 473–516.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Caplan
    • 1
  1. 1.Neuropsychology LaboratoryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations