Abstract
The development of in vivo spectroscopic methods for the study of cell suspensions, perfused organs, intact animals and humans over the past two decades has relied primarily on the observation of nuclei other than protons. In particular, 31P and 13C NMR studies of intact systems have provided information about the energetics and biochemistry of intact cells, and applications involving these nuclei have been reviewed extensively (Hollis, 1980; Iles et al.,1982; Baxter et al.,1983; London, 1988). A number of other nuclei have also proven useful, including sodium and fluorine; in vivo applications utilizing both are reviewed in this volume (Miller and Elgavish, this volume; Selinsky and Burt, this volume). Although deuterium tracers have proven useful for mapping out the biosynthetic pathways of secondary metabolites using in vitro NMR methods (Abell, 1986, and references therein), initial consideration of some of the limitations of this isotopequadrupolar broadening, significant kinetic isotope effects, and small chemical shift dispersion—suggests that it will have limited use as an in vivo tracer. Despite these limitations, several factors make deuterium a favorable isotope for in vivo metabolic NMR studies in some cases. The low natural abundance (1.56 × 10−2%) minimizes interference from resonances of endogenous compounds. The relatively short spin-lattice relaxation times due to the quadrupolar relaxation mechanism, lead to important real-time sensitivity gains and minimize the intensity distortions which can arise from overpulsing. In contrast to 13C studies, it is generally not necessary to use decoupling methods which are difficult to implement in vivo. The relative ease of synthesis of many deuterated compounds and related low cost of commercially available deuterated materials, particularly in comparison with 13C-labeled compounds, is also an attractive advantage for metabolic studies. In general, in vivo studies with 2H may be useful for situations in which a relatively limited number of spectral lines are present, and in which the molecular size and/or rotational correlation time of labeled metabolites are sufficiently small so that quadrupolar broadening is not excessive. In the experience of this reviewer, the major advantage of using deuterium as an in vivo tracer is the extreme technical ease with which studies can be carried out. This factor has led to the suggested use of deuterated metabolites in pilot or feasibility studies even in situations in which it may ultimately prove necessary to use a different labeling strategy (Eng et al., 1990). Deuterium labels provide information about the chemistry of the labeled “proton” which in some cases cannot be obtained using 13C labels, as illustrated in the studies of formaldehyde metabolism (e.g., Mason and Sanders, 1989). Additionally, the presence of deuterium labels in metabolites of interest has been detected based on the perturbations of proton or carbon resonances of the molecule. Recent 2H NMR studies have utilized D2O as a freely diffusible tracer to measure blood flow and tissue perfusion (Ackerman et al., 1987a, b), and the potential of deuterium imaging has also been explored (Ewy et al., 1986, 1988; Muller and Seelig, 1987; Link and Seelig, 1990). The present review provides a general consideration of the use of 2H labels in metabolic studies (Section 2) as well as summarizing some recent metabolic (Section 3) and imaging and perfusion studies (Section 4). The general area of 2H NMR studies of lipids, which includes some in vivo NMR work, has been reviewed elsewhere (Jacobs and Oldfield, 1980; Seelig and Macdonald, 1987) and is not covered here. Finally, we note that for this review we have adopted the following nomenclature: the symbol “D” is used in chemical formulas, e.g., HDO, and “2H” is used to denote labeling when the common name is used, e.g., [methyl-2H3]lactate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abell, C., 1986, Modern Methods Plant Anal. 2: 60.
Ackerman, J. J. H., Ewy, C. S., Becker, N. N., and Shalwitz, R. A., 1987a, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 4099.
Ackerman, J. J. H., Ewy, C. S., Kim, S.-G., and Shalwitz, R. A., 1987b, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 508: 89.
Aguayo, J. B., McLennan, I. J., Aguiar, E., and Cheng, H.-M., 1987, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 142: 359.
Aguayo, J. B., Gamcsik, M. P., and Dick, J. D., 1988a, J. BioL Chem. 263: 19552.
Aguayo, J. B., McLennan, I. J., Graham, C., Jr., and Cheng, H.-M., 19886, Exp. Eye Res. 47: 337.
Bailey, J. M., Fishman, P. H., and Pentchev, P. G., 1968, J. Biol. Chem. 243: 4827.
Barrow, K. D., Rogers, P. L., and Smith, G. M., 1986, Eur. J. Biochem. 157: 195.
Baxter, R. L., Mackenzie, N. E., and Scott, A. I., 1983, BioL Magn. Reson. 5: 1.
Block, R. E., and Parekh, B. C., 1987, Magn. Reson. Med. 5: 286.
Borie, F., and Seelig, J., 1983, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 735: 131.
Brereton, I. M., Irving, M. G., Field, J., and Doddrell, D. M., 1986, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 137: 579.
Brereton, I. M., Doddrell, D. M., Oakenfull, S. M., Moss, D., and Irving, M. G., 1989, NMR Biomed. 2: 55.
Brindle, K. M., Campbell, I. D., and Simpson, R. J., 1986, Eur. J. Biochem. 158: 299.
Brindle, K. M., Campbell, I. D., and Simpson, R. J., 1987, Biol. Magn. Reson. 7: 81
Cooper, A. J. L., and Meister, A., 1972, Biochemistry 11: 661.
de los Santos, C., Buldain, G., Frydman, B., Cannata, J. J. B., and Cazzulo, J. J., 1985, Eur. J. Biochem. 149: 421.
Eng, J., Berkowitz, B. A., and Balaban, R. S., 1990, NMR Biomed. 3: 173.
Evelhoch, J. L., McCoy, C. L., and Girj, B. P., 1989, Magn. Reson. Med. 9: 402.
Ewy, C. S., Babcock, E. E., and Ackerman, J. J. H., 1986, Magn. Reson. Imag. 4: 407.
Ewy, C. S., Ackerman, J. J. H., and Balaban, R. S., 1988, Magn. Reson. Med. 8: 35.
Foster, A. B., 1984, Trends PharmacoL Sci. 5: 524.
Frahm, J., Haase, A., and Matthaei, D., 1986, Magn. Reson. Med. 3: 321.
Frydman, B., de los Santos, C., Cannata, J. J. B., and Cazzulo, J. J., 1990, Eur. J. Biochem. 192: 363.
Fung, B. M., Durham, D. L., and Wassil, D. A., 1975, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 399: 191
Gatley, S. J., Wess, M. M., Govoni, P. L., Wagner, A., Katz, J. J., and Friedman, A. M., 1986, J. Nuclear Med. 27: 388.
Goodman, M. N., Masuoka, L. K., deRopp, J. S., and Jones, A. D., 1989, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 159: 522.
Grant, D. M., Curtis, J., Croasmun, W. R., Dalling, D. K., Wehrli, F., and Wehrli, S., 1982, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104: 4492.
Hanin, I., and Schuberth, J., 1974, J. Neurochem. 23: 819.
Hollis, D. P., 1980, Biot Magn. Reson. 2: 1.
Hotchkiss, R. S., Song, S.-K., Ling, C. S., Ackerman, J. J. H., and Karl, I. E., 1990, Am. J. Physiol. 258: R21.
Hunter, B. K., Nicholls, K. M., and Sanders, J. K. M., 1984, Biochemistry 23: 508.
Hunter, B. K., Nicholls, K. M., and Sanders, J. K. M., 1985, Biochemistry 24: 4148
Iles, R. A., Stevens, A. N., and Griffiths, J. R., 1982, Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 15: 49–200.
Irving, M. G., Brereton, I. M., Field, J., and Doddrell, D. M., 1987, Magn. Reson. Med. 8: 88.
Isab, A. A., and Rabenstein, D. L., 1979, FEBS Lett. 106: 325.
Jacobs, R. E., and Oldfield, E., 1980, Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 14: 113.
Katz, J. J., and McGarry, J. D., 1984, J. Clin. Invest. 74: 1901.
Katz, J., Golden, S., and Wals, P. A., 1979, Biochem. J. 180: 389.
Kim, S.-G., and Ackerman, J. J. H., 1988, Magn. Reson. Med. 8: 410.
Kimmich, R., Gneiting, T., Kotitschke, K., and Schnur, G., 1990, Biophys. J. 58: 1183.
Kosicki, G. W., 1968, Biochemistry 7: 4310.
Lentner, C., 1981, Geigy Scientific Tables, Vol. 1, Ciba-Geigy Corp., West Caldwell, N.J., p. 217.
Leopold, M. F., Epstein, W. W., and Grant, D. M., 1988, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110: 616.
Link, J., and Seelig, J., 1990, J. Magn. Reson. 89: 310.
Lombardini, J. B., and Talalay, P., 1970, Adv. Enzyme Regul. 9: 349.
London, R. E., 1988, Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 20: 337.
London, R. E., and Gabel, S. A., 1988, Biochemistry 27: 7864.
London, R. E., Hildebrand, C. E., Olson, E. S., and Matwiyoff, N. A., 1976, Biochemistry 15: 5480.
London, R. E., Galvin, M. J., Thompson, M., Jeffreys, L., and Mester, T., 1985, J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 11: 21.
London, R. E., Gabel, S. A., and Funk, A., 1987, Biochemistry 26: 7166.
Malloy, C. R., Sherry, A. D., and Jeffrey, F. M., 1988, J. Biol. Chem. 263: 6964
Mantsch, H. H., Saito, H., and Smith, I. C. P., 1977, Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 11: 211.
Martin, G. J., Zhang, B. L., Martin, M. L., and Dupuy, P., 1983, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 111: 890.
Martin, G. J., Zhang, B. L., Naulet, N., and Martin, M. L., 1986, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108: 5116.
Martineau, A., Lecavalier, L., Falardeau, P., and Chiasson, J. L., 1985, Anal. Biochem. 151: 495.
Mason, R. P., and Sanders, J. K. M., 1989, Biochemistry 28: 2160.
Mason, R. P., Sanders, J. K. M., and Gidley, M. J., 1986, Phytochemistry 25: 1567
Mason, R. P., Sanders, J. K. M., and Cornish, A., 1987a, Biochem. Soc. Trans. 15: 148.
Mason, R. P., Sanders, J. K. M., and Cornish, A., 1987b, FEBS Lett. 216: 4.
Melander, L., and Saunders, W. H., 1980, Reaction Rates of Isotopic Molecules, Wiley, New York.
Muller, S., and Seelig, J., 1987, J. Magn. Reson. 72: 456.
Newmark, R. D., Un, S., Williams, P. G., Carson, P. J., Morimoto, H., and Klein, M. P., 1990, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 583.
Oldfield, E., Meadows, M., and Glaser, M., 1976, J. Biot Chem. 251: 6147.
Oxley, S. T., Porteous, R., Brindle, K. M., Boyd, J., and Campbell, I. D., 1984, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 805: 19.
Pascal, R. A., Jr., Baum, M. W., Wagner, C. K., Rodgers, L. R., and Huang, D.-S., 1986, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108: 6477.
Peng, S.-K., Ho, K.-J., and Taylor, C. B., 1972, Arch. Pathol. 94: 81.
Pohl, L. R., and Gillette, J. R., 1985, Drug. Metal). Rev. 15: 1335.
Rinaldi, P. L., and Baldwin, N. J., 1982, 1 Am. Chem. Soc. 104:5791.
Rognstad, R., and Wals, P., 1976, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 437: 16.
Rose, I. A., 1960, J. Biol. Chem. 235: 1170.
Rose, I. A., 1970, in The Enzymes, 3rd ed. (Boyer, P. D., ed.), Vol. II, Academic Press, New York, p. 281.
Schmitt, P., Wesener, J. R., and Gunther, H., 1983, 1 Magn. Reson. 52:511.
Seelig, J., and Macdonald, P. M., 1987, Acc. Chem. Res. 20: 221.
Simpson, R. J., Brindle, K. M., Brown, F. F., Campbell, I. D., and Foxall, D. L., 1981, Biochem. J. 193: 401.
Simpson, R. J., Brindle, K. M., Brown, F. F., Campbell, I. D., and Foxall, D. L., 1982, Biochem. J. 202: 581.
Stepuro, I. I., Moroz, A. R., and Piletskaya, T. P., 1986, Biokhimiya 51: 729.
Walker, T. E., and Wageman, W. W., 1986, Magn. Reson. Chem. 24: 157.
Wesener, J. R., and Gunther, H., 1983, Org. Magn. Reson. 21: 433.
Wesener, J. R., Schmitt, P., and Gunther, H., 1984, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106:10.
Wheeler, W. D., Kaizaki, S., and Legg, J. I., 1982, Inorg. Chem. 21: 3250.
York, M. J., Kuchel, P. W., Chapman, B. E., and Jones, A. J., 1982, Biochem. J. 207: 65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
London, R.E. (1992). In Vivo 2H NMR Studies of Cellular Metabolism. In: Berliner, L.J., Reuben, J. (eds) In Vivo Spectroscopy. Biological Magnetic Resonance, vol 11. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9477-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9477-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9479-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9477-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive