Evaluating the Utmck PET Center: An Organizational and Financial Analysis

  • Jeff Collmann
  • Sam Stapleton
  • Susan Reed

Abstract

The introduction of new medical technologies into clinical practice is coming under increasingly close scrutiny because of broad societal demand to reduce medical costs. Information about the experience of sites that attempt clinically to implement technologies such as Positron Emission Tomography is therefore important to the debate about national healthcare policy even if the data may be generalized only within strict limitations (Hubner 1992; Kessler, Manning and Votaw, n.d; Coleman, Hoffman, Hanson, Need and Harris, n.d; Harris, n.d.). The University of Tennesse Medical Center at Knoxville (UTMCK) has provided clinical service to almost 3,000 patients since opening its doors in January 1988. In contrast to all of its predecessors who provided clinical service as a byproduct of research missions, the UTMCK PET Center was established as a clinical site. Its mission was to demonstrate that clinical PET was technically feasible, clinically useful and financially viable in the long run. This paper reports on UTMCK's relative sucess in fulfilling its mission.

Keywords

Research Mission Medicare Reimbursement Clinical Positron Emission Tomography Brain Tumor Case National Healthcare Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. APM, Inc. “P.E.T. Center Feasibility Study”, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
  2. Coleman, R. Edward, Hoffman, JM, Hanson, MW, Need, JL and Harris, C, “Two Years of Clinical PET Experience at Duke University”, unpublished manuscript, n.d.Google Scholar
  3. Goodman, Mark M, “Automated Synthesis of Radiotracers for PET Applications” in Hubner Karl F., Collmann, J, Buonocore, E, and Kabalka, G, Clinical Positron Emission Tomography. St. Louis, Mosby Year Book, 1992, pp 110–122f.Google Scholar
  4. Harris, Craig, “PET Site Planning”, unpublished manuscript, n.d.Google Scholar
  5. Hubner, Karl F, “University of Tennessee Biomedical Imaging Center and the Transfer of Technology to the Clinical Floor”, in Hubner Karl F., Collmann, J, Buonocore, E, and Kabalka, G Clinical Positron Emission Tomography.St. Louis, Mosby Year Book, 1992, pp 4–16.Google Scholar
  6. Hubner Karl F., Collmann, J, Buonocore, E, and Kabalka, G, Clinical Positron Emission Tomography. St. Louis, Mosby Year Book, 1992Google Scholar
  7. Kessler, RM, Manning, RG, and Votaw, JR, “Positron Tomography at Vanderbilt: Initial Experiences”, unpublished manuscript, n.d.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeff Collmann
    • 1
  • Sam Stapleton
    • 2
  • Susan Reed
    • 2
  1. 1.Georgetown University HospitalUSA
  2. 2.University of Tennessee Medical CenterKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations