Employee Pay Plan Preferences in a Bank

  • T. J. Atchison
  • C. Zumberge

Abstract

The past ten years have seen a revolution in American industry. This revolution is a result of our lost competitiveness in the international marketplace. In attempts to regain their competitiveness, American companies have focused on increasing productivity in many ways. One of the most talked about ways has been to make drastic changes in the way human resources are managed within the organization (Grayson and O’Dell, 1988).

Keywords

Procedural Justice Distributive Justice Compensation System Wage Setting Human Resource Department 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atchison, T. J., “What Should We Pay For?” in R. J. Niehaus and K. F. Price, Human Resource Strategies for Organizations in Transition (New York: Plenum Press, 1990), pp. 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkowitz, Leonard, Colin Fraser, F. Peter Treasure, and Susan Cochran, “Pay, Equity, Job Gratifications, and Comparisons in Pay Satisfaction,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 72, No 4(1987), pp.544–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Folger, Robert, and Mary A. Konovsky, “Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1 (1989), pp. 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grayson, C. J., and C. O’Dell, The Two Minute Warning (New York: The Free Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  5. Greenberg, Jerald, “A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12, No. 1 (1987), pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
  6. Heneman, Robert L., Working Paper Series: Merit Pay Research (Columbus: OSU School of Business, 1989).Google Scholar
  7. Jenkins, G. Douglas, Jr., and Edward E. Lawler III, “Impact of Employee Participation in Pay Plan Development,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 28(1981), pp. 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lawler, Edward E. III, “Managers’ Attitudes Toward How Their Pay Is and Should Be Determined,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 50, No. 4 (1966), pp. 273–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lawler, Edward E. III, Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View_(New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971).Google Scholar
  10. Lawler, Edward E. III, “The New Pay,” USC Center for Effective Organizations, 1985.Google Scholar
  11. Leventhal, Gerald S., Jurgis Karuza, Jr., and William Rick Fry, “Beyond Fairness: A Theory of Allocation Preferences,” Justice and Social Interaction, ed. G. Mikula (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1980).Google Scholar
  12. Price, James L., and Charles W. Mueller, Handbook of Organizational Measurement (Boston: Pitman, 1986).Google Scholar
  13. Wallace, M., Alternative Reward Systems (Scottsdale, AZ: American Compensation Association, 1989).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. J. Atchison
    • 1
  • C. Zumberge
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Business AdministrationSan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.BankTempsSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations