Advertisement

A Cross Cultural Study of Managerial Attitudes toward Executive Development: Implications for Transnational Organizations

  • M. E. Beres
  • J. D. Portwood
  • M. A. S. Latib
  • M. J. Timmons
  • J. M. Chowdhury

Abstract

Management literature in recent years has been replete with articles documenting the increasing importance of global markets. These writings warn of intense worldwide competition which may threaten the survival of organizations not well adapted to cope with this new environment (e.g. Aggarwal, 1987; Kantor, 1991b). Corporations have been encouraged to respond aggressively to these trends by restructuring themselves into more truly global or “transnational” forms (Bartlett & Ghoshal, 1988), and by developing cosmopolitan, globally focused management teams capable of operating effectively across national and cultural boundaries (Reich, 1991). While both of these recommendations have considerable merit, their implementation may well create an interesting dilemma for corporate human resource executives.

Keywords

Human Resource Management Hierarchical Level Senior Manager Strategy Formulation Management Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, N. J. International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior. (Boston: Kent Publishing Co.) 1986.Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett, C. A. & Ghoshal S., “Organizing for Worldwide Effectiveness: The Transnational Solution”, California Management Review, Vol. 30, Fall 1988, pp. 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fisher, R. & Ury, W. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. (New York: Penguin Books), 1981.Google Scholar
  4. Ganitsky, J. & Watzke, G. E., “Implications of Different Time Perspectives for Human Resource Management in International Jointventures”, Management International Review, Vol. 30, 1990, pp. 37–51.Google Scholar
  5. Granrose, C. S., “Lessons for Western-based Global Enterprises from Career Management Practices in East Asia”, Paper presented at the National Academy of Global Business, New Orleans, La., Nov. 1989.Google Scholar
  6. Hayes, J. & Allinson, C. W., “Cultural Differences in Learning Styles of Managers”, Management International Review, Vol. 28, #2, 1988, pp.75–80.Google Scholar
  7. Kantor, R. M., “Globalism vs. Localism: A New Human Resource Agenda”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69 #2, March–April 1991(a), pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
  8. Kantor, R. M., “Transcending Business Boundries: 12,000 World Managers View Change”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69 #3, May–June 1991(b), pp. 151–164.Google Scholar
  9. Koster, R. S., “International Human Resource Planning and Development: The Emerging Profession”, in R.J. Niehaus & K.F. Price, Eds. Creating the Competitive Edge Through Human Resource Applications, (New York: Plenum Press), 1988, pp. 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Laurent, A., “The Cross-Cultural Puzzle of International Human Resource Management”, Human Resomve Management, Vol. 25 #1, Spring 1986, pp. 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Myers, I.B. Introduction to Type: A Description of the Theory and Applications of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. (Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Pyschologists Press), 1987.Google Scholar
  12. Portwood, J. D., “Changing Corporate Realities: Considering Career Opportunities for U.S. Citizens in Foreign Owned Firms”, Paper presented at the National; Academy of Global Business, New Orleans La., Nov. 1989.Google Scholar
  13. Portwood, J. D., Latib, M., & Timmons, M. J., “Realigning Executive Development and Succession Planning Systems: Meeting the Management Needs of ‘Global Organizations’ in the 1990’s”, in R.J. Niehaus & K.F. Price, Eds. Human Resource Strategies for Organizations in Transition, (New York: Plenum Press), 1990, pp. 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pucik, V., “Strategic Alliances, Organizational Learning, and Competetive Advantage: The HRM Agenda”, Human Resource Management, Vol. 27#1, Spring 1988, pp. 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reich, R. B., “Who is Them?”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69 #2, pp. 77-89.Google Scholar
  16. Schneider, S. C., “National vs. Corporate Culture: Implications for Human Resource Management”, Human Resource Management, Vol. 27#2, Summer 1988, pp. 240–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shaeffer, R. G., “Matching International Business Growth and International Management Development”, Human Resource Planning, Vol 12 #1, 1989, pp. 29–35.Google Scholar
  18. Taylor, W., “The Logic of Global Business: An Interview with ABB’s Percy Barneik”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69 #2, March–April 1991, pp. 91–105.Google Scholar
  19. Tung, R. L., “Selection and Training Procedures of U.S., European, and Japanese Multinationals” California Management Review, Vol. 25 #1 1982.Google Scholar
  20. Zeira, Y. & Shenkar, O., “Human Resources and the International Joint Venture”, The International Executive, March–April 1990, pp. 40-43.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. E. Beres
    • 1
  • J. D. Portwood
    • 2
  • M. A. S. Latib
    • 3
  • M. J. Timmons
    • 4
  • J. M. Chowdhury
    • 5
  1. 1.Leadership SystemsDecaturUSA
  2. 2.Broad and MongomeryTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Allentown CollegeCenter ValleyUSA
  4. 4.Dominion Textiles, Inc.MontrealCanada
  5. 5.University of ScrantonScrantonUSA

Personalised recommendations