Cell Fusion pp 427-439 | Cite as

Bioselective Cell-Cell Fusion for Antibody Production

  • Mary K. Conrad
  • Mathew M. S. Lo
  • Tian Y. Tsong
  • Solomon H. Snyder

Abstract

For the past 10 years, monoclonal antibodies have been produced in many laboratories around the world by hybridoma cells formed during the random fusion, in the presence of polyethylene glycol, of hyperim-munized mouse spleen cells and selected myeloma cells (Kohler and Milstein, 1975; Galfre et al., 1977; Galfre and Milstein, 1981). This technology has provided major advancements in the biomedical sciences. The methodology, however, has two inherent disadvantages. The first is related to the random nature of fusion of cells and the high probability of destroying, losing or simply failing to fuse the relatively rare B cell producing the desired antibody. The second disadvantage is the fact that chemically induced fusions result in very large numbers of growing colonies that need to be screened for antibody production. In cases in which the antigen in question is very rare or is in a crude form, or both, this screening process poses insurmountable problems at times. In addition, chronic hyperimmunization of the animals prior to fusion has been the standard practice, in order to stimulate and expand the appropriate subpopulations of B cells and therefore increase the chance of including these cells of interest in the group ultimately fused. This practice necessitates the use of large amounts of antigen.

Keywords

Antibody Production Myeloma Cell Erythrocyte Ghost Mouse Spleen Cell Voltage Pulse Generator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berek, C., Griffiths, G. M., and Milstein, C., 1985, Molecular events during maturation of the immune response to oxazolone, Nature (Lond.) 316:412–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berman, J. W., and Basch, R. S., 1980, Amplification of the biotin-avidin immunofluorescence technique, J. Immunol Methods 36:335–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bischoff, R., Eisert, R. M., Schedel, I., Vienken, J., and Zimmermann, U., 1982, Human hybridoma cells produced by electro-fusion, FEBS Lett. 143:64–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlsson, J., Drevin, H., and Axen, R., 1978, Protein thiolation and reversible protein-protein conjugation. N-Succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio) propionate, a new heterobifunctional reagent, Biochem. J. 173:723–737.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Galfre, G., and Milstein, C., 1981, Preparation of monoclonal antibodies: Strategies and procedures, Methods Enzymol. 73:1–46.Google Scholar
  6. Galfre, G., Howe, S. C., Milstein, C., Butcher, G. W., and Howard, J. C., 1977, Antibodies to major histocompatibility antigens produced by hybrid cell lines, Nature (Lond.) 266:550–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Golds, E. E., and Braun, P. E., 1978, Protein associations and basic protein conformation in the myelin membrane. The use of difluorodinitrobenzene as a cross-linking reagent, J. Biol Chem. 253:8162–8170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Green, N. M., 1975, Avidin, Adv. Protein Chem. 29:85–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris, W. E., and Stahl, W. L., 1980, Organization of thiol groups of electric-eel electric-organ sodium-plus-potassium adenosine triphosphatase studied with bifunctional reagents, Biochem. J. 185:787–790.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Karsten, U., Papsdorf, G., Roloff, G., Stolley, P., Abel, G., Walther, I., and Weiss, H., 1985, Monoclonal anti-cytokeratin antibody from a hybridoma clone generated by electro-fusion, Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol. 21:733–740.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kinosita, K., and Tsong, T. Y., 1977, Formation and resealing of pores of controlled sizes in human erythrocyte membrane, Nature (Lond.) 268:438–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kinosita, K., and Tsong, T. Y., 1978, Survival of sucrose-loaded erythrocytes in the circulation, Nature (Lond.) 272:258–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kohler, G., and Milstein, C., 1975, Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity, Nature (Lond.) 256:495–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lo, M. M. S., Tsong, T. Y., Conrad, M. K., Strittmatter, S. M., Hester, L. D., and Snyder, S. H., 1984, Monoclonal antibody production by receptor-mediated electrically induced cell fusion, Nature (Lond.) 310:792–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lui, F. T., Zinnecker, M., Hamaoka, T., and Katz, D., 1979, New procedures for preparation and isolation of conjugates of proteins and a synthetic copolymer of D-amino acids and immunochemical characterization of such polymer, Biochemistry 18:690–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mishell, B. B., and Shiigi, S. M., eds., 1980, Selected Methods in Cellular Immunology, W. A. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  17. Neumann, E., Gerisch, G., and Opatz, K., 1980, Cell fusion induced by high electric impulses applied to Dictyostelium, Naturwissenschaften 67:414–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Orr, G. A., 1981, The use of the 2-iminobiotin-avidin interaction for the selective retrieval of labeled plasma membrane components, J. Biol. Chem. 256:761–766.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pohl, H. A., 1978, Dielectrophoresis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Siskind, G. W., and Benaceraff, B., 1969, Cell selection by antigen in the immune response, Adv. Immunol. 10:1–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sowers, A., 1984, Characterization of electric field induced fusion in erythrocyte ghost membrane, J. Cell Biol. 99:1989–1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sowers, A., 1986, A long-lived fusogenic state is induced in erythrocyte ghost by electric pulses, J. Cell Biol. 102:1358–1362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tonegawa, S., 1983, Somatic generation of antibody diversity, Nature (Lond.) 302:575–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tsong, T. Y., 1983, Voltage modulation of membrane permeability and energy utilization in cells, Biosci. Rep. 3:487–505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vienken, J., and Zimmermann, U., 1985, An improved electrofusion technique for production of mouse hybridoma cells, FEBS Lett. 182:278–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wormmeester, J., Stiekema, F., and De Groot, K., 1984 , A simple method for immunoselective cell separation with the avidin-biotin system, J. Immunol Methods 67:389–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Youle, R. J., and Neville, D. M., Jr., 1980, Anti-Thy 1.2 monoclonal antibody linked to ricin is a potent cell-type-specific toxin, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77:5483–5486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zimmermann, U., Vienken, J., Halfmann, J., and Emeis, C. C., 1985, Electrofusion: A novel hybridization technique, Adv. Biotech. Proc. 4:79–150.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary K. Conrad
    • 1
  • Mathew M. S. Lo
    • 1
  • Tian Y. Tsong
    • 2
  • Solomon H. Snyder
    • 3
  1. 1.National Institute on Drug AbuseAddiction Research CenterBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological ChemistryJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Departments of Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, and Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations