Oscillatory Plant Transpiration: Problem of a Mathematically Correct Model

  • I. Gumowski
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 138)

Abstract

Oscillatory water transpiration is known to occur in many plant species with a repetition rate of the order of 30 minutes. The transpiration rhythm is directly related to a cyclic variation of stomatal apertures, and indirectly to the water content of guard, subsidiary and mesophyll cells. There exists a large number of accurately measured oscillation wave forms, some of which appear to be chaotic. A lumped-element hydraulic elastic model of the water transport was formulated in 1972, without specifying explicitly the forces responsible for the upward movement of water. An analysis of the implications of this model has disclosed an agreement with some observed properties, in particular the frequency of periodic oscillations, and a qualitative and quantitative disagreement with others, in particular the oscillation wave forms, as well as the response of the latter to various physical and chemical perturbations. The argument is re-examined and an improved model is proposed.

Keywords

Guard Cell Water Transport Mesophyll Cell Surface Tension Force Stomatal Aperture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A. Berger, Actes Coll, Uppsala 1970, UNESCO 5: 201–212 (1973).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Berger, Bull. Soc. Bot. de France 125: 159–176 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Berger, La Houille Blanche 3 /4: 227–233 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    I.R. Cowan, Planta (Berl) 106: 185–219 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    I. Gumowski, Cycle Res. 12: 273–291 (1981).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    I. Gumowski, Cycle Res. 14: 33–41 (1983).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    I. Gumowski, Comptes rendus Acad. Sc. Paris 295 (I): 483–486 (1982).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    I. Gumowski, Bull Acad. Roy. Belge. Cl. Sc. 5e S. 69: 204 209 (1983).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Johnsson et al., Physiol. Plant. Part I 28: 40–50 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Johnsson., Physiol. Plant. Part II 28: 341–345 (1973).Google Scholar
  11. A. Johnsson., Physiol. Plant. Part III 31: 112–118 (1974).Google Scholar
  12. A. Johnsson., Physiol. Plant. Part IV 31: 311–322 (1974).Google Scholar
  13. A. Johnsson., Physiol. Plant. Part V 32: 256–267 (1974).Google Scholar
  14. A. Johnsson., Physiol. Plant. Part VI 42: 379–386 (1978).Google Scholar
  15. A. Johnsson., Planta (Berl) 124: 99–103 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Johnsson., Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 80: 251–260 (1976).Google Scholar
  17. [10]
    A. Johnsson, Bulletin IMA (UK) 12 (1): 22–26 (1976)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Gumowski
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Toulouse 3ToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations