Search and Recognition: Spin Glass Engineering as an Approach to Protein Structure Prediction

  • Peter G. Wolynes
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 263)


Protein folding is perhaps the most complex process that can be usefully described in purely atomistic terms.1, 2 In order to function, a protein generally must take on a specific three-dimensional structure. It is, at present, unknown how this process occurs in the living cell. It is possible and, indeed, likely, that for many proteins, special biological machinery and catalysts are necessary for this process. However, it is also known that for some smaller proteins, this process of folding into a well defined structure can occur spontaneously in the absence of special biological machinery. In principle, this in vitro folding process can be studied using the ideas of physics and chemistry alone. A huge diversity of states of varying stabilities can occur in the folding process. It is important then to attack the problem of understanding protein folding by seeking a language that can reconcile diversity and stability.


Spin Glass Associative Memory Protein Structure Prediction Folding Process Free Energy Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L. M. Gierasch and J. King, “Protein Folding,” AAAS, (1990).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. E. Schulz and R. H. Schimer, “Principles of Protein Structure,” Springer-Verlag, New York (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. D. Bryngelson and P. G. Wolynes, Spin Glasses and the Statistical Mechanics of Protein Folding, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 84: 7524 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. G. Wolynes, Spin Glass Ideas in the Protein Folding Problem, in: “Spin Glasses and Biology,” D. L. Stein, ed., World Scientific Press, New York (to appear 1990).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. D. Bryngelson and P. G. Wolynes, Intermediates and Barrier Crossing in a Random Energy Model (with Applications to Protein Folding), J. Phys. Chem. 93: 6902 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. S. Friedrichs and P. G. Wolynes, Toward Protein Tertiary Structure Recognition by Means of Associative Memory Hamiltonians, Science 246: 371 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. D. Bryngelson and P. G. Wolynes, A Simple Statistical Field Theory of Heteropolymer Collapse with Application to Protein Folding, Biopolymers 30: 177 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. S. Friedrichs and P. G. Wolynes, Molecular Dynamics of Associative Memory Hamiltonians for Protein Tertiary Structure Recognition, Tetrahedron Computer Methodology, (to appear 1990).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Sasai and P. G. Wolynes, Molecular Theory of Associative Memory Hamiltonian Models of Protein Folding, preprint.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Garel and H. Orland, Mean Field Model for Protein Folding, Europhys. Lett. 6: 307 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Garel and H. Orland, Chemical Sequence and Spatial Structure in Simple Models of Biopolymers, Europhys. Lett. 6: 597 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. I. Shakhnovich and A. M. Gutin, The Nonergodic (Spin-glass Like) Phase of Heteropolymers with Quenched Disordered Sequence of Links, Europhys. Lett. 8: 327 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. I. Shakhnovich and A. M. Gutin, Frozen States of Disordered Heteropolymers, J. Phys. A22: 1647 (1989); A. V. Finkelstein and E. I. Shakhnovich, Theory of Cooperative Transitions in Protein Molecules. 2. Phase Diagram for a Protein Molecule in Solution, Biopolymers 28: 1681 (1989).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. I. Shakhnovich and A. M. Gutin, Formation of Unique Structure in Polypeptyde Chains: Theoretical Investigation with the Aid of Replica Approach, Biophys. Chem. 34: 187 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. I. Shakhnovich and A. M. Gutin, Relaxation to Equilibrium in the Random Energy Model, Europhys. Lett. 9: 569 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. I. Shakhnovich and A. M. Gutin, Implication of Thermodynamics of Protein Folding for Evolution of Primary Sequences, Nature (to appear 1990).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. I. Shakhnovich and A. M. Gutin, Protein Folding as Pattern Recognition, Studia Biophysica 132: 47 (1989).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. D. Honeycutt and D. Thirumalai, Metastability of the Folded States of Globular Proteins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87: 3526 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. J. Hopfield, Neural Networks and Physical Systems with Emergent Collective Computational Abilities, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 79: 2554 (1982).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. Derrida, Random Energy Model: Limit of a Family of Disordered Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45: 79 (1980).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. S. Richardson, The Anatomy and Taxonomy of Protein Structure, Adv. Protein Chem. 37: 167 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. A. Angell, D. R. MacFarlane and N. Oguni, The Kauzmann Paradox, Metastable Liquids and Ideal Glasses: A Summary, Ann. New York Acad. Sci., 484: 241 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    P. L. Privalov, Stability of Protein: Small Globular Proteins, Adv. Protein Chem. 33: 167 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. Levinthal, Are there Pathways for Protein Folding? J. Chim. Phys. 65: 44 (1968).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    B. Derrida, Mean Field Theory of Directed Polymers in a Random Medium and Beyond, in: “Complexity and Evolution,” Les Honches (1990).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    H. A. Scheraga, Calculations of Stable Conformations of Polypeptides, Proteins and Protein Complexes, Chemica Scripta 29A: 3 (1989).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Levitt and A. Warshel, Computer Simulation of Protein Folding, Nature 253: 694 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    I. D. Kuntz, An Approach to the Tertiary Structure of Globular Proteins, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 97: 4364 (1975).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. Skolnick, A. Kolinski and R. Yaris, Monte Carlo Simulations of the Folding of Beta Barrel Globular Proteins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85: 5057 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. Denker, et al, Large Automatic Learning Rule Extraction and Generalization, Complex Systems 1: 877 (1987).MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. J. Rooman, and S. J. Wodak, Identification of Predictive Sequence Motifs Limited by Protein Structure Data Base Size, Nature 335: 45 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    J. W. Ponder and F. Richards, Tertiary Template for Proteins-Use of Packing Criteria in the Enumeration of Allowed Sequences for Different Structural Classes, J. Mol. Biol. 193: 775 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    T. R. Kirkpatrick and P. G. Wolynes, Stable and Metastable States of Mean Field Potts and Structural Glasses, Phys. Rev. B36: 8552 (1987).ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    T. R. Kirkpatrick and P. G. Wolynes, Connections Between some Kinetic and Equilibrium Theories of the Glass Transition, Phys. Rev. A35: 3072 (1987).ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. S. Friedrichs and P. G. Wolynes, Genetic Algorithms for Model Biomolecular Optimization Problems, preprint.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter G. Wolynes
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Chemical Sciences and Beckman InstituteUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations