Influence of Androstenol and Androsterone on the Evalulation of Men of Varying Attractiveness Levels

  • R. E. Maiworm
  • W. U. Langthaler

Abstract

The components of human axillary secretions, especially odoriferous steroids, may take part in human olfactory communication in a manner analogous to the odours from specialized skin glands in animals (Labows et al., 1982). Filsinger & Fabes (1985), for expample, suggest that some of them (especially androstenol, androstenone) may be putative human pheromones. With regard to androstenol and androstenone, evidence has been found for a connection between these odoriferous substances and the covert or open behavior of the receivers (e.g., assessment of person, self-ratings, choice of locations: cf. Kirk-Smith, 1978; Filsinger & Fabes, 1985; Benton & Wastell, 1986). However, it has not been shown that such substances function as human pheromones and induce a definite behavior or physiological response.

Keywords

Menstrual Cycle Menstrual Cycle Phase Odoriferous Substance Skin Gland Adjusted Alpha Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benton, D., and Wastell, V., 1986, Effects of androstenol on human sexual arousal, Biological Psychology, 22: 141–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Filsinger, E.E., Braun, J.J., and Monte, W.C., 1985, An examination of the effects of putative pheromones on human judgements, Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Filsinger, E.E. and Fabes, R.A., 1985, Odor communication, pheromones and human families, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 3 49–359.Google Scholar
  4. Gustayson, A.R., Dawson, ME., and Bonnet, D.G., 1987, Androstenol, a putative human pheromone, affects human ( Homo sapiens) male choice performance. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 101, 210–212.Google Scholar
  5. Jahnke, W., and Debus, G., 1978, Die Eigenschaftsworterliste. EWL. Hogrefe. Gottingen.Google Scholar
  6. Kaufmann, F.R., Stancyk, F.Z., and Gen:zschein, E, 1990, DHT and DHTS metabolism in human genital skin. Ferility and Sterility, 54, 251–254.Google Scholar
  7. Kirk-Smith, M., Booth, D.A., Caroll, D., and Davies, P., 1978, Human social attitudes affected by androstenol. Research Communications in Psychology, Psychiatry and Behavior, 3, 379–384.Google Scholar
  8. Kloek, J., 1961, The smell of some sex-hormones and their metabolites. Reflections and experiments concerning the significance of smell for the mutual relation of the sexes. Psychiatria, Neurologia, Neurochirurgia, 64, 106–344.Google Scholar
  9. Labows, J.N., Preti, G., Hoelzle, E., Leyden, J., and Kligman, A., 1979, Steriod analysis of human apocrinc: secretion. Steriods, 34, 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Labows, J.N., McGinley, K.J., and Kligman, A., 1982, Perspectives on axillary odor. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists., 34, 193–202.Google Scholar
  11. Maiworm, R.E. & Langthaler, 1990, Influences of androstenol, androsterone, menstrual cycle andoral contraceptives on the attractivity ratings of female probands. Ninth Congress of the ECGO. The Netherlands, 2–7. 9, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. Sharp, F., Hay, J.B., Hodgins, M.B., 1976, Journal of Endocrinology, 70, 491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Toth, I., and Faredin, L., 1983, Steriods excreted by human skin. Acta Medica Hungaria, 40, 139–145.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. E. Maiworm
    • 1
  • W. U. Langthaler
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Olshausenstr. 40/60KielGermany
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MunsterMunsterGermany

Personalised recommendations