Unused Opportunities for Behaviour Therapy in Education

  • Henck P. J. G. van Bilsen

Abstract

The mention of ‘education and behaviour therapy’ in the title of this chapter refers to an uneasy attempt to draw together two otherwise quite separate work fields. Or at least that is the case in the Netherlands, where behaviour therapy, as a practical application of behaviourism, is largely used to practise (psycho)therapy. Thus, training, professional recognition and behaviour therapy itself is largely aimed at psychotherapeutic settings. In companies, schools, prisons etc its principles hardly exist. Dutch education as a whole is anything but contaminated by the knowledge of behaviour therapy. Its use is minimal. Very rarely it is used to solve an isolated behaviour problem of a pupil (see Engelen and Krab’s summary in this compilation).

Keywords

Autistic Child Behavior Analysis Apply Behavior Analysis Behaviour Instruction Good Behavior Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayllon, T. & Roberts, M. (1974). Eliminating discipline problems by strengthening academic performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 771–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, J.S., Wolf, M.M. & Phillips, E.L. (1970). Home-based reinforcement and the modification of predelin quents’ classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 233–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrish, H.H., Saunders, M. & Wolf, M.M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bierman, K.L. & Furman, W. (1984). The effects of social skills training and peer involvement on the social adjustment of pre-adolescents. Child Development, 55, 151–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bilsen, H.P.J.G. van (1989). Motivational Interviewing. Paper gepresenteerd op het eerste Europese Congres van Psychologie, Juli 1989, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  6. Bolstad, O.D. & Johnson, S.M. (1972). Seifregulation in the modification of disruptive classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 443–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruin, I.J. de (1983). Verwijzing Speciaal Onderwijs naar Jeugdhulpverlening. Interne publicatie van het Pedologisch Instituut Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  8. Cartlegde, G. & Milburn, J.F. (1986). Teaching Social Skills to Children. New York: Regano Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, H.B., Rowbury, T. & Bear, A.M. (1973). Timeouts as a punishing stimulus in confinuous and intermittent schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 443–455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Copeland, R.E., Brown, R.E. & Hall, R.V. (1974). The effects of principal-implement techniques on the behavior of pupils. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cossairt, A., Hall, R.V. & Hopkins, B.L. (1973). The effects of experimenter’s instructions, feedback and praise on teacher praise and student attending behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 89–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drabman, R.S. & Lahey, B.B. (1974). Feedback in classroom behavior modification: Effects on the target and her classmates. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 591–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Favell, (1992). Persoonlijke mededeling,, Wereldconferentie Gedragstherapie, Australië.Google Scholar
  14. Foxx, R.M. & Shapiro, S.T. (1978). The timeout ribbon: A nonexclusionary timeout procedure. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 125–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greer, R.D. & Polirstok, S.R. (1982). Collateral gains and short-term maintenance in reading and on-task responses by innercity adolecents as a function of their use of social reinforcement while tutoring. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15,123–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall, R.V., Lund D. & Jackson, D. (1968). Effects of teacher attention on study behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoeben, S.M. & Lier, P.A. van (1992). Bronnenboek sociaal-emotionele ontwikkeling. ‘s-Hertogenbosch: Katholiek Pedagogisch Studiecentrum.Google Scholar
  18. Hollin, CR. & Trower, P. (1986). Applications across the life span. Handbook of social skills training, 1, Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Houten, R. van, Nau, P.A., MacKenzie-Keating, S.E., Sameoto, D. & Colavecchia, B. (1982). An analysis of some variables influencing the effectiveness of reprimands. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 65–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, F.H., Fremouw, W. & Carples, S. (1977). Pyramid training of elementary school teachers to use a classroom management “skill package”. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 239–253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jongbloed, M.H.B. & Gunning I.A.P.M. (1991). Gedrags- en emotionele problemen binnen enkele vormen van speciaal onderwijs. In H.J.P.G. van Bilsen & H.D. Swager(red.). Speciaal; onderwijs & jeugdhulpver lening. De Lier: Academisch Boeken Centrum.Google Scholar
  22. Jonkers, J. (1991). Programma sociale vaardigheden. Pi-school Rotterdam, interne publikatie.Google Scholar
  23. Kazdin, A.E. & Klock, J. (1973). The effect of nonverbal teacher approval on student attentive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 643–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kazdin, A.E. (1973). The effect of vicarious reinforcement on attentive behavior in the classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 71–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koegel, R.L., Russo, D.C. & Rincover, A. (1977). Assessing and training teachers in the generalized use of behavior modification with autistic children. Journal of Applied Beyhavior Analysis, 10, 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lahey, B.B. & Kazdin, A.S. (1977) (eds.). Advances in Clinical Child Psychology, 1. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  27. Lieshout, C.F.M. van & Ferguson, T.J., Lier, P.A. van & Vierssen, D.J. van (1987). Diepteproject Sociaal-emo tionele Ontwikkeling. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit.Google Scholar
  28. Lindsley, O.R. (1992). Why aren’t effective teaching tools widely adopted? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25,21–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matson, J. & Ollendick, Th.H. (1988).Enchanching Children’s Social Skills. Assessment and Training. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mayer, G.R., Butterworth, T., Nafpaktits, M. & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1983). Preventing school vandalism and improving descipline: A three-year study. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 355–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Minuchin, S., e.a. (1967). Families of the Slums. New York: Basic Books Inc.Google Scholar
  32. Molen, H.T. van der & Zee, S.A.M. van der (1985). Sociale redzaamheidprogramma’s voor minderbegaafde jongeren. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, vakgroep Persoonlijkheidspsychologie.Google Scholar
  33. O’Leary, K.D., Becker, W.C., Evans, M.B. & Saudargas, R.A. (1968). A token reinforcement program in a public school: A replication and systematics analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Petermann, F. & Petermann, U. (1988). Training mit agressiven Kindern. (Einzeltraining, Kindergruppen, Elternberatung). München-Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
  35. Petermann, U. (1988). Werken met sociaal angstige kinderen (theorie en praktijk van de training). Nijmegen: Dekker & Van de Vegt.Google Scholar
  36. Pfiffner, L.J., Rosen, L.A. & O’Leary, S.G. (1985). The efficacy of an all-positive approach to classroom management. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 257–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Polirstok, S.R. & Greer, R.D. (1977). Remidiation of mutually aversie interactions between a problem student and four teachers by training the student in reinforcement techniques. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10,707–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Porterfield, J.K., Herbert-Jackson, E. & Risley, T.R. (1976). Contingent observation: An effective and acceptable procedure for reducing disruptive behavior of young children in a group setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 55–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prochaska, J.O. & DiClemente, C.C. (1984). The Transtheoretical Approach: Crossing Traditional Boundaries of Therapy. Home wood, Illinois: Dow Jones-Irwin.Google Scholar
  40. Ringrose, H.J. & Nijenhuis, E.H. (1986). Bangzijn voor andere kinderen. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
  41. Russo, D.C. & Koegel, R.L. (1977). A method for integrating an autistic child into a normal public-school classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 579–590.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanders-Woudstra, J.A.R. & Verhulst, F.C. (1987). Epidemiologisch-kinderpsychiatrische benadering van de ontwikkelingen in het speciaal onderwijs. In K. Doornbos & L.M. Stevens (red.). De groei van het speciaal onderwijs. deel A. Analyse van historié en onderzoek. ‘s-Gravenhage: Staatsuitgeverij.Google Scholar
  43. Santogrossie, D.A., O’Lear, K.D., Romanczyk, R.G. & Kaufman, K.F. (1973). Seifevaluation by adolecents in a psychiatric hospital school token program. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schuurman, C.M.A. (1991). Mogelijkheden en beperkingen van de stimulering van de sociaal emotionele ontwikkeling van kinderen in het speciaal onderwijs. In H.P.J.G. van Bilsen & H.D. Swager (red.). Speciaal Onderwijs en Jeugdhulpverlening. De Lier: Academisch Boeken Centrum.Google Scholar
  45. Sherman, T.M. & Cormier, W.H. (1974). An investigation of the influence of studentbehavior on teacher behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 11–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith, B.M., Schumaker, J.B., Schaeffer, J. & Sherman, J.A. (1982). Increasing partcipation and improving the quality of duscussions in seventh-grade social studies classes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 97–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith, L.K.C. & Fowler, S.A. (1984). Positive peer pressure: The effects of peer monitoring on children’s disruptive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Solomon, R.W. & Wahler, R.G. (1973). Peer reinforcement control of classroom problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 49–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Trovato, J. & Bucher, B. (1980). Peer tutoring with or without homebased reinforcement, for reading remediation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13,129–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wielkiewicz, R. (1986). Behavior Management in the Schools. New York: Pregmom.Google Scholar
  51. Willems, E.P. (1974). Behavioral Technology and Behavioral Ecology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henck P. J. G. van Bilsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Pedologisch InstituutRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations