Is There Social Life beyond the Dyad?

A Social-Psychological View of Social Connections in Infancy
  • Saul Feinman
  • Michael Lewis
Part of the Genesis of Behavior book series (GOBE, volume 4)


The study of infants’ social relations has focused primarily on dyadic interaction. Early research concentrated on the mother—infant and the stranger—infant dyads. During the past decade, the view of infants’ social network has expanded to include relationships with fathers, infant peers, substitute caregivers, siblings, and grandparents. There has been increasing concern in the last few years about extradyadic social forces, as evidenced by research on second-order and indirect effects, and by consideration of the infant as a member of a family system (Belsky, 1981; Lewis & Rosenblum, 1979; Lewis & Weinraub, 1976; Pedersen, Anderson, & Cain, 1980). Nevertheless, in comparison with research on social relations in adults and older children, the study of infant sociability remains dominated by a dyadic focus. This chapter considers the various ways in which social connections beyond the dyad affect the infant.


Child Development Social Comparison Coalition Formation American Sociological Review Maternal Employment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abramovitch, R., Corter, C., & Lando, B. Sibling interaction in the home. Child Development, 1979, 50, 1189–1196.Google Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, M. D., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. Aldous, J. Family careers: Developmental change in families. New York: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, C. W. Attachment in daily separation: Reconceptualizing day care and maternal employment issues. Child Development, 1980, 51, 242–245.Google Scholar
  5. Aries, P. Centuries of childhood. New York: Random House, 1962.Google Scholar
  6. Asch, S. E. Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgements. In H. Geutzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men. Pittsburgh: Carnegie, 1951.Google Scholar
  7. Bales, R. F. Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.Google Scholar
  8. Bales, R. F., & Borgatta, E. F. Size of group as a factor in the interaction profile. In A. P. Hare, E. F. Borgatta, and R. F. Bales (Eds.), Small groups. New York: Knopf, 1967.Google Scholar
  9. Bales, R. F., Strodbeck, F., Mills, T. M., & Roseborough, M. Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 1951, 16, 461–468.Google Scholar
  10. Becker, J. M. T. A learning analysis of the development of peer-oriented behavior in ninemonth-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 1977, 13, 481–491.Google Scholar
  11. Belsky, J. Early human experience: A family perspective. Developmental Psychology, 1981, 17, 3–23.Google Scholar
  12. Belsky, J., & Steinberg, L. D. The effects of day care: A critical review. Child Development, 1978, 49, 929–949.Google Scholar
  13. Berger, J., Fisek, J., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M., Jr. Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation states approach. New York: Elsevier, 1977.Google Scholar
  14. Blau, P. Power and exchange in social life. New York: Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
  15. Blehar, M. C. Anxious attachment and defensive reactions associated with day care. Child Development, 1974, 45, 683–692.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Blood, R. O. Jr., & Wolfe, D. M. Husbands and wives: The dynamics of family living. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  17. Broderick, C. B., & Pulliam-Krager, H. Family process and child outcomes. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, and I. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 1 ). New York: Free Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  18. Bronfenbrenner, U. Two worlds of childhood: U.S. and U.S.S.R. New York: Russell Sage, 1970.Google Scholar
  19. Bronfenbrenner, U. Developmental research, public policy, and the ecology of childhood. Child Development, 1974, 45, 1–5.Google Scholar
  20. Brooks, J., & Lewis, M. Infants’ responses to strangers: Midget, adult, and child. Child Development, 1976, 47, 323–332.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Brossard, J. H. S., & Boll, E. S. Personality types in the large family. Child Development, 1955, 26, 71–78.Google Scholar
  22. Brossard, J. H. S., & Sanger, W. The large family system—A research report. American Sociological Review, 1952, 17, 3–9.Google Scholar
  23. Burke, P. J. Participation and leadership in small groups. American Sociological Review, 1974, 39, 832–843.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Campos, J. J., Emde, R. N., Gaensbauer, T., & Henderson, C. Cardiac and behavioral interrelationships in the reactions of infants to strangers. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11, 589–601.Google Scholar
  25. Caplow, T. Two against one: Coalitions in triads. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1968.Google Scholar
  26. Carey, W. B., & McDevitt, S. C. Revision of the Infant Temperament Questionnaire. Pediatrics, 1978, 61, 735–739.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Centers, R., Raven, B. H., & Rodrigues, A. Conjugal power structure: A reexamination. American Sociological Review, 1971, 36, 264–278.Google Scholar
  28. Charlesworth, W. R., & Kreutzer, M. A. Facial expressions of infants and children. In P. Ekman (Ed.), Darwin and facial expression. New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  29. Chilman, C. S. Families in poverty in the early 1970s: Rates, associated factors, some implications. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1975, 37, 49–60.Google Scholar
  30. Clarke-Stewart, K. A. And daddy makes three: The father’s impact on mother and young child. Child Development, 1978, 49, 466–478.Google Scholar
  31. Cohen, L. J., & Campos, J. J. Father, mother, and stranger as elicitors of attachment behavior in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 1974, 10, 146–154.Google Scholar
  32. Coleman, J. S. The adolescent society. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  33. Coleman, J. S., Katz, E., & Menzel, H. Medical innovation: A diffusion study. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966.Google Scholar
  34. Constantine, L. L., & Constantine, J. M. Group marriage: A study of contemporary multilateral marriage. New York: Macmillan, 1973.Google Scholar
  35. Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. Power, equity, and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 1978, 43, 721–739.Google Scholar
  36. Cramer, J. C. Fertility and female employment: Problems of causal direction. American Sociological Review, 1980, 45, 397–432.Google Scholar
  37. Cromwell, R. E., & Olson, D. H. (Eds.). Power in families. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
  38. Cromwell, V. L., & Cromwell, R. E. Perceived dominance in decision-making and conflict resolution among Anglo, Black, and Chicano couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1978, 40, 749–759.Google Scholar
  39. Cummings, E. M. Caregiver stability and day care. Developmental Psychology, 1980, 16, 31–37.Google Scholar
  40. Darley, J. M., Teger, A. I., & Lewis, L. D. Do groups always inhibit individuals’ responses to potential emergencies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 26, 395–399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Dawe, H. C. The influence of size of kindergarten group upon performance. Child Development, 1934, 5, 295–303.Google Scholar
  42. Dunn, J., & Kendrick, C. Interaction between young siblings: Association with the interaction between mother and firstborn child. Developmental Psychology, 1981, 17, 336–343.Google Scholar
  43. Easterbrooks, M. A., & Lamb, M. E. The relationship between quality of infant—mother attachment and infant competence in initial encounters with peers. Child Development, 1979, 50, 380–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Eckerman, C. O., & Whatley, J. L. Toys and social interaction between infant peers. Child Development, 1977, 48, 1645–1656.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Eckerman, C. O., Whatley, J. L., & McGhee, L. J. Approaching and contacting the object another manipulates: A social skill of the 1 year old. Developmental Psychology, 1979, 15, 585–593.Google Scholar
  46. Edwards, C. P., & Lewis, M. Young children’s concepts of social relations: Social functions and social objects. In M. Lewis and L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), The child and its family. New York: Plenum Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  47. Emerson, R. M. Power-dependence relations: Two experiments. American Sociological Review, 1962, 27, 31–41.Google Scholar
  48. Erikson, K. T. Everything in its path: Destruction of community in the Buffalo Creek flood. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1976.Google Scholar
  49. Falbo, T., & Peplau, L. A. Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 618–628.Google Scholar
  50. Farran, D. C., & Ramey, C. T. Social class differences in dyadic involvement during infancy. Child Development, 1980, 51, 254–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Feinman, S. Infant response to race, size, proximity, and movement of strangers. Infant Behavior and Development, 1980, 3, 187–204.Google Scholar
  52. Feinman, S. Social referencing in infancy. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1982, 28, 445–470.Google Scholar
  53. Feinman, S., & Lewis, M. Social referencing and second order effects in ten-month-old infants. In J. Rubenstein (Chair), Conceptualizing second order effects in infancy. Symposium presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, April 1981.Google Scholar
  54. Feinman, S., & Lewis, M. Infant temperament and social referencing. Presented at meeting of the International Conference on Infant Studies, Austin, Texas, March 1982.Google Scholar
  55. Feinman, S., & Lewis, M. Social referencing at 10 months: A second order effect on infants responses to strangers. Child Development, 1983, 54, 878–887.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Feiring, C., & Lewis, M. Early mother-child interaction: Families with only and firstborn children. In G. L. Fox (Ed.), The childbearing decision. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1982.Google Scholar
  57. Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 1954, 7, 17–40.Google Scholar
  58. Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  59. Field, T. M. Infant behaviors directed towards peers and adults in the presence and absence of mother. Infant Behavior and Development, 1979, 2, 47–54.Google Scholar
  60. Field, T. M., & Pawlby, S. Early face-to-face interaction of British and American workingclass and middle-class mother-infant dyads. Child Development, 1980, 51, 250–253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Frankel, D. G., & Arbel, T. Group formation by two-year-olds. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1980, 3, 287–298.Google Scholar
  62. Frankel, D. G., & Arbel, T. Social organization of young children’s groups: A comparison of 2 models of dominance relations. Psychological Reports, 1980, 46, 911–915.Google Scholar
  63. Gamson, W. A. A theory of coalition formation. American Sociological Review, 1961, 26, 565–573.Google Scholar
  64. Gans, H. J. The urban villagers. New York: Free Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  65. Garbarino, J. The human ecology of child maltreatment: A conceptual model for research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1977, 39, 721–727.Google Scholar
  66. Garbarino, J., & Sherman, D. High-risk neighborhoods and high-risk families: The human ecology of child maltreatment. Child Development, 1980, 51, 188–198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Goetsch, G. G., & McFarland, D. D. Models of the distribution of acts in small discussion groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1980, 43, 173–183.Google Scholar
  68. Goldman, J. A. Social participation of preschool children in same-versus mixed-age groups. Child Development, 1981, 52, 644–650.Google Scholar
  69. Granovetter, M. S. Child-rearing, weak ties, and socialism: A conjecture. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Sociological Association, Denver, September 1971.Google Scholar
  70. Granovetter, M. S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78, 1360–1380.Google Scholar
  71. Gunnar, M. R. Control, warning signals, and distress in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 1980, 16, 281–289.Google Scholar
  72. Hare, A. P. Interaction and consensus in different sized groups. American Sociological Review, 1952, 17, 261–267.Google Scholar
  73. Haviland, J., & Lewis, M. Infants’ greeting patterns to strangers. Paper presented at the meeting of the Human Ethology Session of the Animal Behavior Society, Wilmington, N.C., May 1975.Google Scholar
  74. Hay, D. F., Nash, A., & Pedersen, J. Responses of six-month-olds to the distress of their peers. Child Development, 1981, 52, 1071–1075.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Heider, F. Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 1946, 21, 107–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Heinicke, C., & Westheimer, I. Brief separations. New York: International Universities Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  77. Hock, E., & Clinger, J. B. Behavior toward mother and stranger of infants who have experienced group day care, individual day care, or exclusive maternal care. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1980, 137, 49–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Indik, B. P. Organization size and member participation: Some empirical tests of alternatives. Human Relations, 1965, 18, 339–350.Google Scholar
  79. Jacobs, B. S., & Moss, H. A. Birth order and sex of sibling as determinants of mother-infant interaction. Child Development, 1976, 47, 315–322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Jacobson, S. W. Matching behavior in the young infant. Child Development, 1979, 50, 425–430.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Kaye, K. Learning by imitation in infants and young children. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, March 1971.Google Scholar
  82. Kelman, H. Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1961, 25, 57–78.Google Scholar
  83. Kendrick, C., & Dunn, J. Caring for a second baby: Effects on interaction between mother and first born. Developmental Psychology, 1980, 16, 303–311.Google Scholar
  84. Killen, M., & Uzgiris, I. C. Imitation of actions with objects: The role of social meaning. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1981, 138, 219–229.Google Scholar
  85. Klinnert, M., Campos, J. J., Sorce, J., Emde, R. N., & Svejda, M. J. Social referencing: An important appraisal process in human infancy. In R. Plutchik and H. Kellerman (Eds.), The emotions (Vol. 2 ). New York: Academic Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  86. Kohn, M. L. Social class and parental values. American Journal of Sociology, 1959, 64, 337–351.Google Scholar
  87. Komorita, S. S., & Moore, D. Theories and processes of coalition formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 371–381.Google Scholar
  88. Lakin, M., Lakin, M. G., & Costanzo, P. R. Group processes in early childhood: A dimension of human development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1979, 2, 171–183.Google Scholar
  89. Lamb, M. E. Twelve-month-olds and their parents: Interactions in a laboratory playroom. Developmental Psychology, 1976, 12, 237–244.Google Scholar
  90. Lamb, M. E. Father-infant and mother-infant interaction in the first year of life. Child Development, 1977, 48, 167–181.Google Scholar
  91. Lamb, M. E. Infant social cognition and “second-order” effects. Infant Behavior and Development, 1978, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
  92. Lamb, M. E. The development of social expectations in the first year of life. In M. E. Lamb and L. R. Sherrod (Eds.), Infant social cognition: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.Google Scholar
  93. Lamb, M. E. Maternal employment and child development: A review. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), Nontraditional families: Parenting and childrearing. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1982.Google Scholar
  94. Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton Century Crofts, 1970.Google Scholar
  95. Latané, B., & Rodin, J. A lady in distress: Inhibiting effects of friends and strangers on bystander intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1969, 5, 189–202.Google Scholar
  96. Leavitt, M. J. Contingent feedback, familiarization, and infant affect: How a stranger becomes a friend. Developmental Psychology, 1980, 16, 425–432.Google Scholar
  97. Lenski, G., & Lenski, J. Human societies ( 4th ed. ). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982.Google Scholar
  98. Lewis, M. The social network systems model: Toward a theory of social development. In T. Field (Ed.), Review in human development. New York: Wiley, 1982.Google Scholar
  99. Lewis, M. Issues in the study of imitation. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, San Francisco, March 1979.Google Scholar
  100. Lewis, M., & Feiring, C. The child’s social world. In R. M. Lerner and G. B. Spanier (Eds.), Child influences on marital and family interaction: A lifespan perspective. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  101. Lewis, M., & Feiring, C. Some American families at dinner. Paper presented at a conference on the Family as a Learning Environment, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J., November 1979.Google Scholar
  102. Lewis, M., & Feiring, C. Direct and indirect interactions in social relationships. In L. Lipsitt (Ed.), Advances in infancy research. New York: Ablex, 1981.Google Scholar
  103. Lewis, M., & Kreitzberg, V. S. Effects of birth order and spacing on mother-infant interaction. Developmental Psychology, 1979, 15, 617–625.Google Scholar
  104. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
  105. Lewis, M., & Wilson, C. D. Infant development in lower-class American families. Human Lewis, M., & Rosenblum, L. A. (Eds.). The child and its family. New York: Plenum Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  106. Lewis, M., & Weinraub, M. A. The father’s role in the child’s social network. In M. E. Development, 1972, 15, 112–127.Google Scholar
  107. Lewis, M., Young, G., Brooks, J., & Michalson, L. The beginning of friendship. In M. Lewis and L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), Friendship and peer relations. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
  108. Liebow, E. Tally’s corner. Boston, Little, Brown, 1967.Google Scholar
  109. Lytton, H. Disciplinary encounters between young boys and their mothers and fathers: Is there a contingency system? Developmental Psychology, 1979, 15, 256–268.Google Scholar
  110. Martin, J. A. A longitudinal study of the consequences of early mother—infant interaction: A microanalytic approach. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1981, 46, (3, Serial No. 190).Google Scholar
  111. Mayhew, B., & Levinger, R. L. On the emergence of oligarchy in human interaction. Unpublished manuscript, Temple University, 1974.Google Scholar
  112. McGrew, W. C. An ethological study of children’s behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  113. Merton, R. K. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  114. Merton, R. K., & Rossi, A. S. Contributions to the theory of reference group behavior. In R. K. Merton, Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  115. Miller, C. E. Coalition formation in triads: Effects of liking and resources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981, 7, 296–301.Google Scholar
  116. Minuchin, S. Familes and family therapy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  117. Moore, K. A., & Hofferth, S. L. Women and their children. In R. E. Smith (Ed.), The subtle revolution: Women at work. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute, 1979.Google Scholar
  118. Morgan, G. A., & Ricciuti, H. N. Infants’ responses to strangers during the first year. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), Determinants of infant behavior (Vol. 4 ). London: Methuen, 1969.Google Scholar
  119. Neal, A., & Seeman, M. Organization and powerlessness: A test of the mediation hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 1964, 29, 216–225.Google Scholar
  120. Nelson, J. I. Clique contacts and family orientation. American Sociological Review, 1966, 31, 663–672.Google Scholar
  121. Parke, R. D. Conceptualization of the effects of fathers in infancy. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development. New York: Wiley, 1979.Google Scholar
  122. Parke, R. D., & Collmer, C. W. Child abuse: An interdisciplinary analysis. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Review of child development research (Vol. 5 ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  123. Pastor, D. L. The quality of mother—infant attachment and its relationship with toddlers’ initial sociability with peers. Developmental Psychology, 1981, 17, 326–335.Google Scholar
  124. Pedersen, F. A., Anderson, B. J., & Cain, R. L. Jr. Parent—infant and husband—wife interaction at age five months. In F. A. Pedersen (Ed.), The father—infant relationship. New York: Praeger, 1980.Google Scholar
  125. Piaget, J. The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  126. Pleck, J., Staines, G. L., & Lang, L. Conflicts between work and family life. Monthly Labor Review, 1980, 103 (3), 29–31.Google Scholar
  127. Rheingold, H. L., & Eckerman, C. O. Fear of the stranger: A critical review. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  128. Ricciuti, H. N. Fear and the development of attachments in the first year of life. In M. Lewis and L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), The origins of fear. New York: Wiley, 1974.Google Scholar
  129. Rosenberg, M. Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
  130. Salamon, S., & Keim, A. M. Land ownership and women’s power in a Midwestern farming community. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1979, 41, 109–119.Google Scholar
  131. Samuels, H. R. The effect of an older sibling on infant locomotor exploration of a new environment. Child Development, 1980, 51, 607–609.Google Scholar
  132. Savin-Williams, R. C. Dominance hierarchies in groups of early adolescents. Child Development, 1979, 50, 923–932.Google Scholar
  133. Schaffer, H. R., & Crook, C. K. Child compliance and maternal control techniques. Developmental Psychology, 1980, 16, 54–61.Google Scholar
  134. Schaffer, H. R., Greenwood, A., & Parry, M. H. The onset of wariness. Child Development, 1972, 43, 165–175.Google Scholar
  135. Schubert, J. B., Bradley-Johnson, S., & Nuttal, J. Mother—infant communication and maternal employment. Child Development, 1980, 51, 246–249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Shanas, E. Family-kin networks and aging in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1973, 35, 505–511.Google Scholar
  137. Sherif, M. Group influences upon the formation of norms and attitudes. In E. Maccoby, T. Newcomb, and E. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1958.Google Scholar
  138. Smith, P. K. Social and situational determinants of fear in the playgroup. In M. Lewis and L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), The origins of fear. New York: Wiley, 1974.Google Scholar
  139. Smith, S., & Haythorn, W. W. Effects of compatibility, crowding, and leadership seniority on stress, anxiety, hostility, and annoyance in isolated groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 22, 67–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Snow, M. E., Jacklin, C. N., & Maccoby, E. E. Birth-order differences in peer sociability at thirty-three months. Child Development, 1981, 52, 589–595.Google Scholar
  141. Sojit, C. M. The double-bind hypothesis and the parents of schizophrenics. Family Process, 1971, 10, 53–75.Google Scholar
  142. Spinetta, J. J., & Rigler, D. The child abusing parent: A psychological review. Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 77, 296–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Stack, C. B. All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Harper and Row, 1974.Google Scholar
  144. Strodbeck, F. L., James, R. M., & Hawkins, C. Social status in jury deliberations. American Sociological Review, 1957, 22, 714–719.Google Scholar
  145. Suomi, S. J., & Harlow, H. F. The role and reason of peer relationships in Rhesus monkeys. In M. Lewis and L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), Friendship and peer relations. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
  146. Thoman, E. B., Barnett, C. R., & Leiderman, P. H. Feeding behaviors of newborn infants as a function of parity of the mother. Child Development, 1971, 42, 1471–1483.Google Scholar
  147. Trivers, R. L. Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 1974, 14, 249–264.Google Scholar
  148. Tulkin, S. R., & Kagan, J. Mother-child interaction in the first year of life. Child Development, 1972, 43, 31–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Turnbull, C. The forest people. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1961.Google Scholar
  150. Vandell, D. L. Effects of a playgroup experience on mother—son and father—son interaction. Developmental Psychology, 1979, 15, 379–385.Google Scholar
  151. Vandell, D. L., Wilson, K. S., & Whalen, W. T. Birth-order and social experience differences in infant—peer interaction. Developmental Psychology, 1981, 17, 438–445.Google Scholar
  152. Van den Berghe, P. L. Man in society ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Elsevier, 1978.Google Scholar
  153. Vogel, E. F., & Bell, N. W. The emotionally disturbed child as a family scapegoat. In N. W. Bell and E. F. Vogel (Eds.), A modern introduction to the family. New York: Free Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  154. Webster, M. A. Actions and actors. Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop, 1975.Google Scholar
  155. Weinraub, M. A., & Putney, E. The effects of height on infants’ social responses to unfamiliar persons. Child Development, 1978, 49, 598–603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Weinraub, M. A., Brooks, J., & Lewis, M. The social network: A reconsideration of the concept of attachment. Human Development, 1977, 20, 31–47.Google Scholar
  157. Whyte, W. F. Street corner society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1943.Google Scholar
  158. Williams, R. M., & Mattson, M. L. The effect of social groupings upon the language of preschool children. Child Development, 1942, 13, 233–245.Google Scholar
  159. Wolff, K. H. The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press, 1950.Google Scholar
  160. Young, M., & Wilmott, P. Family and kinship in East London. Baltimore: Penguin, 1957.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saul Feinman
    • 1
  • Michael Lewis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA
  2. 2.Department of PediatricsRutgers Medical School—University of Medicine and Dentistry of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations