Action of Sucrose on the Salty Taste Response

  • Keiichi Tonosaki

Abstract

Taste stimulus adsorption is believed to occur at the taste cell microvillous membrane (Beidler, 1954; Beidler and Tonosaki, 1985). However, little is known about the mechanisms of taste transduction, due mainly to technical difficulties of inserting glass electrodes into mammalian taste cells (Tonosaki and Funakoshi, 1984,1988). We previously reported that the mouse taste cell response to sucrose is a membrane depolarization accompanied by an increase in membrane resistance. The sucrose response increases in amplitude as the membrane is depolarized and decreases in amplitude as the membrane is hyperpolarized. The same taste cell responds to NaCl with membrane depolarization accompanied by a decrease in membrane resistance. The NaCl response increases in amplitude as the membrane is hyperpolarized and decreases in amplitude as the membrane is depolarized. These results suggest that sucrose and NaCl have quite different response generation mechanisms (Tonosaki and Funakoshi, 1988; Tonosaki, 1988).

Keywords

Membrane Depolarization Taste Receptor Membrane Resistance Taste Cell Taste Stimulus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartoshuk, L.M., Murphy, C. and Cleveland, C.T., 1978, Sweet taste of dilute NaCl: Psychophysical evidence for a sweet stimulus, Physiol. Behay., 21: 609–613.Google Scholar
  2. Beidler, L.M., 1954, A theory of taste stimulation, J. Gen. Physiol., 38: 133–139.Google Scholar
  3. Beidler, L.M. and Tonosaki, K., 1985, Multiple sweet receptor sites and taste theory, in: “Taste, Olfaction and the Central Nervous System.”, D.W. Pfaff, ed., Rockefeller University Press, New York, pp. 47–64.Google Scholar
  4. Gilian, D.J., 1982, Mixture suppression: The effect of spatial separation between sucrose and NaC1, Percept. Psychophys., 32: 504–510.Google Scholar
  5. Kroeze, J.H.A., 1978, The taste of sodium chloride: Masking and adaptation, Chem. Senses Flavour, 3: 443–449.Google Scholar
  6. Kroeze, J.H.A., 1979, Masking and adaptation of sugar sweetness intensity, Physiol. Behay., 22: 347–351.Google Scholar
  7. Lawless, H., 1982, Adapting efficiency of salt-sucrose mixtures, Percept. Psychophys., 32: 410–422.Google Scholar
  8. Tonosaki, K., 1988, Generation mechanisms of mouse taste cell responses. In: “The Beidler Symposium on Taste and Smell”., I.J. Miller, Jr., ed., Book Service Associates, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A., pp. 93–102.Google Scholar
  9. Tonosaki, K. and Funakoshi, M., 1984, Effect of polarization of mouse taste cells, Chem. Senses, 9: 381–387.Google Scholar
  10. Tonosaki, K. and Funakoshi, M., 1988, Cyclic nucleotides may mediate taste transduction, Nature (Lond), 331: 354–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tonosaki, K. and Funakoshi, M., 1989, Cross-adapted sugar responses in the mouse taste cell, Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 92A: 181–183.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keiichi Tonosaki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Oral PhysiologySchool of Dentistry Asahi UniversityHozumi-cho, Motosu-gun GifuJapan

Personalised recommendations