Abstract
Campylobacters are important causes of enteritis worldwide. Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli are the species most commonly involved.3 Recently, several investigators have found an increased proportion of C. concisus, a Campylobacter mainly associated with the oral cavity, in faeces from patients with symptoms of enteritis.5,13 Since we incubate our campylobacter media with filters in an atmosphere containing 7% H2, a large number of C. concisus was isolated in our laboratory. The isolation rate of C. concisus for a 17 month period was 2.4% in children and 1.5% in adults.7 Most of the C. concisus culture-positive patients presented diarrhoea. However, the occasional isolation of C. concisus together with other enteric pathogens from faeces of patients with enteritis and the detection of the organism in many healthy individuals, do not support the etiologic role of C. concisus in patients with enteritis. To clarify the possible pathogenicity of C. concisus, a study of the immune response to C. concisus was needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antibody response in a large group of patients with C. concisus culture-positive enteritis using a solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blaser M.J. and Duncan D.J. (1984) Immun. Infect, 44, 292–298.
Ebersole J.L., Taubman M.A., Smith D.J., and Haffajee A.D. (1985) Immun. Infect, 48. 534–539.
Griffiths P.L. and Park R.W.A. (1990) J. Appl. Bacteriol, 68, 281–301.
Nachamkin I. and Hart A.M. (1985) J. Clin. Microbiol, 21, 33–38.
Johnson C.C. and Finegold S.M. (1987) Rev. Infect. Dis, 9, 1150–1162.
Laemmli U.K. (1970) Nature (london), 227, 680–685.
Lauwers S., Devreker T., Van Etterijck R., Breynaert J., Van Zeebroeck A., Smekens L., Kersters K. and Vandamme P. (1991) Microb. Ecol. in Health & Dis, (Suppl), 4, S91.
Logan S. M. and Trust T.J. (1986) J. Bacteriol, 168, 739–745.
Lowry O.H., Rosebrough N.J., Farr A.L. and Randall R.J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem, 193, 265–275.
Newell D.G. (1986) J. Hyg, 96, 131–141.
Tanner A.C.R., Badger S., Lai C.H., Listgarten M.A., Visconti R.A. and Socransky S.S. (1981) Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol, 31,432–445.
Towbin H., Staechelin T. and Gordon J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 76, 4350–4354.
Vandamme P., Falsen E., Pot B., Hoste B., Kersters K. and Deley J. (1989) J. Clin. Microbiol, 27. 1775–1781
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhi, N., Revets, H., Van Zeebroek, A., Lauwers, S. (1996). Serological Response to Campylobacter Concisus Infection. In: Newell, D.G., Ketley, J.M., Feldman, R.A. (eds) Campylobacters, Helicobacters, and Related Organisms. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9558-5_127
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9558-5_127
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9560-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9558-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive