What Alpine Peasants Have in Common: Observations on Communal Tenure in a Swiss Village

  • Robert McC. Netting
Chapter

Abstract

The successful social regulation of land use reflects both a sensitivity to local social conditions and to the characteristics of the system of exploitation and the resource itself. In this instance of communal land tenure in the Swiss Alps, Netting examines an ancient and apparently very stable system of land management through communal tenure combined with private individual land ownership. Netting raises the question, “what variables promoted and effectively maintained the continued balance of individual and communal rights to resources?” He examines the characteristics of several types of communal holdings to explore the features of exploitation which particularly lend themselves to communal management: alpine grazing lands, forests, rugged waste lands, paths and roads. This example makes the useful point that persistence of a cultural practice of resource management through time requires explanation just as much as change does.

Keywords

Land Tenure Common Land Waste Land Individual Ownership Communal Ownership 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, A. R., and Butlin, R. A. (1973). Studies of Field Systems in the British Isles, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Barth, F. (1964). Nomads of South Persia, Humanities Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Berkes, F., Feeney, D., McCay, B. J., and Acheson, J. M. (1989). The benefits of the commons. Nature 340: 91–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloch, M. (1970). French Rural History, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  5. Boserup, E. (1965). The Conditions of Agricultural Growth, Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. Carrier, E. H. (1932). Water and Grass, Christophers, London.Google Scholar
  7. Chayanov, A. V. (1966). In Thorner, D., Kerblay, B., and Smith, R. E. F., (eds.), The Theory of Peasant Economy, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Ill.Google Scholar
  8. Engels, F. (1972). In Leacock, E. B., (ed.), The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, International, New York (orig. 1884).Google Scholar
  9. Evans, E. E. (1956). The ecology of peasant life in Western Europe. In Thomas, W. L. (ed.), Man’s Role in Changing the Face of the Earth, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 217–239.Google Scholar
  10. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Homans, G. C. (1960). English Villagers of the Thirteenth Century, Russell and Russell, New York (orig. 1941).Google Scholar
  12. Manners, R. A. (1964). Colonialism and native land tenure. In Manners, R. A. (ed.), Process and Pattern in Culture, Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. McCay, B. J., Acheson, J. M., (eds.) (1987). The Question of the Commons: The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  14. McCloskey, D. N. (1975). The persistence of English open fields. In Parke, W. N., and Jones, E. L. (eds.), Economic Issues in European Agrarian History, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  15. Morgan, L. H. (1963). In Leacock, F. B., Ancient Society (ed.), World, Cleveland (orig. 1877).Google Scholar
  16. Netting, R. McC. (1972). Of men and meadows: Strategies of alpine land use. Anthropological Quarterly 45: 132–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Netting, R. McC. (1974). The system nobody knows: Village irrigation in the Swiss Alps. In Downing, T. E., and Gibson, M. (eds.), Irrigation’s Impact on Society, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 67–75.Google Scholar
  18. Netting, R. McC. (1981). Balancing on an Alp: Ecological Change and Continuity in a Swiss Mountain Community. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Netting, R. McC. (1993). Smallholders, Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive, Sustainable Agriculture. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
  20. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pfeifer, G. (1956). The quality of peasant living in Central Europe. In Thomas, W. L. (ed.), Man’s Role in Changing the Face of the Earth. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 240–277.Google Scholar
  22. Sauter, M. R. (1950). Préhistoire du Valais, Vallesia 5: 1–165.Google Scholar
  23. Sprenger, U.-D. (n.d.). Besprechung einer Walliser Urkunde aus dem 13, Jahrhundert. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  24. Stenning, D. J. (1959), Savannah Nomads. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
  25. Uhlig, H. (1971). Fields and field systems. In Buchanan, R. H., Jones, E., and McCourt, D. (eds.), Man and His Habitat. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 93–125.Google Scholar
  26. Viazzo, P. P. (1989). Upland Communities: Environment, Population and Social Structure in the Alps since the Sixteenth Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. von Roten, P. (n.d.), Untersuchungen über die Verteilung und die rechtlichen Verhältnisse des Grundbesitzes in der Vispertälern im 13 und 14. Jahrhundert. Ms. in Staatsarchiv Sitten, SA 1081.Google Scholar
  28. Wolf, E. R. (1966). Peasants, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  29. Wolf, E. R. (1981). The vicissitudes of the closed corporate community. American Ethnologist 13: 325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zimmermann, J. (1968). Die Orts und Flurnamen des Vispertales im Wallis, Juris Druck-Verlag, Zürich.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert McC. Netting
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of ArizonaTuscon, Arizona, TusconUSA

Personalised recommendations