Trauma Communication in Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus)

  • Mehrnaz Jamzadeh


Among the animals that are adapted to limited light are the catfishes. The North American channel catfish, which was used as the subject of this investigation, is an ostariophysan. These fishes are known to possess club cells, and most members produce alarm substance (Frisch 1938, 1941, Pfeiffer 1977). Limitation of visual communication indicated by the catfish’s habitat and specific anatomical features of the channel catfish, such as the presence of chemosensory cells covering the body and a high concentration of these cells on parts of the body such as the barbels, is presumably the result of favored selection for this method of communication (Todd 1971). Catfishes are capable of producing and recognizing individual specific pheromones. Through these pheromones a bullhead catfish, I. nebulosus can identify not only the species and sex of a conspecific, but also its age or size, reproductive state, and hierarchical social status (Lowe-McCannell 1975).


Channel Catfish Chemical Communication Body Odor Skin Mucus Club Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anthony, M. 1964. Utilization of selected forage organisms by channel catfish. Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.Google Scholar
  2. Bardach, J.E., Todd, J.H., and Cricketer, R. 1967. Orientation by taste in fish of the genus Ictalurus. Science 155: 1267–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, G.W. 1962. Management of artificial lakes and ponds. Reinhold Publishing Corporation, Chapman and Hall, Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  4. Bradley, G., Rehnberg, B.G. and Smith, R.J.F. 1990. Behavioral and physiological responses to alarm pheromone by ostariophysan fishes and a possible modulating role for brain benzodiazepine receptors. In: Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 5, (ed. D. MacDonald, D. Muller-Schwarze, and S. Natynczuk ), pp. 132–138. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant, B., Elgin, R., and Atema J. 1978. Chemical communication in catfish: stress-induced changes in body odor. Biol. Bull 155:429.Google Scholar
  6. Bryant, B.P. and Atema, J. 1987. Diet manipulation affects social behavior of catfish: importance of body odor. J. Chem. Ecol. 13:1645–1661.Google Scholar
  7. Frisch, K.von. 1938. Zur Psychologie des Fisch-Schwarmes. Naturwissenscaften 26: 601–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frisch, K.von. 1941. Uber einen Schreckstoff der Fischhaut und seine biologische Bedeutung. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 29:44–145.Google Scholar
  9. Jamzadeh, M. 1991. Communication and information signals. (In preparation)Google Scholar
  10. Johnsen, B., and Teeter, J.H. 1980. Spatial gradient of chemical cues by catfish. J. Comp. Physiol. 140:95–99.Google Scholar
  11. Lowe-McCannel, R.A. 1975. Fish communities in tropical fresh water. Longman, London.Google Scholar
  12. Pfeiffer, W.D. 1977. The distribution of fright reaction and alarm substance cells in fishes. Copeía 1977, 653–665.Google Scholar
  13. Prather, E.E. 1959. The use of channel catfish as sport fish. Proc. 13th Ann. Conf. S.E. Assoc. Game and Fish Comm., 331–335.Google Scholar
  14. Todd, J.H. 1971. The chemical languages of fishes. Sci. Amer.,224(5):98–108.Google Scholar
  15. Todd, J.H., Atema, J., and Bardach, J.E. 1967. Chemical communication in the social behavior of a fish, the yellow bullhead, Ictalurus natalis. Science, 158: 672–673.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehrnaz Jamzadeh
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentBenedict CollegeColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations