Experimental Modulation of Behavior of Free-Ranging Mammals by Semiochemicals

  • Dietland Müller-Schwarze


This paper reviews the mammalian species and behavioral contexts for which we know the role of behavior-modulating conspecific chemicals (=pheromones) well enough to be able to change the behavior of freely moving single individuals consistently and predictably in their natural physical and social environment.


Scent Mark Predator Odor Control Odor Castor Canadensis Conspecific Odor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boonstra, R. and Krebs, C. J., 1976, The effect of odour on trap response in Microtus townsendii, J. Zool. (Lond.), 180:467.Google Scholar
  2. Daly, M., Wilson, M. I., and Faux, S. F., 1978, Seasonally variable effects of conspecific odors upon capture of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus gambelii), Behay. Biol. 23:254.Google Scholar
  3. Daly, M., Wilson, M.I., and Behrends, P., 1980, Factors affecting rodents’ responses to odours of strangers encountered in the field: experiments with odour-baited traps, Behay. Ecol. Sociobiol. 6:323.Google Scholar
  4. Fan, Z., 1978, The use of sexual attractant pheromones in controlling Brandt’s voles, Acta Zool. Sin. 24:366.Google Scholar
  5. Fan, Z., Hao, S., Liang, Y., Wang, M., and Zhao, Y., 1981, Chemical signals and their role in social groups of two voles (Lagurus luteus and Lagurus lagurus), Acta Ecol. Sin.,1:66.Google Scholar
  6. Hansson, L., 1967, Index line catches as a basis for population studies on small mammals, Oikos 18: 261.Google Scholar
  7. Hodgdon, H. E., 1978, Social dynamics and behavior within an unexploited beaver (Castor canadensis) population. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Massachusetts, Amherst, 292 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Humphrey, S. R., and Zinn, T. L., 1982, Seasonal habitat use by river otters and Everglades mink in Florida, J. Wildl. Manage., 46:375.Google Scholar
  9. Mazdzer, E., Capone, M. R., and Drickamer, L. C., 1976, Conspecific odors and trappability of deer mice (Peromyscus leucopus noveboracensis), J. Mammal. 57:607.Google Scholar
  10. Müller-Schwarze, D., 1971, Pheromones in black-tailed deer (Odocoil- Google Scholar
  11. eus hemionus columbianus) Anim. Behay., 19:141. Müller-Schwarze, D., 1974, Application of pheromones in mammals, in: “Pheromones,” M. C. Birch, ed., North Holland/American Elsevier, Amsterdam, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Müller-Schwarze, D., 1980, Chemical signals in alarm behavior of deer, in: “Chemical Signals,” D. Muller-Schwarze and R.M. Silverstein, eds., Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Müller-Schwarze, D., and Heckman, S., 1980, The social role of scent marks in beaver, Castor canadensis, J. Chem. Ecol. 6:81.Google Scholar
  14. Müller-Schwarze, D., Heckman, S., and Stagge, B., 1982, Responses of free-living beaver to experimental scent marks, Proc. FirstGoogle Scholar
  15. Worldwide Beaver Symp. Helsinki, Aug. 1982, in press. Müller-Schwarze, D., and Altieri, R., in prep., An alert odor in black-tailed deer, Odocoileus hemionus columbianus. Google Scholar
  16. Ritter, F., Bruggemann, I., Gut, J., Persoon, S. C. J., and VerweilGoogle Scholar
  17. P., 1982, Chemical stimuli of the muskrat, in: “The Determination of Behaviour by Chemical Stimuli,” Proc. 5th ECRO Minisymp. Jerusalem, Israel, Nov. 1981.Google Scholar
  18. Rowe, F. P., 1970, The response of wild mice (Mus musculus) to live trans marked by their own and foreign mouse, Odor J. Zool. (Loud.), 162: 517.Google Scholar
  19. Shumake, S. A., 1977, The search for applications of chemical signals in wildlife management, in: “Chemical Signals in Vertebrates,” D. Muller-Schwarze and M. M. Mozell, eds., Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Stoddart, D. M., 1980, Some responses of a free living community of rodents to the odors of predators, in: “Chemical Signals,” D. Muller-Schwarze and R.M. Silverstein, eds., Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Summerlin, C. T., and Wolfe, J. L., 1973, Social influences on trap response of the cottonrat, Sigmodon hispidus Ecology, 54: 1156.Google Scholar
  22. Whitten, W. K., Wilson, M. C., Wilson, S. R., Jorgenson, J. W., Novotny, M., and Carmack, M., 1980, Induction of marking behavior in wild red foxes (Vulpes vulpes L.) by synthetic urinary constituents, J. Chem. Ecol. 6:49.Google Scholar
  23. Williams, R. M., 1951, The use of scent in live-trapping muskrats, J. Wildl. Mgt. 15:117.Google Scholar
  24. Wuensch, K. L., 1982, Effect of scented traps on captures of Mus musculus and Peromyscus maniculatus, J. Mammal. 63:312.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dietland Müller-Schwarze
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Environmental Science and ForestryState University of New YorkSyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations