Considerations in the Development of a Mycology Laboratory

  • Gerald C. Llewellyn
  • Charles E. O’Rear
Part of the Biodeterioration Research book series (BIOR, volume 4)


The objective herein is to provide the conceptual basis as well as some specifics needed in the development of a mycology laboratory. It is acknowledged that physical constraints and fiscal limitations would have major effects on the development of an ideal mycology laboratory. However, it is possible, over several years, to plan and then gradually develop such a physical facility without the need for an immediate and substantial fiscal out-lay. It must be noted that substantial initial start-up funds for the development of such a laboratory would be needed if there is no physical facility currently in place or an building/area capable of being modified. At times, building modifications may be more expensive and have inherent restrictions which could make the additional cost for a new facility more palatable. Also, a new building offers numerous advantages in design and resultant quality of the laboratories housed therein. Certainly the mycology laboratory will be tied to the other laboratories and the facilities available, but creativity, planning, and flexibility can be exercised so that the mycology component is suitably functional and a quality laboratory.


Ventilation System Physical Facility Material Safety Data Sheet Isolation Room Receive Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bacteriological Analytical Manual of the Division of Microbiology. Sixth Ed. (1984). Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc., Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
  2. Collins, C.H. and Lyne, P.M. (1984). Microbiological Methods. Fifth Ed. Butterworth & Co. Ltd. London, pp. 10–28.Google Scholar
  3. Dell’Orco, R.T. (1985). Layout and Equipment of a Cell Culture Laboratory. In: Setting Up and Maintenance of Tissue and Cell Cultures. Elsevier Scientific Publishers, Ireland Ltd. pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  4. Haley, L.D. and Callaway, C.S. (1978). Laboratory Methods in Medical Mycology. HEW Publication No. 78–8361 ( CDC ), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  5. International Equipment Company. (1980). Installation, Operation and Service Manual for General Purpose Refrigerated Centrifuge Model DPR 6000. Damon/IEC Division. Needham Heights, MA.Google Scholar
  6. Kent, P.T. and Kubica, G.P. (1985). Public Health Mycobacteriology: A Guide for the Level III Laboratory. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333, pp. 5–20.Google Scholar
  7. Llewellyn, G.C., Warren, N.G., and O’Dell, V.L. Requirements for a Properly Functioning Laboratory of Mycology, In: Analytical Mycology of Foods. Edited by P. B. Mislivec and R. Bandler. Marcel Dekker, NY. (Provided upon invite, 1989 ).Google Scholar
  8. Melvin, D.M. and Brooke, M.M. (1982). Laboratory Procedures for the Diagnosis of Intestinal Parasites. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333, pp. 71–72.Google Scholar
  9. Paul, J. (1975). Cell and Tissue Culture. Fifth Ed. Churchill Livingstone, 23, Ravelston Terrace, Edinburgh, UK. pp. 162–174.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald C. Llewellyn
    • 1
    • 2
  • Charles E. O’Rear
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forensic ScienceThe George Washington UniversityUSA
  2. 2.The Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental ControlNew CastleUSA

Personalised recommendations