Psychophysiological Assessment and Biofeedback

Applications for Athletes in Closed-Skill Sports
  • Daniel M. Landers

Abstract

One of the major problems of interest to sport psychologists has been the study of stress responses of athletes to competition. Over the years, many theories and hypotheses have been advanced to explain this relationship. For example, the popular inverted-U hypothesis between arousal and performance predicts that performance will be best when arousal for a given individual on a particular task is at a moderate level. Unfortunately, this and other theories/hypotheses have been tested primarily by examining performance outcome measures (such as an average performance score or win/loss record). Few research studies have been designed to measure physiological arousal reactions continually while subjects are performing. If an attempt has been made to measure arousal at all, it usually consisted of a discrete physiological measure (i.e., a stethoscope measure of heart rate or Palmar Sweat Index) or a global paper—pencil measure of arousal (e.g., STAI or SCAT). Without some measure of an intervening process to describe the physiological and behavioral manifestations of arousal that ultimately affects performance, limited understanding would be gained upon which to base biofeedback or other cognitive—behavioral strategies.

Keywords

Cardiac Cycle Fine Tuning Breathing Pattern Galvanic Skin Response Biofeedback Training 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernstein, D. A., & Borkovec, T. D. Progressive relaxation training. Champaign, B.: Research Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. Daniels, F. S., & Landers, D. M. Biofeedback and shooting performance: A test of disregulation and systems theory. Journal of Sport Psychology, 1981, 3, 271–282.Google Scholar
  3. Daniels, F. S., & Landers, D. M. Performance in rifle shooting: The importance of matching autonomic perception with physiological reactivity (Abstract). Psychophysiology, 1983, 20, 437.Google Scholar
  4. Daniels, F. S., Landers, D. M., & Wilkinson, M. O. Cardiac self-regulation and performance in elite and sub-elite rifle shooters (Abstract). In G. C. Roberts and D. M. Landers (Eds.), Psychology of motor behavior and sport-1980 (p. 90 ). Champaign, Il.: Human Kinetics, 1980.Google Scholar
  5. Daniels, F. S., Landers, D. M., Wilkinson, M. O., & Hatfield, B. D. Heart rate and its effects on performance. Unpublished manuscript, Arizona State University, Exercise and Sport Research Institute, Tempe, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. Doyle, L. A. Differential effectiveness of relaxation procedures in attenuating components of anxiety in shooters. Paper presented at the meeting of the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity, College Park, Md., June 1982.Google Scholar
  7. Eberlin, P., & Mulholland, T. Bilateral differences in parietal-occipital EEG induced by contingent visual feedback. Psychophysiology, 1976, 13, 212–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fenz, W. D., & Epstein, S. Gradients of physiological arousal of experienced and novice parachutists as a function of an approaching jump. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1967, 29, 33–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall, E. G., & Hardy, C. J. Ready, aim, fire. The efficacy of transcendental meditation and progressive relaxation with imagery for enhancing pistol marksmanship. Unpublished manuscript, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 1983.Google Scholar
  10. Hatfield, B. D., Central and autonomic nervous system activity during self-paced motor performance: A study of the activation construct in marksmen. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 1982.Google Scholar
  11. Hatfield, B. D., & Landers, D. M. A new direction for sports psychology. Journal of Sports Psychology, 1983, 5, 243–259.Google Scholar
  12. Hatfield, B. D., Landers, D. M., & Ray, W. J. Cognitive processes during self-paced motor performance: An electroencephalographic profile of skilled marksmen. Journal of Sport Psychology, 1984, 6, 55–70.Google Scholar
  13. Hatfield, B. D., Landers, D. M., Ray, W. J., & Daniels, F. S. An electroencephalographic study of elite rifle shooters. The American Marksman, February, 1982, 7, 6–8.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, R. S. Rifle accuracy as a function of electrodermal activity. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Tennessee Technological University, 1978.Google Scholar
  15. Lacey, J. I. Psychophysiological approaches to the evaluation of psychotherapeutic process and outcome. In E. A. Rubinstein & M. B. Paraloff (Eds.), Research in psychotherapy (Vol. 1 ). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1959.Google Scholar
  16. Lacey, J. I. Somatic response patterning and stress: Some revisions of activation theory. In M. H. Appley & R. Turnbull (Eds.), Psychological stress: Issues in research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.Google Scholar
  17. Lacey, J. I., Bateman, D. E., & Van Lehn, R. Autonomic response specificity: An experimental study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1953, 15, 8–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lacey, J. I., & Lacey, B. C. Some autonomic-central nervous system interrelationships. In Black, P. (Ed.), Physiological correlates of emotion, New York: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  19. Landers, D. M., Christina, R. W., Hatfield, B. D., Daniels, F. S., & Doyle, L. A. Moving competitive shooting into the scientist’s lab. American Rifleman, April 1980, 52, 36–39.Google Scholar
  20. Landers, D. M., Wang, M. Q., & Courtet, P. Peripheral narrowing among experienced and inexperienced rifle shooters under low-and high-stress conditions. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, in press.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, D. A., Daniels, F. S., Landers, D. M., Wilkinson, M. O., & Hatfield, B. D. Autonomic self-regulation and performance: A case study of an Olympic champion (Abstract). Psychology of motor behavior and sport-1981. Davis, CA: Department of Physical Education, University of California, Davis, 1981.Google Scholar
  22. MacCaslin, E. F., & Levy, L. The effects of flinching on M-1 marksmanship. (HumRRO Staff Memorandum). Alexandria, Va.: Human Resources Research Organization, March 1955 (AD 477-645).Google Scholar
  23. Murphy, P. J., Lakey, W., & Maurek, P. Effects of simultaneous divergent EEG feedback from both cerebral hemispheres on changes in verbal and spatial tasks. Biofeedback and Self-regulation, 1976, 1, 337–338.Google Scholar
  24. Obrist, P. A. Cardiovascular psychophysiology: A perspective. New York: Plenum, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Leary, J. B. The effect of heart rate and facial cooling on biathlon marksmanship. Paper presented at a meeting. B. The effect of heart rate and facial cooling on biathlon marksmanship. Paper presented at a meeting “Nordic skiing—A scientific approach,” Telemark, Wi., November 1980.Google Scholar
  26. Oxendine, J. B. Psychology of motor learning ( 2nd ed. ). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1984.Google Scholar
  27. Pullum, B. Psychology of shooting. Schiessportschule Dialogues, 1977, 1, 1–17.Google Scholar
  28. Sandweiss, J., & Green, W. A. Athletic applications of biofeedback. Task Force Study Section Report, Biofeedback Society of America, March 1980.Google Scholar
  29. Schmid, W. D. Cardiac deceleration among archers. Unpublished manuscript. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1984.Google Scholar
  30. Schmidt, R. A. Motor control and learning. Champaign, II.: Human Kinetics, 1982.Google Scholar
  31. Schwartz, G. E. Disregulation and systems theory: A biobehavioral framework for biofeedback and behavioral medicine. In N. Birbaumer & H. D. Kimmel (Eds.), Biofeedback and self-regulation. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  32. Schwartz, G. E., Davidson, R. J., & Coleman, D. J. Patterning of cognitive and somatic processes in the self-regulation of anxiety: Effects of meditation versus exercise. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1978, 40, 321–328.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, R. E., & Rohsenow, D. J. Trainer’s manual for cognitive-affective stress management training. Unpublished manual, University of Washington, Seattle, 1982.Google Scholar
  34. Starkes, J. L. Anticipatory behavior in rifle shooters. Unpublished manuscript. McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 1982.Google Scholar
  35. Stern, R. Reaction time and heart rate between the GET SET and GO of simulated races. Psychophysiology, 1976, 13, 149–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tretilova, T. A., & Rodimiki, E. M. Investigation of the emotional state of rifle shooters. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 1979, 5, 28.Google Scholar
  37. U.S. Army Marksmanship Unit. International rifle marksmanship guide. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978.Google Scholar
  38. Wenz, B. J., & Strong, D. J. An application of biofeedback and self-regulation procedures with superior athletes: The fine tuning effect. In R. M. Suinn (Ed.), Psychology in sports: Methods and applications. Minneapolis: Burgess, 1980.Google Scholar
  39. Wilkinson, M. O., Landers, D. M., & Daniels, F. S. Respiration patterning as related to performance in elite and subelite rifle shooters (Abstract). In G. C. Roberts & D. M. Landers (Eds.), Psychology of motor behavior and sport-1980. Champaign, Il.: Human Kinetics, 1980.Google Scholar
  40. Wilkinson, M. O., Landers, D. M., & Daniels, F. S. Breathing patterns and their influence on rifle shooting. The American Marksman, August 1981, 6, 8–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel M. Landers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health and Physical Education, Exercise and Sport Research InstituteArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations