# Electrostatic Potential of Free Molecules Derived from Electron Diffraction Results

## Abstract

With the extension of the wave theory to electrons, studies of structures at atomic and molecular dimensions became possible. Not only have electron microscopes proven to be powerful tools in biology and medicine, but individual heavy atoms can be followed in their thermal motion on a single crystal surface,^{1} and the arrangement of atoms in crystals can be photographed directly.^{2,3} The wave nature of electrons has been established many different times, but Moellenstedt *et al*. gave the most direct demonstration in their biprism interference experiment.^{4} All these experiments have one thing in common: they utilize high-energy electrons (greater than 30 keV), as at this energy the de Broglie wavelength is smaller than the atomic dimensions to be studied. In spite of the theoretically high resolving power of an electron microscope, the structure of a free molecule cannot be projected on the observation screen. This failure is due to the aberrations with which all optical devices are universally afflicted.^{5} Hence the most precise information on the nature of the charge distribution in molecules is of the indirect type obtainable by means of diffraction experiments.

## Keywords

Electron Diffraction Differential Cross Section Born Approximation Molecular Electrostatic Potential Incoming Electron## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.A. V. Crewe, J. Wahl and J. P. Langmore, Visibility of single atoms, Science 168: 1338 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.L. Licht and F. Moellenstedt, personal communications.Google Scholar
- 3.J. M. Cowley and S. Iijima, Electron microscopy of atoms in crystals, Physics Today 30 (3): 32 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.G. Mollenstedt and H. Dueker, Besbachtungen und messungen an biprisma-interferenzen mit elektronen wellen, Zeit. f. Physik 145: 377 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.W. Glaser, “Grundlagen Der Elektronenoptik,” Van NostrandReinhold, New York (1974).Google Scholar
- 6.R. A. Bonham and M. Fink, “High Energy Electron Scattering,” Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York (1974).Google Scholar
- 7.R. A. Bonham, J. S. Lee, R. Kennerly and W. St. John, Experimental measurements of charge and momentum densities,generalized oscillator strengths and excitation frequencies, Adv. Quantum Chem. 11: 1 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.R. A. Bonham and M. Fink, Determination of charge densities and related quantities by use of high energy electron scattering, in: “Electron and Magnetization Densities in Molecules and Crystals,” NATO Advanced Study Institutes, Series B, Vol. 48, Plenum Press, New York (1980), p. 60.Google Scholar
- 9.See chapter 1 in reference 6. See also M. L. Davis, “Electron Diffraction in Gases,” Marcel Dekker, New York (1971).Google Scholar
- 10.K. Kuchitsu and L. S. Bartell, Effects of anharmonicity of molecular vibrations on the diffraction of electrons. II. Interpretation of experimental structural parameters, J. Chem. Phys. 35: 1945 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Cf. M. Fink, P. G. Moore and D. Gregory, Precise determination of differential electron scattering cross sections. I, J. Chem. Phys. 71: 5227 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.S. Konaka, Small angle electron diffraction by gases. Apparatus with electron counting device, Jap. J. Phys. 11:1199 (1972); S. Shibata, F. Hirota, N. Nakuta and T. Muramatsu, Electron distribution in water by high-energy electron scattering, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 18: 281 (1980).Google Scholar
- 13.A. L. Bennani, A. Duguet and H. F. Wellenstein, Differential cross sections for 35 keV electrons elastically scattered from NH3, J. Phys. B 12: 461 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.L. S. Bartell, The investigation of electron distribution in atoms by electron diffraction, Phys. Rev. 90: 833 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.C. Tavard, M. Rouault and M. Roux, Diffraction of X-ray and electrons by molecules. III. A method for the determination of molecular electron densities, J. Chim. Phys. 62:1410 (1965), and earlier works.Google Scholar
- 16.E. Clementi,
*Ab initio*computations in atoms and molecules, IBM J. Res. Develop. 9: 2 (1965).Google Scholar - 17.R. K. Nesbet, Atomic Bethe Goldstone Equation IV. Valence shell correlation energies of ground states of Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, S, Cl and Ar, Phys. Rev. A3:87 (1971), and previous works.Google Scholar
- 18.D. A. Kohl and L. S. Bartell, Electron densities from gas phase electron diffraction intensities. I. Preliminary considerations, J. Chem. Phys. 51: 2891 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.D. A. Kohl and L. S. Bartell, Electron densities from gas phase electron diffraction intensities. II. Molecular HartreeFock cross sections, J. Chem. Phys. 51: 2896 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.J. Epstein, J. Bentley and R. F. Stewart, On the use of generalized X-ray scattering factors for analysis of charge density from gas phase electron diffraction intensities, J. Chem. Phys. 66: 5564 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.P. E. Cade and A. C. Wahl, Hartree-Fock-Roothaan wave functions for diatomic molecules, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 13: 339 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.H. L. Cox, Jr. and R. A. Bonham, Elastic electron scattering amplitudes for neutral atoms calculated using the partial wave method at 10, 40, 70 and 100 keV for Z = 1 to Z = 54, J. Chem. Phys. 47: 2599 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.D. M. Brink and C. R. Satchler, “Angular Momentum,” Oxford University Press, London (1968).Google Scholar